|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:23 AM Original message |
the timing of the clark withdrawal...a move to hurt Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. I don't think it was to purposely hurt Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. Clark was in the running in TN - He/We wanted to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susanna
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 01:05 AM Response to Reply #2 |
96. No kidding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgpenn
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
4. Your Kidding Right?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. At some point we need to stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgpenn
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Who is 'bashing"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. no doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgpenn
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. This is where you and I are totally in disagreement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. yea it stinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 03:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
60. Dean imploded????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgpenn
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 04:21 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. I'm not even going to dignify that with a response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
74. Wasn't that a response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:41 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. no. i'm not kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:58 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
76. It's not BS, its concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgpenn
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
66. What's really amazing about this Edwards guy is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
90. Entered the race the same day Edwards did to take the shine of Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikehiggins
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
5. If Clark had beaten Edwards significantly we wouldn't be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Virginia & Tenneessee Were Open Primaries. GOP Voted Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
50. Do you have evidence of this? My understanding is that the Dem convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:46 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Republicans aren't allowed to vote in primaries???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:48 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Not for presidential primaries. The Dems will not seat delegates from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:52 PM Response to Reply #52 |
75. So, in other words, my vote has never counted in a primary election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. that was a funny right? LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. No, I've been thinking about this all day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 07:22 PM Response to Reply #75 |
86. I'm repeating what I was told by DU'ers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:56 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. Until the autobiography is written we'll never know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
9. Well, if Clark knew Kerry was the candidate he would endorse, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
12. What suprises me ............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Clarks a pragmatist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:43 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. that quick turnaround is part of what started me thinking along these line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. I don't think Clark stayed in the race to "split" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
67. Look, it's clear Rove/Sludge had been sitting on the Kerry intern story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kinkistyle
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #12 |
33. How long would you like Clark to wait? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 03:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
62. I think the timing of that endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskerDem
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
19. No, Clark wanted to win the presidency - His strongest ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
21. If "polling that showed no victory" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:01 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Best answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
22. Everything Clark has done has been aimed at hurting Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Ya mean - Clark wanted to win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:11 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Speaking about Edwards and Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:16 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. thanks for that post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kinkistyle
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:43 AM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Exactly. Aren't Dean and Kerry also "out to get Edwards" as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:56 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Dean seems to be aiming at Kerry, not so much at Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kinkistyle
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. What do mean? Clark's worst mudslinging was against Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. I think the comment about rank ended up helping Kerry, but I also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 05:30 AM Response to Reply #39 |
101. If Edwards was winning things, this conversation wouldn't be going on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:53 AM Response to Reply #26 |
36. I'm not lashing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
38. Clark wanted to win. Clark wants Kerry to win. Clark might not want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestMomma
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:08 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. You are right that Clark does not want Edwards to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:31 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Maybe it's because Clark wants to run against Bush in 2008 rather than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:08 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. Clark has accepted what will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tim_in_HK
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:46 AM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Wow, you must be a saint. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgpenn
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 04:25 PM Response to Reply #22 |
64. Like the way Edwards said he TIED with Clark in Ok.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:31 PM Response to Reply #64 |
71. Clark almost quit after his OK performance because they basically tied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:34 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. spin cycle on max? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:44 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. I lack the enthusiasm to argue with these people anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 06:04 PM Response to Reply #71 |
81. That is not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 07:21 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. Edwards in the last three days was down by a lot and, could be wrong, he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 08:36 PM Response to Reply #71 |
87. That Is A LIE! Edwards Spent MILLIONS AND MONTHS On Oklahoma |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 05:32 AM Response to Reply #71 |
102. BWAHAHA! This thing is making me salivate to see Edwards lose. Since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
29. Wouldn't it hurt Edwards more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
30. Clark split military vote with Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestMomma
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:54 AM Response to Reply #30 |
37. I agree with your analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
40. The military vote isn't that big. It's a small subset of the southern vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kinkistyle
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:06 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Right. "War", "Terror", "National Security". These words are meaningless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:33 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. That's homefiled advantage for Republcians. Max Cleland couldn't win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. By military vote I meant to include |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. The media will turn off the military vote imperative as soon as Kerry is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 12:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. I was hoping someone would reply to this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 01:08 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Maybe you forgot you were talking to Clark supporters in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
andym
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 01:03 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. My prediction: Kerry will adopt a form of populism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 01:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Leno's joke last night: Kerry's solution: find a rich country like Switz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 05:37 AM Response to Reply #55 |
103. And Edwards down home stories about growing up poor don't wash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 02:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
58. Some of us bleedin heart librals care about Nat Sec too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. Than support a nominee who can beat Bush in Nov instead of one who' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:01 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. You are a tireless advocate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot
![]() ![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
31. ## Support Democratic Underground! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funky_bug
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
32. I'm going to lean towards "No" with some "Yes" thrown in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
57. Kerry was always the only choice for Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hope42mro
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
79. Well said Jersey n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 06:08 PM Response to Reply #57 |
82. Thanks for the Boston Globe quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
59. Whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
61. Yes, everything revolves around Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:19 PM Response to Reply #61 |
70. NO, Kerry needed to wrap things up, Clark knew it was over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. How come other ppl. STILL can't figure out it's over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 08:42 PM Response to Reply #78 |
88. where did I blame Clark ? I credited Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:27 PM Response to Reply #88 |
93. Point taken. Thanks for the clarification. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
65. remember Clark almost quit after he barely won OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 06:14 PM Response to Reply #65 |
83. Problem is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. so the papers say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. It's what people around the campaign say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Sat Feb-14-04 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
84. I don't think so. Dean didn't stay in to hurt Clark and isn't staying in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
94. Nah. It was the last nail in Dean's coffin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susanna
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
95. Let me vent here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 03:10 AM Response to Reply #95 |
99. And let me add something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
97. It never ends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kool Kitty
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 02:48 AM Response to Reply #97 |
98. And, don't forget the good ole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 03:14 AM Response to Reply #98 |
100. What a Concept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC