|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 05:47 AM Original message |
Big Mistake for any Dems to skip those FOX debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think they should have accepted the offer to debate too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichaelHarris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. said it once, said it a thousand times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. and how is that different that what W does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gobblechops (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It would be nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlyvi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
55. Dem candidates don't handpick their debate audiences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:50 AM Response to Reply #55 |
82. By ASSUMING nobody can be reached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gobblechops (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:14 AM Response to Original message |
4. I can see your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. its not about the network |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gobblechops (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. but its not a debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. there are not many oppurtunities.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
67. They will debate on CNN and the voters that wish to hear will listen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
44. I agree with you 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. It's ALL about the network. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. the election of '06 shows that to be wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
58. Over 80% of these repuke fucks still support the WAR CRIMINAL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
69. You delude yourself if you think we "need" FOX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:01 AM Response to Reply #69 |
74. Ever heard of Reagan Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:25 AM Response to Reply #74 |
78. There was no FOX during Reagan, sonny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:30 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. But there were undecided voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Change has come (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
64. It's not about the network |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
8. one has to take a stand against the forces that have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
9. It's not about fear, it's about avoiding a biased news source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:40 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. the election of '06... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ethelk2044 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
11. They should not attend the debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
13. Promoting Fox 'News'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. avoidance of potential critics and potential voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:13 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. So.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:18 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I am not a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. and you would deduce... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:33 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. the voter would never even consider the candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:44 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. and you would deduce... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 06:55 AM Response to Reply #31 |
72. excuses are easy to come by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlyvi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
50. So, debating on FOX is the only way to get your vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 06:58 AM Response to Reply #50 |
73. How do YOU know no voters could be reached by appearing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
59. Only mostly REPUKES watch Faux - that's a FACT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
14. If I were a candidate, it would be a perfect opportunity to outfox Fox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
15. Nonsense. FOX Propaganda needs to be shunned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 06:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I think it takes courage to go ON Faux Snooze and fight it out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:14 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. would you feel the same for the general election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #21 |
46. FOX does that anyway. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
70. I'm in favor of real Americans shunning propaganda machines. You aren't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:05 AM Response to Reply #70 |
75. I am not defending fox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:24 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. You think the reason to boycott FOX is "because its too hard"???????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:34 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. hurling insults won"t change a thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
19. You forgot the :sarcasm: tag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
23. I disagree. They were wise not to give that vulgar little man and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
25. Anyone tuning inot FOX will NOT be doing so to hear the candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:16 AM Response to Reply #25 |
76. and How do you think they will be treated in their absence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
27. You're really wrong on this one ca |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
28. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 07:40 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. how odd that you would.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sukie1941 (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 08:14 AM Response to Original message |
32. Who besides Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
33. I agree, and it is a bit condescending to the Congressional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
34. Just saying no to the Republican Propaganda Outlet Helps its Viewers De-Program |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
35. fox will control the message no matter what the candidate does or doesn't say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
36. Stop Building Up Fox as a Political Outlet. They are losing viewers. Let the trend continue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
37. This is about standing up for democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
38. The learned that the stink doesn't come out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
39. Really not smart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StudentsMustUniteNow (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
40. CNN's not much better than FOX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LBJDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Did you see the MSNBC debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StudentsMustUniteNow (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I disagree. FOX unfairly grilled Paul about "inviting 9/11" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Counterpunch is no better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
some guy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #42 |
53. "Unfairly grilled" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StudentsMustUniteNow (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #53 |
65. Good point SomeGuy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. The FOX debate was excellent, and Giuliani grilled Paul, not FOX. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
43. I don't think it's a mistake at all for the top tier candidates to not go.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
45. I could not more strongly disagree with you on this. It is not about "handling" Hannity. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jade Fox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
47. Nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
48. I thought it was all about getting votes and winning the election - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jade Fox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Moderates watch Fox News? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
49. It's Just So RIGHT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
56. FWIW.. I Say DON'T Go! WHO Cares What THEY Think?? It Matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
57. Totally disagree - you couldn't be more WRONG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
60. Totally agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jillian (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
61. What about those Republicans out there that are so fed up with this admin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
62. Fox needs to be marginalized... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
63. Any Dem who attends is a fool and a panderer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StudentsMustUniteNow (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. MSM is MSM. CNN and MSNBC are no better n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. There's a qualitative difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-02-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
71. ANYTHING Fox News Does Is Akin To a TRAP!! I Don't Trust ANYTHING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #71 |
79. The Nominee will eventually appear there come GE time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-03-07 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
83. "If you can't handle Sean Hannity don't even pretend you can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC