|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-16-07 12:19 PM Original message |
Why did the Clintons liquidate their blind trust? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-16-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. Federal law requires presidential candidates to reveal their financial assets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-16-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. no, they will have a big tax bite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-16-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
2. Presidential candidates cannot have a blind trust. So when they found what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-16-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. presidential candidates cannot hold the same blind trusts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-17-07 12:48 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Is this why Bush's is real blind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-17-07 10:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. as far as I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-16-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. I still don't understand how cheney can keep his Halliburton stock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-17-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
8. I worry the Clinton's are worried about the Economy Tanking and they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-17-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Who said that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Similar sentiments in a WSJ editorial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Consider the source (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC