|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:03 PM Original message |
Why didn't Hillary just say no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Think about it....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I know...her husband's pardons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. I'm certain she wouldn't. But still, her instinct is to dodge the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. That's too bad... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katrinepa2 (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
67. The Sad Thing is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. Mr. Wonderful Chris Matthews asked her the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 07:07 AM Response to Reply #72 |
91. "Put her on the spot?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #72 |
94. Consider what they committed purjury about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #72 |
121. Tweety is phychologically 'obsessed' over Hiliary. I am glad she responded as she did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. Mr. Wonderful Chris Matthews asked her the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Right on! It's completely unfair to make Clinton answer controversial questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
68. It means she won't say either way. So if she's elected, don't count on anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmocat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Yep ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. But still... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arendt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 07:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
90. Which is exactly why she is a flawed candidate...Bill can be a weak spot, ethically n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 07:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
92. When has the RW STOPPED talking about Clinton pardons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. Two answers, take your pick: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. or, of course, a third answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. If she hasn't been paying close attention to this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. close attention is much different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
63. The legal points are crystal clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 07:02 AM Response to Reply #63 |
89. So i assume you are, in fact, a L1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 07:16 AM Response to Reply #89 |
93. She is running for president, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #93 |
96. fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #96 |
103. But then why didn't she say THAT?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #103 |
115. Becaue it would cost her votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #96 |
114. Again, she's running for president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. ahhh ...an answer that makes sense! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 08:24 AM Response to Reply #15 |
122. That would have been an excellant response from Hil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Points for Kelvin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. Bill's pardons had nothing to do with national security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
65. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #65 |
98. Marc Rich had EVERYTHING to do with national security -- BCCI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #98 |
105. Nice how one hand washes the other... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
70. #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. You're probably right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because she has no core beliefs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Sadly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. Oh, bull! It's because she's experienced Swiftboat tactics for a very long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realbluesky (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
46. If you don't know by now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #46 |
82. Yeah, whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Honestly, I don't care about her core beliefs or anyone elses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTD (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
30. Yup. She can't tell you her position without someone taking a poll first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #30 |
97. Or without collecting a donation first n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hill knows how much Tweety despises her. She wanted to show him up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I think Tweety wants to see a "subway series," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Tweety's mission: Derail the Hillary express. Matthews hates all things Clinton.(n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
62. Ya think? Then why is he constantly talking about her? I think he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #12 |
77. I think Tweety wants a three-way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. That aggravates me too--she should have jsut said no. And if it's because of Bill's pardons, well-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Great minds, yada yada... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. It was a BS gotcha question by Tweety and the audience called him on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I think she should've answered it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. Because she's like a reed blowing in the wind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. It depends on the meaning of what "pardon" is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lobster Martini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
23. Possibly because if she said no, the irony would be rich--Marc Rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Yes, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTD (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Exactly. Bill pardoned Marc Rich, who was represented by Libby. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Every guest on those type shows get asked that question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. David Shuster just said Hillary brought down the house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. No shit! It's like the media has been bought and paid for by the Hillaryites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Yup... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. You ask, "Why are they hyping her?" Think about it. Really, think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Because the CEOs who RUN the M$N want HRC to win the Primaries so a Republican ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. Bullcrap!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTD (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Wow. Such denial. Seek treatment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
78. Such eloquence. This is why Clinton's supporters are winning over DUers in droves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eweaver155 (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
35. She never answers a real question come on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. I'd think she'd answer it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Was the question directed to any other candidates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eweaver155 (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. That was a rightful question Her husband pardoned someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. No. She was the first one questioned... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eweaver155 (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. He should have pushed for an answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. I agree. He caved. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
42. Because lawyers are shared between Libby and Rich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTD (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Libby REPRESENTED Rich in his pardon request to Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Tks, but it's not neo-con, it's even more evil: "Corporations First and Always" - Big Money! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Red Knight (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
48. LOL! She represents the progressive wing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. I agree with your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. The Guy with Shuster now is dis' ing the CIA and says that we should strike on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. Wes Clark is now an MSNBC analyst... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
52. The answer, all three main variants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
57. she really didn't get a chance to elucidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
59. Shuster KEEPS trying to minimize Obama! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
60. These people live in a different world than we do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
61. Shuster's definitely in the tank for Hillary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eweaver155 (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. It is a bunch of BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. I know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
69. She can barely speak without triangulating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eweaver155 (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Make me have to get Pepto to ease my stomach when I hear it at times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
79. blurr, triangulate and blame the moderator are the clintons games. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 09:29 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I wonder what she would've said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
81. I missed it - anyone have a link to a clip? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-19-07 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
83. She didn't just say no? Maybe she was jonesing for a toke! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
84. Force of habit, she had to think ahead of when she might want to pardon a crook. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 06:10 AM Response to Reply #84 |
87. Her mind, the M$M has fully anointed HRC as *inevitable* based merely on the last poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
85. Penn prolly didn't have the results from focus group. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 05:22 AM Response to Original message |
86. Just saw the clip over at Huffington Post.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #86 |
101. I saw it when she was asked that morning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-21-07 03:09 AM Response to Reply #101 |
116. My apology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-21-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. No problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
88. So now the standard for HRC is that she has to answer BS questions quickly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #88 |
95. No, but she does have to ANSWER the question. It was a simple question. She dodged. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #95 |
102. Exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-21-07 07:22 AM Response to Reply #95 |
117. I didn't see the clip, but my understanding was that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-21-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. No. I saw the whole thing, and as I posted earlier... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
99. Because she knows how to control an interview... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #99 |
100. How hard is it to say no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. Ridiculous straw man talking point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #104 |
106. Talking point from where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. The whole ridiculous Marc Rich speculation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. I see no straw man. She should've answered "no." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. I disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. So she should get to answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. What politician... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. I just think she should've answered the question. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-20-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. No compelling reason too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingstree (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 08:52 AM Response to Reply #113 |
124. She never can answer a question straight out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 08:30 AM Response to Reply #109 |
123. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
120. This thread is based on incorrect information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #120 |
133. You're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
125. I'm surprised her campaign hasn't already prepared an answer for that question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. What makes you think this wasn't the prepared answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. It was pretty sh*tty for a prepared answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Did you see the clip? It was a nearly perfect non-answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Yes, I saw it when she gave it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. I don't think it was a simple question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
126. Deleted message |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
132. I can't imagine how anyone wouldn't say no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. Say no to what? "No, I would not have a comment if Bush pardons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. You know what s/he meant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. There is a big difference! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. As you pointed out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. Which puts her in a position of having to forswear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #138 |
141. Please... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. Yes. And Clinton's "crime" was not answering directly within 5 seconds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. I don't really agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. You've said yourself that the answer might require further explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
139. Her boy Carville wants Libby pardoned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #139 |
142. That is B.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-22-07 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
140. It would probably depend on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC