|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:56 AM Original message |
Dean 2nd, Edwards 3rd -- Dean vs. Edwards in 2000 blue (Gore) states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drfemoe
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. DU Exclusive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
2. You're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Good analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. and that's the shame... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. You know...if it were anybody but Kerry maybe this wouldn't mean so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Exactly, dkf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anwen
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. If Dean's campaign is quixotic, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:11 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. go search my past posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anwen
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:54 PM Response to Reply #16 |
64. I don't have time for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anwen
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
63. deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I WANT an all out, fight to the end, kicking scratching eye gouge primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:03 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Yeah! I'm ready for this fight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. The money will go to very good use, Dookus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. yes it will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:15 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Whatever...we're going on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:23 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. oh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:27 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Dean supporters were talking to Kerry signholders and found out that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:38 AM Response to Reply #28 |
52. and I bet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:29 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. But you're wrong :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:48 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. You DO understand, don't you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:49 AM Response to Reply #35 |
61. I'm not talking about those that HAVE voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ficus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
62. Dean paid volunteers to come to Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:24 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. The folks who went from my area paid their own way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ficus
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 11:06 AM Response to Reply #70 |
74. I'm not saying that didn't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
34. And what do our taxes pay for Dookus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:50 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Not sure why you're asking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:00 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Just wondering if you think the money we "waste" when we pay taxes is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:19 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Still not getting your point.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:53 AM Response to Reply #41 |
56. WE are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
32. What problem? The problem of the media not being able to attack Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 07:08 AM Response to Reply #5 |
58. It's money that a Democrat would otherwise not see. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
65. Certainly not Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 08:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
59. "quixotic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exgeneral
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
67. since when is fighting against a sure loser nominee a problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. wow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:44 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That was Dookus, ladies and germs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. and don't forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
7. Ah, in just thinking back one year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:57 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Rebel Yell, Weirdo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:05 AM Response to Original message |
15. Amazing, Dean for second place! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:12 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Last man standing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:26 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. yes we'll see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:34 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Funny Guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:44 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. that's quite a plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:01 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Why does it take a scandal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:17 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:57 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Do you really believe that Dean doesn't have true disgust for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:01 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:11 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. not so fast there, gunner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:22 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:05 AM Response to Reply #39 |
48. Hmm... a strategy based on your opponent being a piece of shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:47 AM Response to Reply #48 |
60. Jeez, can't you understand TWO ideas at once? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Calm down - I understand that you were discussing two strategies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:17 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Yes, Dean for second place. Not Dean sucks and should drop out, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:03 AM Response to Reply #22 |
47. I won't object |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:15 AM Response to Original message |
21. Ridiculous argument; the RED STATES ARE THE ISSUE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tameszu
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:23 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Not to rain on your parade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:24 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Thanks for that post Tameszu. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:23 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Oh good grief, I don't want to fight with Edwards people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:36 AM Response to Reply #21 |
31. Are you planning on winning ANY of these states in 2004? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:27 AM Response to Reply #31 |
43. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 07:05 AM Response to Reply #43 |
57. Both, and then some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:38 AM Response to Reply #31 |
44. Okay, I'll bite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:30 AM Response to Reply #44 |
49. Your points, while generally subjective like many of mine, have merit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:34 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. still... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:35 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. CA & NY (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:41 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. ok... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:18 AM Response to Reply #21 |
54. well-put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
66. Red states where we Democrats have a prayer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:27 AM Response to Original message |
55. I think this misses the most important point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Casablanca
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
68. Apart from influencing primaries, second place is not out of the race ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Casablanca
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 01:48 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Didn't need Dean dropping out to see that happen. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
72. That would be the past... "Our time is now!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC