|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:07 PM Original message |
Would someone please explain to me how people can believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. She, like many, was told it was OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. No. The word came down from the WH. The EPA issued a report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. "so uncuriously did Senator Clinton." You got some proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Months later. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. You just said she signed off on the EPA report issued the week afetr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. She didn't start denouncing the EPA until Dec -- according to your link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. IOW, you were not being truthful earlier when you said she signed off on it (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. She was there. Was she there against her own will? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. How is her banging the gavel (a ceremonial position) = signing off on it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Why was she there? Why wasn't she looking into the conditions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Now you're blaming Clinton for not overseeing sample taking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
78. No, I'm not doing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. So now she risked her daughter's life or are you going to admit she did not know the air was toxic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #80 |
88. Oh, please. Tell you what. Why don't we pretend that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #88 |
101. Deleted message |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #101 |
107. And you seem to have no problem with fictionalizing my views |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsdsharp (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. The head of the EPA -- the former Governor of New Jersey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. So, how naive do you have to be to accept such a report? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jilln (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I think many people knew it at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Or, to reassure Wall Street. Likely, both. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. would someone please explain this non-sequitur to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Because you know and I know this person is very intelligent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
56. Still doesn't answer onenote's question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #56 |
115. Grasping for straws? I hope not. It just occurred to me today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. It's grasping for straws because it has nothing to do with universal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. There are thousands of people whose health has been impacted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. It's not obvious what that has to do with their health COVERAGE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shenmue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. I was wondering that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
4. my car wouldn't start this A.M. -- efffin Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. What crap. There was ash everywhere. Fires were still burning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. crap? crap is conveniently dumping crap on someone gratuitously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I posted a picture of her standing there when we know the air |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. You mean where we NOW know, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. What we NOW know? Plenty of us knew the EPA was full of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. "Plenty of us knew the EPA was full of it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Google is your friend. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. Deleted message |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Okay, I'll go fish. And I'll overlook your tone because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. what I believe is what I've come to know as the techniques of bashing at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
71. DU is criminal because I pointed out that Clinton helped open |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Deleted message |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Well, no. I pointed out that Clinton had no problem inviting people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #76 |
129. your OP is a ridiculous non sequitur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #57 |
135. Yes indeed it is sad. What is funny, is they think they are clever, when in fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #135 |
139. amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Two seconds, first link. Oh, and thanks for the personal attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. no mention of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. no mention of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. And not a single link saying disagreement earlier than Oct. 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Right. Exactly. Where was she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. On Sept 10th 2003? I'm not sure where she was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Well, then you assume a good deal. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. no mention of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. nice extrapolation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Oct 6th 2001 memo that came out in 2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #55 |
72. don't confuse a personal attack for being annoyed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Your observation, you provide the links (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. "Clinton agreed to that. She wasn't careful, to say the least" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Did you not see the jpg I posted of her at the NYSE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. Deleted message |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. It's not my theory but observation. And comfort yourself by attacking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. IOW, no proof. Just BS from someone who been shown to not be truthful (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Circular argument. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. non sequitur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #53 |
91. Not at all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #91 |
128. your OP is a textbook non sequitur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
65. so does that mean she knowingly put her own health at risk? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. Well, who if not a state senator should advocate for caution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. The NYSE and the WTC are around 3/4 miles apart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Oh, for pete's sake Do the same search. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. "I don't pretend to know all there is to know" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. That should be the death kneel but it won't be (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #82 |
86. apparently not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. Tell that to the first responders who are dying, onenote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. And you tell them how you're attacking their biggest advocate in Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. What color of kool aid do you favor? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nick303 (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-08-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #99 |
148. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MistressOverdone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. Maybe this would inspire her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Yes, because so many more people would be so utterly helpless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
11. Deleted message |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Info Wars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. I take it back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. But she was there, cheerleading the re opening of the NYSE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. Can you explain to me why you ignore Hillary's record dealing with this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. So, she helped open a toxic site but her work since should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. She helped open? It was Hillary's decision to reopen the NYSE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Your hyperbole doesn't minimize her complicity. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Was it Hillary's decison to reopen the NYSE or is that another thing that is not true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Complicity. What kind of leader would be complicit in that scenario? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #42 |
70. So what should she have done? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #70 |
83. Isn't that what we would call leadership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Calling off the search for people and not showing up in a ceremonial capacity is leadership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. I didn't say that. I said it was irresponsible for her to help reopen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. She did something you deem irresponsible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. No, I didn't say that. I said why would you believe she'd fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #95 |
106. She's fought for health care before and she'll do it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. She'll do that over the bodies of hundreds if not thousands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. That Hillary, she's a mass-murderess! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Who did you lose? Anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. What the hell are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. I agree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #90 |
98. Except she did not help reopen the NYSE. She banged a ceremonial gavel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Because cermony, especially carried all over the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. So was the NYSE not going to reopen if Clinton did not show? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. That doesn't speak to her complicity, does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. No, it speaks to your obvious dishonesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. My dishonesty? Forgive me for noticing your sacred cows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shenmue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm sorry, how would not opening the NYSE have helped? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Um, not inviting people back into a toxic crime scene |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
121. And where is the proof that the NYSE was "toxic"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #121 |
137. she don't need no stinkin' proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #137 |
144. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #144 |
147. Hey, it beats working, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
20. I don't understand how any Democrat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
140. So, can Hillary count on your vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #140 |
145. Absolutely, Hillary can count on my vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. * seriously * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
37. So now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. ya know, come to think of it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. No. It's not blaming Senator Clinton for everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
85. Bill is God. Hillary is only His wife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. No, not the cruxifixcion but I would expect her to have good info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
94. "Can someone explain that to me? " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. Apparently not. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
108. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. No. Because she encouraged people to go back to lower Manhattan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #109 |
120. So did Robert De Niro. String him up! NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-06-07 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
119. Just when I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:48 AM Response to Reply #119 |
123. they have been rather desperate, silly, and juvenile lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:41 AM Response to Original message |
122. They watch TV... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #122 |
124. You got that right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
125. there was an environmental group doing their own studies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
126. wait, I'm confused, was she mayor of New York City at the time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
127. I'm Actually Kind of Astonished |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #127 |
131. Astonished, really? --- It's quintessential DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. Simply because YOU can't find a connection between someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. your accusation is absurd -- your conclusion unbelievably convoluted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. Um, the OP makes no accusation and my question is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #134 |
136. try again? yeah, you definitely should consider going back to the drawing board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #136 |
141. Again, a non response to my question. Just more bs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #134 |
138. No accusation? Not some kind of rabid attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #138 |
142. Personal attacks are no substitute for actual thought. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. That's a personal attack but your OP is not an attack on Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-09-07 02:50 AM Response to Reply #143 |
149. Can you distinguish between an attack and a question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-07-07 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
130. '...our first responders worked there with no or little protection.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-09-07 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
150. If the EPA report was false how was she supposed to know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 04:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC