|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:34 PM Original message |
"If the election were held today" An electoral college map. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Don't believe this poll..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. Alaskans upset about ANWR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
36. What?? I don't think we've EVER carried Alaska. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. LBJ did in 1964 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 02:16 AM Response to Reply #38 |
56. I stand corrected... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. Since when are NM solid and Iowa leaning GOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yeah, we got Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. We won New Mexico too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ficus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. with Richardson as an asset there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
46. agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. Iowa, NM should be ours... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Check out this sentence in the analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I'm not sure about TN, but NH Leans Democratic surely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redneck Socialist
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I wouldn't go that far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. With Kerry on the ticket, NH leans Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redneck Socialist
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 01:47 AM Response to Reply #31 |
54. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
28. I mean, we have it now. For sure since we have been campaigning there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Recent Iowa Poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Iowa hasn't voted for a GOP president in years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Even Dukakis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ficus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. no question about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. I thought that was questionable, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. You read my mind and then posted it yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sagan
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. they think Ohio is going to "lean Bush"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. MO solid Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
39. Note that Ohio alone has enough electoral votes to tip the balance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. These maps are always wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. Their GOP leaners are all wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. I feel pretty confident Kerry can keep all his leaner states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. Sorry but that projection is BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. This looks like a projection from Ann Coulter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monument
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
11. Why are the red states BLUE and the blue states RED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ringmastery
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. It's not a flaw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. Missouri = Solid Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
14. This reminds me of those websites I'd run into in 2000...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aldian159
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. Win IL? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JasonDeter
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. If you read the fine print, it says, "Ya Ya thats the ticket." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Actually, 286 to 252 is not a landslide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rolling Titanic
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. All those states that everyone is saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowsdower
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
34. Edwards is the toughest opponent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I worry about him in NC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Edwards in N.C. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohc
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. It appears this analysis does not give Edward NC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. If this poll doesn't give Edwards NC outright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
49. I live in NC. Don't worry about him in NC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:25 PM Response to Reply #34 |
50. Yep, too bad the DNC doesn't seem to care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
40. I'd like to see more of the pollsters' data than this map shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. You can get lots of cool info in the exit polling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. You can get lots of cool info in the exit polling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:14 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Sounds interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. I found mine on MSNBC just as the polls closed in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
43. Now I see why Evan Bayh is getting the most attention as a running mate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Would Bayh be that much better than Gephardt or Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
51. This is meaningless without some description of the methodology used. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
53. After tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SerpentX
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
55. Bad analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 02:20 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. You are right major problems with this analysis... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SerpentX
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 02:32 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Clark has been my veep choice since before he through his hat in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC