|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:51 PM Original message |
I'm shocked, shocked that it was a crap story from Drudge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Deleted message |
Dookus
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. to be fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseMen
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
37. The LOCKED threads were those that CRITICIZED the INFLAMATORY SLIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:53 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Nope... not all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Not to get off subject but are you a Gregory Isaacs fan too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thanks to Alexandra, Terry and Donna Polier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. I didn't do any tally of who believed it and who didn't.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Champion Jack
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I didn't keep a tally, but my ignore list swelled because of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsman Matt Drudge
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. Let me level with you Will, writer to writer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yo! Matt, you look funny, kinda like a Freeper born with an Ass face... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsman Matt Drudge
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. No, that's fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. **** WORLD EXCLUSIVE **** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. Indeed, Mr. Pitt: Who'd a' Thunk It? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BruinAlum
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. What scares me, is not so much that people fell for it, but that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Exactly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. YOu should see the comments on the Yahoo Boards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BruinAlum
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. You gotta be kidding me?? Are these Repubs?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
69. Self deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. yes, truly shocking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catholic Sensation
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. here's the thing will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
14. Are you going to be ok Will, I know how highly you regard Drudge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:15 PM Original message |
Alex Polier should freaking SUE Drudge and the Murdoch tabloids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
19. Risky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. It isn't just about this one story, or John Kerry's candidacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aldian159
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
70. by the time it gets to court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
23. I dont' think she can sue Drudge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Are you certain Drudge didn't use her name? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 11:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
75. I'm not sure if Drudge named her or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas_J
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
65. Not in Britain and Australia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInTheMaise
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. It does raise more questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catholic Sensation
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. questions with regard to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInTheMaise
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. No, questions like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catholic Sensation
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. here are the answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Be Serious, Fellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
71. The answers are clear to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eissa
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. The only thing that shocked me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I guess I'm the only one here who remembers the word *if* being used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. some didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Yeah, but most of the posts in this topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Stop ruining such a great opportunity for self-righteousness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #38 |
55. Bully for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. I neither need nor expect an apology from anybody... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
72. You are right again, my friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. No secretly crapping my pants here with one exception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eissa
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. No it wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:28 PM Response to Reply #30 |
47. Waidaminute - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. um...the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:48 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Oh. I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BruinAlum
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
52. No stains in my pants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
25. Off Topic- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
29. OUTSTANDING! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. Well Said, My Friend! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
49. What The Magistrate said. Good fer you. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
41. Watch out Will. It's not safe to defend Democratic candidates here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
44. Don't blame me. I hit the alert until my fingers were bleeding n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
46. Wow. 44 posts and not a single apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamond14
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:12 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. some watched and did NOTHING to stop it...they are equally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. Is it against DU rules to collect names of the posters and watch them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:23 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. Hello? Anyone seen a lone voice in the wilderness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 10:44 PM Response to Reply #46 |
74. In fairness there were plenty of 5 post Freeper Wonder Agitators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
48. This should be pinned to the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
50. The reason why I was taken by Drudge this time was.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:34 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Congratulations for being the first to admit error. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. DRUDGE BROKE SHIT.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
53. What's troubling is that the manufactured stench could linger in the air.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
legin
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
58. Whether the story is true or false is irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
legin
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:41 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. This is 'touchdown' Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
legin
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:02 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas_J
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
63. As I noted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
64. Except this time Rove's dirty trick has back fired. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
68. William Pitt- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 09:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. I will answer whatever you ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
76. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
77. I just ignored the story, on the reasonable assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DannyRed
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
78. sanctimonious smuggery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:38 AM Response to Reply #78 |
79. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC