Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama a no-show on the Biden/Boxer/Brownback/Kerry amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:20 PM
Original message
Obama a no-show on the Biden/Boxer/Brownback/Kerry amendment
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 12:21 PM by Lirwin2
Please start rationalizing.... now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. This should be good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. No rationalizing--if he missed crucial votes, then he gets a thump on the head from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. 2 in a row
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. i remember when Gephardt was running, he missed a crucial vote in the house on block grants
for head start and i was pissed because his vote would have made the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. So you want to deflect by going after history?
How original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. um what? do you know who i support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. um what? Did I say you supported anyone?
I made a statement of fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. i really have no idea what you're talking about, i pointed out a fact
you have a problem with facts? How is pointing out a fact about how missed votes can really screw things up is an attempt to deflect criticism away from Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
104. How did that work out for Gephardt?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rationalize Clinton's AYE vote first...
:popcorn:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Okay, at least she took a stand and showed everyone what a
corporate loving repubic ass she is.

Obama hasn't got the guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'll cast judgment when I see a statement...
It beats jumping the shark.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Just like last time. There's that 3 hour period when you haven't been told what to think yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
107. very shrewd , grasshopper
Pre-appointed appearances across the country. I don't think I would have flown back for another bullshit vote either.

What's Hillary's excuse for voting YES?

Oh Right.
HILLARY IS STILL AND ALWAYS WILL BE A PANDERING HAWK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Shields up! DEFLECT!! DEFLECT! DEFLECT!
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 12:34 PM by William769
We cannot allow any criticism of Obama, change the subject. Shields up! DEFLECT!! DEFLECT! DEFLECT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. YES CAPTAIN!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
95. "I'm givin' it all she's got, cap'n!!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. By the way, this is the BIDEN amendment, not the LIEBERMAN one (which Obama ALSO didn't vote on)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. And Clinton happily voted AYE on!!! What is wrong with her!
A no show is better than an Aye from someone who claims to be a Dem. Oh wait, I forgot, the DLC wants war with everyone so we can keep the corporations in business.

I don't like Obama either, but Clinton...WTF???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Define "Dem"
76 people voted YEA. That means more dems voted YEA than NAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. and 77 people voted for the Iraq War Resolution
that doesn't make them right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. That doesn't make Hillary "not a dem"
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 12:54 PM by Lirwin2
I think refusing to vote on every controversial bill you ever come across, shouldn't even make you a member of congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. People voted for a "Dem" Congress in '06 to end this fracking war
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 12:58 PM by AllyCat
It would be nice if they actually tried donning that hat and voting against every little controversial bill that continues this cluster that's killing our people and theirs in Iraq for no reason. Hillary is pro-Iraq and now pro-Iran war. She has no intention of ending it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Only loyal "dems" like Obama can end it!!
By "voting" nay.. I mean yay... I mean... um.. err... how did he vote again? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Again. I don't like Obama either.
He's a no show and HRC took it one step further voting yes. They have both shown they want this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
59. "I don't know"???
"Maybe"? "Can't decide, so I'll abstain"? "I didn't read the amendment, so I have no opinion"? Geez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. That's hard to do anymore. What with the DLC and BlueDogs
voting like Repugs most of the time. Dems used to represent the people. Not anymore. One has to look at each person and see if they represent themselves and corporate interests or the constituents who voted for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Hillary voted yes on the Lieberman amendment as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. How did obama vote on that one?
He voted NAY, I presume?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. i'm not here to talk about him
because i'm not a foaming obama supporter - i don't have a hat in this race yet

but how can anyone justify voting yes on this amendment - that's what i want to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. So you didn't come to a topic about Obama to talk about Obama?
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. no, i am asking why are people being hypocritical on this
Obama didn't vote, who knows why. If he was there and didn't he's a coward, if he wasn't there then I don't know.

It is selective hearing and intellectual dishonesty to point out what one person didn't do without acknowledging that a candidate that you are supporting just voted in favor of an amendment that basically gives the green light to a war with Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Maybe not a "foaming obama supporter", but definitely foaming. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. He is a condom candidate
He practices safe politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Wouldn't you have to at least do something to need a condom?
He's too god damn phony and gutless.

This is exactly what I expect from Barrie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You are right
You would need to at least get up.... off your butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. He's the abstinence only candidate!
He abstains from voting completely in order to keep his prospects safe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That's better than mine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Good one!!!!
I'm sure he'll have a "statement" any time now.

This was a very important amendment and to miss the vote is inexcusable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
79. You know something about condoms
Without may be riskier, but its so much more meaningful, same with politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. He bagged on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment too...
My understanding is that he is in town...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I swear I heard his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I did too!
So we're either both delusional or we are both perceptive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murbley40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
74. I heard his name .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmccaskill Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. hey
obama is screwed, damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Obama did not vote: Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thanks for that!
Where is he??? Preparing for tonites debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
60. Only two senators didn't vote
McCain and Obama! Evidently the rest of the senate knew this was an important session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. No. He didn't bother to show for this one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I heard the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. and Hillary voted yes on it...so, who are her supporters to criticize?
she supports war with Iran, justify that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Oh so I geuss Obama's NAY vote means he doesn't support war with Iran?
He did vote NAY after all, didnt he? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
82. Yes he did
But then again HRC voted FOR it, so I'm not entirely sure who is worse, not standing up to the enemy or siding with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. Just because you trash Obama every chance you get --
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 01:14 PM by AtomicKitten
doesn't mean people are required to respond to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. How is this "trashing" Obama?
Please explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Asking why he didn't vote - is not trashing him.
Where was he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
48. I'll take a "Not Voting" over voting FOR attacking Iran anyday
You can cherish her lovely vote to want to go into another war if you want. Have at it...

:crazy:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. it's a desperate act of subterfuge
OP: "Hey, pay no attention to my candidate's "yes" vote on this POS bill. Look at that guy: OMFG he didn't vote and everybody knows a no-show is way worse than a "yes" vote. Oh, the faux outrage!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. Not only do we have defection we have a un truth.
I wonder what else we could call a un truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
68. Wait a minute, was attacking Iran in any part of the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #68
97. It was saber-rattling Iran and calling for the use of military force in Iran
OK. It's already illegally happening anyway.

"Our military leaders, diplomats, and intelligence reports say that there is clear evidence Iran is exerting negative influence in Iraq," said Kyl. "I believe that the Senate's adoption of this measure sends a message to Iran that the U.S. will not tolerate any interference to progress in Iraq. It is now incumbent upon the State Department to add the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to the list of terrorist organizations."

http://lieberman.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=284225

Senator Webb said:

"Those who regret their vote five years ago to authorize military action in Iraq should think hard before supporting this approach. Because, in my view, it has the same potential to do harm where many are seeking to do good.

At best, it’s a deliberate attempt to divert attention from a failed diplomatic policy,” said Webb. “At worst, it could be read as a backdoor method of gaining Congressional validation for military action, without one hearing and without serious debate."

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/25/webb-kyl-lieb-iran/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
50. What is the amendment about? I have no idea. I should but I missed this
one. What is the Biden amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmccaskill Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. hey
maybe it's a strategy, Hillary's been getting all the attention, so him not voting, they will bring it up in the debate then they will all go after him tonight then he can fight them all off and win then he can prove his medal , get media attention, and get some votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Think82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #50
80. www.planforiraq.com
pushing for federalizing Iraq into sunni, shia, kurd states under a weak central gov. MUCH MORE details at the link above. It's Biden's iraq plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #80
101. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
54. Running for President requies you to miss votes, end of story
I say the same thing when Hillary misses votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Missing votes on whether we step it up in Iran?
Running for President means you know how to prioritize your schedule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Pretty sure this is non-binding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. There were important amendments on the floor today
and unless a senator was in the hospital, his/her job was to BE THERE and cast a vote. If a candidate can't effectively prioritize their choices in the race, what kind of president would that person be? We already have a president who puts politics and vacations ahead of national interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #58
87. Sorry, this is the same bullshit that the Republicans attacked Kerry for in 2004
I didn't buy it then and I don't buy it now.

When you're President everybody adjusts their schedule around you and you can travel with incredible efficiency making use of Air Force One and the presidential motorcade. Senators don't have those luxuries and neither do Presidential candidates unless they are the incumbent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
57. When was the vote scheduled and was the schedule changed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Yesterday it was determined that it would be voted on
today in the morning. All but two senators were there and voted. McCain and Obama were no-shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
62. Barack Obama: Boldly not standing against you!
Boldly not standing for you!

Boldly standing as far as he can get from anything controversial!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmccaskill Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
63. o-bomb
i think he will get killed tonight, lets say goodbye to the obama presidency, he might even want a way out by not voting, if this is some weird strategy to win i have no idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
64. I think I understand why he didn't vote.
If I understand the amendment correctly, it calls for dividing Iraq up into three regions -- something that is not up to us.

This whole mess in Iraq started decades ago when foreign powers from outside the region created artificial borders and imposed their idea of how the region should be governed.

Obama is abstaining (I think) because he knows that the Iraqi people are the ones who should be making these decisions -- not the United States Congress or any other foreign power.

At least http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/25/125711/818">_one other_ agrees with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Wrong - the bill said exactly that - It is up to the Iraqis.
try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Any idea on the Production Sharing Agreements (PSA)?
Do you know what that is? How will it be implemented and by whom?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. It was suppose to be divided up between the regions - but with Hunt oil
having their hands in it now - who knows?

Biden's amendment calls for sharing between the regions.

This is something that hopefully the Iraqi's can figure out - or the UN - not the oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. Then I'll wait.
Someone on Obama's _site_ has already asked the question and I'm sure an answer will be forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
93. That's not true - listen to part of Kerry's speech
at this link - starting 13 minutes in. Kerry had always said that we should not draw the lines that the Iraqis had to do it. This Biden proposal gives the reponsibility of drawing lines and defining how the states and teh weak federal government interact. Obama should say if would have voted yes or no or intentially abstained.

The SECOND video has Kerry's comment - and of course they are good :), the answer to your points is about 13 minutes in. (To me this sounds like a cross between Biden's idea and Kerry's repeated since 2004 summit. (Kerry also puts a plug in for the deadline - explaining that otherwise no one is motivated to do anything.

http://kerryvision.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
66. was the vote close?
I believe half the Senate Democrats, or more, voted for it.

so, it wasn't like his no-vote cost them anything.

not voting is better than voting the wrong way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. 75 - 23
49 dems voted for it - one was missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #66
78. But it is hardly presidential
All the senators except TWO thought it was important enough to vote. Being decisive and taking a position is important for anyone seeking the office of President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. well
has Obama released a statement on the matter yet?

let's see what he has to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. I want to believe there is a really good explanation
and will give him the benefit of the doubt if he responds in a timely fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
72. Maybe he had an important meeting with the president of Canada
....or Master P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Think82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
73. BIDEN THE UNITER
Please get behind this man for president. He's what this country needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
75. I'm sick of Obama nad Hillary
She's not on our side and he's afraid to take a stand
EDWARDS ALL THE WAY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Think82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. why not
Biden? Because the media selects wich three front-runners are eligible. Biden's amendment is INCREDIBLY important and achieved bi-partisan support. No one was for it two years ago, and now it PASSED. That's a fuckin' leader.

BIDEN 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murbley40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #77
90. Biden accomplished with this ammendment
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 03:15 PM by murbley40
what no one has been able to accomplish for a very long time. A majority of the Senate agreeing on
something and voting together on it. This my friends, is LEADERSHIP. It is not an example of leadership to not show up for something as important as this . Beyond the Iraq issue it was about coming together. Joe Biden can bring our country together and help us get our respect back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
76. Sure, the votes were supposed to take place yesterday and
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 02:42 PM by Mass
Obama had a rally planned this morning in NH, after he had a rally in Maine yesterday evening.

Given that none of these votes were remotely close, I wont blame him too much for not showing up (I'd like to know how he would have voted though).

However, I am still waiting explanations about Hillary's vote on Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. Me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murbley40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
85. Let's make sure that everyone understands:
The Lieberman/kyle bill contained language that allows for going after Iran. The Biden/Boxer amendment concerned Iraq. Hillary voted yes on both. Obama did not show up for either.
Biden/Boxer passed 75-23 49 of those yes votes were democrats. Obama is the only democrat who did not show up to vote. Is he ill?:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
86. This vote was NO SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE
You want to blame someone, blame that DINO harry reid...

"Obama is in New Hampshire trying to become our next President. Majority Leader Reid said last night that there would be no vote on this amendment in the near future, so Senator Obama had no reason to expect that this vote would be happening today. The announcement that the amendment would come up for a vote today didn't happen until 12:30pm. What was Senator Obama supposed to do, hop on a private jet and fly straight back to the Capitol? It's not like his vote would've changed the outcome."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3551091

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Think82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. Biden, Dodd, HRC
are also running for president. They were there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #86
98. Not taking aby sides here, but
what Reid said yesterday afternoon meant that they were not able to reach an agreement, and that the amendments (both Biden's and Kyl's) will not be voted on yesterday nor early today. It definitely di dnot mean that they will not be voted on today, and I am sure that was obviously clear to any senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klaxon Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
89. Ring Ring... Ring Ring...
<Pot ..Hello this is Kettle calling!>

<Kettle... you low down no good bastard!!>

<No pot... you are the low down no good bastard!!>

<What ever Kettle.... YOU are the low down no good bastard>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>

<NO! YOU ARE!>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
91. So pretty much ANYTHING they say now is going to be considered rationalizing?
Nice way to have a debate.

If I was an Obama supporter, I'd abstain from this thread as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #91
96. I'm sure he would approve!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. Thank God I don't have a dog in this hunt yet
And what you're doing isn't helping me to warm up to Hillary, just so you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. Yea well, I'm not too worried about "offending" people into not voting for Hillary
She can manage just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
92. Could you provide a link to Thomas.gov
so I can read the bill and see who voted for it. Much obliged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmccaskill Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
94.  obama
Chris Matthews of hardball just reported Obama came down with the stomach flu, but he will try to make the debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
102. how about he saw Hillary and had to go puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #102
106. Where are you posting from, the second grade?
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 09:35 PM by NoPasaran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratsin08 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
103. i think he is too cowardly
to go on the record with a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
105. Does anyone have a link to the vote?
I've been looking on Thomas, and I can't find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murbley40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
108. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC