Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Encouraged by Women's Response, Clinton Stresses Female Side

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:32 PM
Original message
Encouraged by Women's Response, Clinton Stresses Female Side
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/13/AR2007101301274.html?hpid=topnews

In the latest Washington Post-ABC News survey, conducted in late September, 57 percent of women said they would support Clinton in a Democratic primary, compared with 15 percent for Sen. Barack Obama and 13 percent for former senator John Edwards. Of those who support Clinton, 31 percent said that her chance to make history was a factor in their decision.

At the same time, in a theoretical general election test against Republican front-runner Rudolph W. Giuliani, Clinton has a lead that is almost entirely attributable to women. She also has a gaping lead among self-described feminists, according to the same poll. Men and women who call themselves feminists preferred Clinton 64 to 30 percent, while those who did not were evenly divided between Clinton and Giuliani, 48 to 46 percent.

The flip side of her strong support from women is the potential for a backlash among men -- especially in a state such as Iowa, the first caucus state, which has never elected a woman to Congress. Mark Penn, her chief strategist, said the "level of emotional attachment" between female voters and Clinton is strong enough to help carry her through the Iowa caucuses, which he said he expected to be 55 to 60 percent women. Fifty-four percent of Democratic caucusgoers in 2004 were women.

"It may be true that statewide they haven't elected a woman, but that's very different from a Democratic primary or caucus," Penn said. He also pointed out that Clinton is faring better among men in recent surveys than she did earlier this year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. More crap from the WaPo and ABC
This is the same MSM that sold the public the bullshit about Iraq having WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. She'll Deck 'Em... In A Maternal Way
Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who are these women
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 10:56 PM by Blue_In_AK
who support a candidate based solely on her gender? I would hope that the women of this country would be smarter than that. Vote for Hillary if you like her policies and positions, but not because she's a woman. That's just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. men keep getting us into stupid wars because they want to prove how manly
they are, they have to act out their military and cowboy fantasies. Yeah, I would like to vote for a woman just because she is a woman and will have a cooler head about some of these things. But then we get a female running and she always has to prove how she will not be womanly, she will be just as tough as the men. Yes, that is probably why Hillary voted as she did and why she will not say it was a mistake. And do not start in on how women will go berserk once a month!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm a woman myself
so you won't hear any of that PMS stuff come out of MY mouth. All I'm trying to say about Hillary (or any candidate) is that, in my opinion, people should or should not vote for her based on her POLICIES and PRINCIPLES, not on her gender. And if Sen. Clinton is deliberately trying to act "manly" because she thinks she'll win that way, it kind of turns me, as a woman, off. I would vote for a peace-loving man over a war-condoning woman any day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. By the time women have enough status to run for the presidency
They're already in menopause!

No PMS crap to worry about, there! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I don't know, I think there is something to that.
As I posted during the summer: http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Sparkly/58

I think there's powerful symbolism in having Clinton or Obama in office. It says something to the world, and to our citizens; it definitely provides a role-model for children that we haven't had before. It shatters preconceptions about what's possible.

I agree that it might not be a factor for everyone, or it might be only a small factor for some and a larger one for others, but it's there and I don't have a problem with some people valuing it highly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Her "female SIDE?"
Funny term. Made me think of something like this:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. So "Encouraged by Men's Response, Clinton Stresses Male Side"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. awesome; more poLLs
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Strike a blow for women's rights!
Blindly vote for whomever looks the most female!



Aren't identity politics grand? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC