|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Sensitivity
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:02 PM Original message |
Smear Works: Anyone Doubts That Drudge Smear Had Impact in WI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. I highly doubt the Drudge smear had ANY effect on the outcome in WI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I wouldn't be too sure that it had no effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark0rama
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Smear works by suppressing voter turnout... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. I think the Milwaukee and Madison newspapers had the effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:58 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. And Why. Those Endorsement were in middle of scandal story. Do you believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:21 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I wasn't there, so I don't know what they were saying privately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 12:17 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Is Wisconsin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 12:28 AM Response to Reply #38 |
56. How long doyou think it took for the media to contact the parents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Possible. And Wisconsin Is An OPEN PRIMARY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uconnyc
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. You don't think there are any Repubs that actually don't like * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. The Republicans had an effect on the outcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Only 10% of the electorate in this primary were Repubs...40% Indies, tho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mot78
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
eileen_d
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. And we have seen plenty of evidence to prove otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rasmodia
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. That's not what he said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Matt Drudge is a hack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. And Drudge no doubt got it from Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xray s
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. he lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirochete
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. an unnamed Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. "He said he got it from a Democrat." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. And you accept the word of a known liar because? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rasmodia
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. It makes perfect sense that Kerry would have it put out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:36 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I've had my fill of unsubstantiated, unverifiable slime and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. It's well known in Washington that Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Funny,I live in the Boston area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masshole
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. nor have I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rasmodia
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. You have to be involved in political circles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masshole
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. ok, I'll be your Huckleberry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rasmodia
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:07 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Certainly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masshole
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. some help here please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rasmodia
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Apparently not...if your friend is in the dark on this non-secret. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. GW Bush is the worst President in history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. I'm glad you said that because I am involved in political circles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. According to Randi Rhodes, it originall came from Lucianne Goldberg. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DjTj
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
13. The Drudge report came out last week and Edwards had no traction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 12:54 AM Response to Reply #13 |
48. Mo Rocco had to say it. Made joke about probable impact of smear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
14. No. I think the only ones inclined to believe that tripe were people who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Edwards did so well because of Edwards. Not because of Drudge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'd like to see a POLL of awareness of the "issue" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adamrsilva
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think it had more to do with all the Repubs and Indies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. But why were 70% of indis and repub want Edwards not Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. we don't know till someone asks them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
29. I disagree somewhat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
32. I think the debate had more effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tobius
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. Have to agree, forgot the obvious. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BGrier
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
37. MSNBC Reports Heavy Republican Turnout For Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shanty Oilish
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
46. The Clark endorsement of Kerry helped Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
49. I think Edwards's NAFTA opposition propelled him to almost a win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 01:20 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Satisfied w Bush, Conservative, Supported the War, Non-Union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseMen
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
51. Smear would not have been caried out if it was not sure to work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
52. A large percentage of voters made up their minds within the last 3 days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseMen
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 08:43 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Rassmusen survey suggests that there was significant impact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeaconBlues
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
54. Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
55. Having done WI politics--it cost Kerry 6-8. WI is a coservative state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
57. Susan Estrich said the smear had impact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseMen
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
58. Word is there is more slime being spread on the net. Edwards in luck with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
59. The only people I know who knew about this were libertarians and righties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:28 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. If you knew the rumor and were conservative, why would you risk embarasing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC