Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fred Thompson has lymphoma AND he has 2 small children - should he run for office?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:00 PM
Original message
Fred Thompson has lymphoma AND he has 2 small children - should he run for office?
2 small children - ages 3 and 7 months. Why doesn't he want to spend the time he has left watching his kids grow up - do we want that kind of moral values in the WhiteHouse? Do we want to worry about his VP taking over?

Why would the part of the GOP that distrusts those folks on the Council on Foreign Relations want Fred - who is part of the Council on Foreign Relations?

And he hired Rove smear and fear and make up facts "op-po" reseacher Tim Griffin as his campaign manager - a fellow that some say should be in jail - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=du9QWpCWbbY

Does the GOP just want a Hollywood script reader that has played the part of the President and has shown love of Bush/Cheney by being fund raiser for their boy Scooter?

Won't the Democrats paint him as a hypocrite after he attacked Michael Moore for taking 9-11 workers to Cuba for medical care, while he hasstacks of Cuban cigars in his office? Does the GOP care about trade with Cuba? Does our Media care about Fred's mis-steps?

Ar least with Fred in the race, Edwards should no longer get GOP remarks about his wife's illness meaning he should drop out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. How old is his wife?
How old is his wife?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Much younger than Fred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. She's 40. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Are they Fred's kids or the Milk Man's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Papa Bear and Goldilocks!
Decades of lobbying money, Hollywood access, network stardom and Presidential potential to boot? Doink-doink!... that's "just right!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. ... three small children, you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blueberry_raspberry Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do old farts have kids?
When the 7 month old is 15, Fred Thompson will be ... old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because they can afford it....
...and because they are still trying to prove that their jiz is as spunky as a 25-year olds. Here's the poster guy for old men having babies at a terminal age:



Jack Klugman and Tony Randall, who fathered a child at 77 and is pictured at 84 just prior to his death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blueberry_raspberry Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. So kids lost father at age 7. Sad.
I think Scotty of star trek fathered kid(s) at very advanced age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. "The time he has left"?
Edited on Fri Jun-01-07 08:10 PM by BerryBush
You mean, like, 10, 20, whatever years?

I mean, he's 60something, so I'm taking the average male lifespan into account. (An average lifespan is what he's supposed to have, given the nature of his particular type of lymphoma.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. dumbest . . .arguement. . .ever
the elderly shouldn't buy a car, refinance their home, go on a trip, leave their house.

If you are sick . . .just stay in bed. Nobody wants to see you lead a normal life.

Discuss the mans politics not his personal life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. if it's a fair question for Elizabeth and John Edwards it's fair for Thomson
the press made a big deal out of Elizabeth Edward's illness; fred should get the same scrutiny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It would be more relevant for the candidate than his/her spouse
If the candidate is running to be the President their health is of concern. Their spouse not so much so.

But the fundies will twist it all around to make black white and up down just like they have for 6+ years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. that assumes the question is fair
and it wasn't a fair question to ask about edward's health. 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. But...but...he looks so strong and wise on TV.
Like the Terminator, but more effete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmarie Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. On top of everything else
he's a dangerous liar.

The Bush Administration's Dilemma Regarding a Possible Libby Pardon - And How Outsiders Such as Fred Thompson Appear to Be Working on a Solution

By JOHN W. DEAN

~ snip ~

Frankly, I am not only stunned that Fred Thompson has taken up the "Free Scooter" campaign, but by the crude and thoughtless tactics he has employed. He has either lied or could not be troubled to inform himself of the facts before he attacked Special Counsel Fitzgerald.

Thompson, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney in Tennessee, gave an audience his assessment of the prosecution against Libby for perjury and obstruction of justice in a speech on May 12, 2007. He claims that the investigation was a sham from the outset: that there should have been no Special Counsel selected, and there never was any violation of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. Indeed, he claimed "that there was no violation of the law, by anyone, and everybody - the CIA, the Justice Department and the Special Counsel knew it. Ms. Plame was not a 'covered person' under the statute and it was obvious from the outset."

This is a remarkable charge - suggesting that the CIA referred the matter to the Justice Department knowing that Plame was not covered by the law; that the Justice Department commenced the investigation even though it had the same knowledge; and that the Special Counsel continued the investigation even though he, too, knew she was not covered. Yet why would Attorney General John Ashcroft's Justice Department have undertaken a baseless investigation? Why would a busy and highly-respected U.S. Attorney from Chicago take the assignment of Special Counsel if the law did not apply? And why would that same highly-respected U.S. Attorney make representations to a federal judge that the law did cover Valerie Plame, if it did not? It seems Fred Thompson has made a remarkably irresponsible charge.

"Furthermore," Thompson claimed, "Justice and the Special Counsel knew who leaked Plame's name and it wasn't Scooter Libby." Yet, Thompson added, "the Beltway machinery was well oiled and geared up so the Special Counsel … spent the next two years moving heaven and earth to come up with something, anything," and finally "came up with some inconsistent recollections by Scooter Libby." Inconsistent recollections? Apparently Thompson does not have a clue about the evidence that was presented at the trial, which proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Libby concocted a complex lie to explain away key behavior.

Nonetheless, based on his two-plus years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Thompson informed the audience, "In no other prosecutor's office in the country would a case like this one have been brought." Apparently, other prosecutors tolerate perjury and obstruction of justice. In addition, later in his speech, Thompson explained, "I have called for a pardon for Scooter Libby. When you rectify an injustice using the provisions of the law, just as when you reverse an erroneous court decision, you are not disregarding the rule of law, you are enforcing and protecting it."

That twisted report of the Special Counsel's investigation, and disturbing view on what to do about it is a bit frightening - especially coming from a man who wants to be president. But it is arguments like this that are the basis of the drive for leniency from Judge Walton, for a pardon, and, more broadly, for a change in public opinion regarding this case.

Much more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. He looked really bad in the photos when he announced.
Seriously, he looked like he had been made up for a death scene. He looked better than McCain, but still...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. I just wonder if he's white enough for conservatives?
Damn, those ginned-up media "controversies" just sound so stupid when placed in, well, just about any other context, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC