Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Hillary ever state why she chose an Impeached Judge as Campaign Co-Chair?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:13 PM
Original message
Did Hillary ever state why she chose an Impeached Judge as Campaign Co-Chair?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/6/7/125111/4009

Did we ever receive an answer why Hillary chose this corrupt judge to be her campaign co-chair last week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hastings? Prove he was corrupt, please
Yeah, I know the GOP impeached him ... then he was elected to congress. The dude was acquitted in court, btw, but still removed by the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Democats controlled the Senate at that time. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. what does (nt) mean? I see people adding that to posts. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. (nt) = no text, eom = end of message. Basically its one line the subject with no body text (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. thanks. (nt) :-))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yeah, but I was paying attention at the time ... see this article
2 G.O.P. Congressmen Move to Impeach Judge

AP
Published: March 24, 1987
LEAD: Two conservative Republican Congressmen introduced an impeachment resolution today against Federal District Judge Alcee L. Hastings of Miami, who was acquitted in 1983 of charges of conspiring to solicit a $150,000 bribe from two convicted racketeers.

Two conservative Republican Congressmen introduced an impeachment resolution today against Federal District Judge Alcee L. Hastings of Miami, who was acquitted in 1983 of charges of conspiring to solicit a $150,000 bribe from two convicted racketeers.

The one-sentence resolution was introduced by Representatives Henry J. Hyde of Illinois and F. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin. It was referred to a House Judiciary subcommittee headed by Representative John Conyers Jr., a Michigan Democrat who is reported to have expressed doubt about whether the House should proceed with the Hastings case.

http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F40715FF3A5B0C778EDDAA0894DF484D81
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I gotcha. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I gotcha. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Dear me, who appeared in her court and didn't walk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Yes, it was a very odd case

~snip~ Impeachment from District Court

In 1979, Hastings was appointed a federal judge for the Southern District of Florida by President Jimmy Carter. Two years later, Hastings was indicted on charges of conspiring to solicit a bribe from two defendants awaiting sentencing in his court. Hastings was unanimously acquitted of the charges in 1983.

The Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, however, soon launched a separate investigation into the matter which lasted nearly four years. Ultimately, the council (which was led by former Watergate prosecutor John Doar and comprised of the active appeals court judges for that circuit and three U.S. District judges) found that Hastings was not only guilty of the initial charges, but also that he repeatedly lied during his trial. Following this report, the House Judiciary Committee approved seventeen articles of impeachment against Hastings. Sixteen dealt with the bribery case, while one centered around Hastings' improper revelation of sensitive government information obtained through a federal wiretap in 1985. In late 1988, the articles passed the House by a vote of 413-3. The Senate, following a trial by a twelve-member committee, chose to convict Hastings on eight of the articles, but opted not to restrict him from seeking federal elected office in the future (which it had the authority to do). ~snip~

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Alcee_Hastings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow
The media killed Nancy Pelosi over Hastings. Right about the same time Hillary was helping the media destroy Kerry. Now she puts Hastings as co-chair?? Well I'll be. That makese no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. It does not make sense to me either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hastings is a long time Congressman at this point.
But hey if you're so desperate to attack Clinton you go after other Democrats, we know where you stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm sorry, but IMO any corrupt Democrat should not be involved in public office...
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 05:25 PM by TeamJordan23
nor in presidental campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Where has Hastings been corrupt as a Congressman?
Not that I think it was the most brilliant tactical move on Hillary Clinton's part because its an easy attack but Hastings will be a big part of winning in FL come the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. how true. otherwise we are no better than the GOP
I am so proud that we are passing such strong ethics refor. . . . . uh, er.

strike that last comment from the record.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Let's you know where the campaign is heading
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. One campaign believes in redemption and a 10 year Congressman.
The other cmapaign apparently has elements that believe in the cheapest of attacks from the sleaziest of sources even if its against fellow Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. Both Clinton campaigns are known for cheap attacks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yep right to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. *snarf*
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Goodness, more smear with zero substance.
Having a busy day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Is it a Fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Jeez - I guess redemption is just not possible to DUers
He was impeached 20 years ago. He was validly elected to Congress and has been re-elected ever since and has served honorably without a hint of scandal.

Maybe Hillary recognizes that people should be judged on their current behavior, especially one who seems to have worked his ass off for the past 20 years redeeming himself.

And maybe she also knows a little something about what a bullshit, political process impeachment can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
23. "Published: March 24, 1987" - wow... the muck rakers are digging deep!!
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
27. That is a good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
28. Why did she choose Terry McAuliffe - he tanked the last 2 election
That's a choice I don't understand. This man was responsible to advice for the Gore and the Kerry campaign which left them looking odd. When you hear and see Gore being himself you see a different man then the one in 2000. If Gore had been himself he would have won by a lot bigger margin that the Republicans could not have overcome with their corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Good Point
Al is a very likeable person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Isn't he an elected Dem?
Edited on Sat Jun-23-07 09:43 PM by draft_mario_cuomo
So not only are you "smearing" HRC but an elected Democratic congressman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. Jordan, because it kinda goes along with the rest of her crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC