|
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 04:15 PM by EST
I have spent a lot of cogitating time grinding on this very one. After watching republickers, I have concluded that first and foremost they see themselves as republicans. After that, they do what publickers do, which is advocate publicker causes and attitudes and then make up a lot of high sounding justifications to appear ethical and, perhaps, delude whatever bit of conscience that may still be clinging to a margin of existence. I did not wake up one day and discover that I was a democrat.
Matter of fact, although I champion most democratic causes and philosophies, I am not even registered as a dem, but that's another story, altogether.
I make a conscious and unconscious attempt in every situation to behave as ethically and as responsibly as I am capable of discerning. Even in my private thoughts, I hold up the measuring stick and compare my own empathy, compassion, morality and selfishness to the standards that I would demand of anyone. I am rarely completely satisfied with the comparison, but it's getting better all the time.
In christian, freewill baptist terminology, it's called "pray without ceasing," a Christian directive.
In this life long pursuit of perfection (perfect as in complete) I looked around for the group of enlightened citizens and voters most closely aligned with the way activists and responsible creatures should be in my little imaginary perfect world.
I do not do "democrat" in order to have a banner to do battle under, but I can pretty easily see that, in this imperfect world (as in ideal) republicans lie more than democrats. Republicans cheat and steal more than democrats. Republicans gratuitously hurt and damage other humans more than do democrats.
Republicans seem to be affected with abject xenophobia and spend their precious time covering it up with sweet smiling ugliness, while democrats seem more likely to embrace change and thrive on humane solutions, even though they may be terrified at times. More flexible and less hidebound.
Democrats tend to be longer on self evaluation and questioning of motives than republicans.
In my world, calling someone a republican is perilously close to being a thinly veiled insult while calling someone a democrat or a liberal is not.
Democrats are a lot less likely to attempt sexual liaison with entities than are not responsible for themselves, such as horses, mules, sheep, dogs or immature humans.
Conscience seems a more useful and more often used tool to democrats than to republicans.
Republicans like to emulate disrupters, haters and other nasty actors more than do democrats.
Democrats are more likely to worry about what others think of them without elevating it to guilty paranoia.
Democrats are, unfortunately, much more likely to be Charlie Brown than Lucy with the football. They get jerked over way too much, but that encourages my sympathy and empathy. Root for the underdog, I guess.
For these and many, many other reasons, I find myself more closely aligned with democrats than I do republicans, not perfectly-there are too many differences for that-but, on the whole, this is where I will stand and fight, build my church, draw the line in the sand.
What ever it needs to be called, my ethical and moral sense feels a hell of a lot more comfortable on this side of the line than it ever could on that one.
|