|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
MrSoundAndVision
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:47 PM Original message |
Look all this talk on 'voting third party is a vote for Bush' ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NWHarkness
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. And I hope you enjoy 4 more years of Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. "Those who do not stand with the President, stands with the Terrorists!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sagan
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yeah, well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Interesting.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:14 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. edit: What Sagan said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:26 AM Response to Reply #21 |
34. ABB message is counter-productive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:38 AM Response to Reply #34 |
47. That's not necessarily what ABB means, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:45 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. That's exactly what my "standard response" is meant for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:50 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Yes, of course I notice those responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:58 AM Response to Reply #56 |
64. For clarification: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sagan
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:20 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. If that is your explanation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:22 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Very well said. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:33 AM Response to Reply #27 |
44. By stating my "standard response".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zoeyfong
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
93. Back at ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. that's not going to work this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. yep a vote for a pro free trade cannidate is a vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peeance Freeance
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
4. Third party vote or staying home is one less vote Bush has to earn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. (Votes for Kerry) - 1 < (Votes for Kerry) + 1=4 more of chimp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
101. Lyszenkoism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSoundAndVision
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kanary
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
71. That's a VERY big "IF" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anti_shrub
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. I just don't understand the logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. if freetradeis your issuethan they mightmean a texasgoper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSoundAndVision
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:09 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:11 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. the texas gop has a more progressive view on free trade than kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SEAburb
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #19 |
107. since when is a backward step called "progressive"? //nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSoundAndVision
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:47 AM Response to Reply #15 |
100. Excellent, MrSound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. You can put lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSoundAndVision
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Well I am... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:25 AM Response to Reply #16 |
30. I don't respond to emotional extortion or blackmail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes, I enjoyed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
13. Make that argument to all of the families of dead soldiers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSoundAndVision
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. I'd say a lot to them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Deleted message |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:25 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:53 AM Response to Reply #31 |
59. increase how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:00 AM Response to Reply #59 |
65. Quoth Kerry: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. So he's counting on 40,000 new recruits? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. puhlease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 02:02 AM Response to Reply #69 |
83. Double reply (incl to Forkboy) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 02:47 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. So he plans on using the poor to stock the Armed Services then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 03:05 AM Response to Reply #86 |
87. No, he plans in making America stronger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:26 AM Response to Reply #20 |
33. I like DK too. I have to prepare myself for the eventual nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:27 AM Response to Reply #20 |
36. Yes, Kerry is obviously part of the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:32 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Guilt trip #3: If Kerry loses in November, it is the base's fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:53 AM Response to Reply #43 |
58. "They will use this to push the party further right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zoeyfong
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:37 AM Response to Reply #58 |
94. Possibly, but that strategy has been tried and failed many times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSoundAndVision
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:14 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. and what a despicable thing to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:31 AM Response to Reply #22 |
41. Despicable because 2 wars are enough??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:16 AM Response to Reply #13 |
25. kerry gave w the permission to use my father in a fake war that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:39 AM Response to Reply #25 |
48. I am not asking you to dismiss it. I am saying that I don't want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:19 AM Response to Reply #13 |
26. How many Democrats voted for the war, or for PATRIOT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zoeyfong
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:39 AM Response to Reply #26 |
95. Right on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SWPAdem
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
23. Wow.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:24 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. And what happens after Bush is gone? Will Bush's policies be changed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. the front runner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:30 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. you mean Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:37 AM Response to Reply #38 |
46. here you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:44 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Kerry wrote money-laundering provisions of the Patriot Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:44 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:48 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. I oppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:56 AM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Let's keep things separate here, OK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:11 AM Response to Reply #54 |
72. Now about NCLB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:19 AM Response to Reply #72 |
76. if this law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 02:19 AM Response to Reply #76 |
84. Tell me something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SWPAdem
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:31 AM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Sorry, but I am firmly in the ABB camp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:37 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. We are discussing the Kerry Administration--ABB no longer applies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SWPAdem
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:46 AM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Why, pardon me sir, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:50 AM Response to Reply #52 |
57. good for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SWPAdem
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:54 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. If you will return the favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:57 AM Response to Reply #52 |
62. I am discussing the world after the election, assuming Kerry wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JaySherman
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:24 AM Response to Reply #62 |
77. On what facts do you base those assumptions? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SWPAdem
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:47 AM Response to Reply #62 |
82. Let's just call the election off, OK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
35. Deleted message |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:30 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. last I knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 03:20 AM Response to Reply #39 |
89. First, I call you on your straw man fallacy: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #89 |
103. Why are you willing to bet Kerry wouldn't start an unprovoked war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
37. you had your chance to impact the nominee, now shut up and vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:32 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. I did all those things and more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #42 |
53. so have and still do i, & you had better read my post again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:49 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. oh really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 12:58 AM Response to Reply #55 |
63. no, you didn't misinterpret anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 02:32 AM Response to Reply #37 |
85. Is that sarcasm when you state "just shut the fuck up" or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
66. I would like to see the third party talk moderated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:05 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Well frankly, it's not too friendly to third party voters either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:09 AM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Onwards to the Purge!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:12 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. is honest discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:28 AM Response to Reply #74 |
78. The Democrats are getting moderated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:38 AM Response to Reply #78 |
81. well genius |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zoeyfong
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:13 AM Response to Reply #78 |
97. Dems should win *respect* first; winning elections will follow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kanary
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:29 AM Response to Reply #66 |
79. Actually, it's not too friendly to anybody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zoeyfong
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:48 AM Response to Reply #66 |
96. No way. Censorship doesn't make the dem party stronger any more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:26 AM Response to Reply #66 |
99. When you don't like the message , censor it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JaySherman
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
73. Well now MrSoundAndVision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:35 AM Response to Reply #73 |
80. Nobody owes you or me or anybody else any "favors" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JaySherman
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 03:07 AM Response to Reply #80 |
88. The sad reality is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 03:21 AM Response to Reply #88 |
90. One-worded question: how? - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poskonig
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
75. Chief Justice Scalia will be making law for FORTY YEARS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:31 AM Response to Original message |
91. I was ready to ask other Democrats to support Dean in the general election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:49 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Ding ding ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BruinAlum
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
98. Voting third party IS a vote for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
102. a modest dissent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. voting that does not help remove Bush is voting that helps Bush - problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 11:14 AM Response to Reply #105 |
106. You mentioned logic. Of course there's a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. If logic says your guy is a protest vote with no chance, then it turns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV1962
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Congress *is* a parliament |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
104. I wonder how different the political landscape would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC