Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Front-runner is a status vulnerable to change. (NY Times Article yesterday)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:58 PM
Original message
Front-runner is a status vulnerable to change. (NY Times Article yesterday)
Out in front, Clinton still faces formidable opponents

NEWS ANALYSIS
By Adam Nagourney

WASHINGTON, Sept. 25 -- - Anyone wanting to understand why Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign is being praised these days in many quarters — including rival campaigns and the White House — needed to look no further than their televisions on Sunday morning. Mrs. Clinton appeared on five interview programs, the campaign equivalent of a home run.

Mrs. Clinton appeared from her home and for the most part on her terms, primarily to talk about health care, wringing another day of what has been mostly positive coverage from the plan she announced Sept. 17.

Mrs. Clinton’s proposal came long after the ones put forward by former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, and Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, and it was very much derivative of them. No matter; by the end of the week, her plan was, at least for the moment, defining the discussion — serving as a reminder that the Democratic presidential contest these days is to a considerable degree being defined by and around Mrs. Clinton.

Politicians and journalists inevitably try to simplify crowded political contests by identifying one candidate as a front-runner, long before a single American even votes. It is a designation that is often based on the most tenuous of evidence and one that often proves to be wrong.

snip

More... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20982557/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what I'm counting on.
I REALLY don't want to be stuck with her. She's WAY too centrist and beholden to corporate interests for me.
And I think her health plan blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's my hope as well, which is why I DEVOUR pieces like this! Good luck
to both our candidates!

PS -- I'm in NC, too if that's what the NC means. Biden (my guy) said "give us more Democrats" so they're not shot down every time on the floor, and I vowed to get involved in the local level. I just vowed that this morning, so I haven't accomplished anything yet. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. NO MORE DOLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I saw her speak the other day and she looked as though she'd walked off the
set of Dynasty. Maybe she's not really alive and her embalmed remains are being manipulated. It was really spooky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I have yet to volunteer this year...
But yes, Burr and Dole are AWFUL.

I may yet go volunteer for the Edwards campaign, but I don't know when I'd be able to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. True, but Hillary's lead is a lot bigger than the typical frontrunner
Still, Hillary's so-called inevitability is perhaps the only thing that could be her undoing. For her sake, I hope that her advisers aren't already assuming they have it locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hillary has been leading since 2003, too
People like to claim that Dean was in the lead around this time 2003 in order to prove that things can change very quickly. However, if you look at polls around that time, if Hillary was included on the list, she beat dean by almost 3 to 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yea, but the front-runner vulnerability goes back way before Dean
Early favorites and front-runners have tended to collapse in Democratic Primaries, except for incumbent Presidents and Vice Presidents, going back to when McGovern upset Ed Muskie.

Republicans, on the other hand, almost always try to anoint a candidate as early as possible and take down all meaningful opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep.
2004 Howard Dean
2000 Al Gore
1992 Mario Cuomo
1988 Gary Hart
1984 Walter Mondale
1976 Henry Jackson
1972 Edmund Muskie
1968 Eugene McCarthy

Only two of those front-runners ever went on to win the nomination, and both lost in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well to be fair, Mario Cuomo might have won if he'd actually run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. That doesn't show me anything positive.
It shows me it's mostly name recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Her advisors are too smart to start feeling confident. Someone posted an
e-mail her campaign sent out where she was asking for contributions by a certain date which would translate to the media that she has even more more money and support. So they're not resting on their laurels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Guess there is another scandal about her fund raising today.
It is getting to be as bad as Bsh - a new scandal everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC