Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sunday, nauseating Sunday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 12:57 PM
Original message
Sunday, nauseating Sunday
Being a Z-list political blogger and all, I know it's my duty to watch the Sunday pundit shows.

Yet when each Lord's day rolls around, I duck and cover like a well-connected Republican during a military draft.

But bloggers never quit, and quitters never blog.

So, today I challenged myself to make it through either "The Chris Matthews Show" or "Meet The Press."

Like they sang in the old Lay's potato chips commercials: "he tried, but he couldn't do it."

On Matthews, I'd swear that excrement is literally spewing from Joe Klein's piehole, as he insightfully opines that Hillary and Bill in the White House would be an unthinkable return to those best-forgotten 1990s.

On Timmy's show, "Republican strategist" Mike Murphy bloviates that "Nixon is spinning in his grave. We used to be the very competent guys that run wars. Now, my view is our magnificent military and the Bush administration won the war. The Iraqi people have lost the politics of the peace." Damn you, Iraqi people, for defiling the legacy of war-president extraordinaire Richard M. Nixon! Let it weigh heavy on your souls!

TV. Off. Now.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nixon is roasting in hell
Vietnam was competent? Doesn't competence imply actually winning a war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What!? You don't think...
Edited on Sun Jun-03-07 01:26 PM by lwcon
a "secret plan" to end the war that consisted of continuing and escalating the war for four more years before admitting it was unwinnable is competent?

Sadly, each day of Bush makes the Nixon years look more like a golden era of leadership. In fact, when Bush finally shipped off to Southeast Asia, he showed that he didn't figure out what even Nixon had:

"We hear voices calling for us to retreat from the world and close our doors to these opportunities," the president said in a speech at the National University of Singapore. "These are the old temptations of isolationism and protectionism, and America must reject them."


___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I put most of the blame of the Vietnam war on Johnson.
Nixon could have hero-ed by putting an end to it but waited until congress put a gun to his head. I just hope that the next president is a Democrat and that he/she knows how to stop a war. Remember that WWI or WWII are not an example to learn from. Ending an illegal war is a whole new ball game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Johnson's hands were very dirty re: Vietnam, of course...
But he at least recognized the shame of his failure. Nixon, as I noted in a previous comment, ran under the pretense of having a plan to end the war, and not only did he not end it during his first term, he started spreading it into neighboring countries.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nixon Had a "Secret Plan" to End the War
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The secret was that he intended to let it drag out
until he was out of office and maybe stick a Democrat with the blame for defeat.

Who knew?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually, His "Secret Plan" Was to NUKE Hanoi. Really
Edited on Sun Jun-03-07 02:32 PM by AndyTiedye
Fortunately, saner people prevailed and prevented that.

In the Bush** regime, all the sane people have been purged,
so if dear leader decides to nuke Iran, that's what will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Andy...
Could you suggest a good link that documents that? Sounds eminently plausible, but like the Watergate co-conspirators, I don't remember that at this particular point in time.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Kissinger was one of those "saner" people...
Kind of scary that Kissinger was the voice of reason in that crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentProgressive Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I met Matthews once
He's a celebrity tabloid journalist. He's more concerned with fawning over one superhero politician or another than getting to matters of what the people want and why the hell aren't the politicians working for us.

Sort of the anti-Amy Goodman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He clearly gets high off the Beltway fumes
He doesn't much care which way the wind blows, his supposed Tip O'Neill cred notwithstanding.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentProgressive Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. One thing he said though
My friend who was with me at the time is a huge fan of his and keeps quoting this back to me.

Matthews said Gingrich is a "terrible person" and he's really afraid of seeing him run for President or something to that extent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That stuff just makes Tweety worse
He knows how bad these guys are, but he spends more than half his time sucking up to them.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sucking Up to Repiglcan Pols Is Tweety's JOB
That is what the network hires him to do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC