Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Dems Show Historic Level of Unity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 12:41 PM
Original message
House Dems Show Historic Level of Unity
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/06/house_democrats_historically_u.html

House Dems Show Historic Level of Unity
Paul Kane

House Democrats are voting with such unity that, if continued throughout the 110th Congress, their cohesion would be unparalleled in recent congressional history.

Through the first five months of the year, the average House Democrat has voted with a majority of his/her caucus colleagues on 94 percent of the 425 roll calls. Enjoying their honeymoon period, 110 Democrats -- nearly half of the 232 Democrats -- have sided with a majority of the caucus on at least 98 percent of the votes cast this year.

Consider this: Rep. Adam Putnam (R-Fla.) has been the most partisan Republican in the 110th Congress, voting with a GOP majority on 98 percent of votes. But if someone prints out the washingtonpost.com's chart of most partisan voters in the House, they will have to turn through eight and a half pages of House Democrats before they see Putnam's red-headed mug shot (Rep. Charles Norwood R-Ga., who died on Feb. 13 and cast only nine votes in the 110th Congress, is the lone exception.)

No other caucus of House Republicans or Democrats has maintained such a unified voting bloc over a two-year Congress, according to washingtonpost.com's vote tracking feature.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! With that kind of unity this war should be over in no time!
Oh...never mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do I detect a note of sarcasm? Hmmm?
:spray: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Me? Sarcastic? What ever do you mean?
I'd never use sarcasm, especially not in this reply right here. Nope, not me.

O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dems have to be united. Between them, they appear to be sharing only one set of balls.
The minute Mr. Feingold leaves the room, they all start singing soprano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So women are inherently weak and disorganized?
It must be because of their non-spherical genitalia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Women can have balls, too.
Edited on Sat Jun-02-07 02:57 PM by IanDB1
Barbara Boxer has a huge set of brass ones.

Barbara Boxer's balls are so big, that twice a year they block out the sun.

But in women, their balls are called "ovaries."

"Balls" is a metaphor.



Shown here: Democrats admire one of Barbara Boxers balls, and wonder where they might find one for themselves.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. BEST. POST. OF. THE. WEEK!!
:rofl:

It would be funnier if it weren't so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. We should all mail inflatable beachballs to our congress-critters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. We've got a great Speaker of the House. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. She's apparently loaned her balls to someone else for the time being.
I'm not ready to throw her under the bus right now, but she would certainly do well to seek them out and get back to us soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. In what way is she great?
Name one tangible result from Congress since Pelosi took over. There's been a lot of fireworks, but not so much in the area of actual change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC