Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama rejects Triangulation Politics.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:21 PM
Original message
Obama rejects Triangulation Politics.
MADISON, Wis. – Barack Obama said Monday the nation has had enough of “triangulation and poll-driven politics,” a reference to the presidency of Bill Clinton, the husband of his chief Democratic rival.

Addressing a convention center rally dominated by students, Obama said that he had spoken out against going to war in Iraq in 2002, even as advisers told him it would be a mistake to challenge a popular president, George W. Bush.


Advertisement
Then an Illinois state lawmaker, Obama said he did so because he did not want to “enter the United States Senate already having compromised on core principles.”

“We've had enough of ... triangulation and poll-driven politics,” he said. “That's not what we need right now.”

Obama never mentioned Hillary Rodham Clinton by name. His reference to triangulation, however, refers to Bill Clinton's eight years as president when some advisers urged him to make policy decisions by splitting the difference on opposing views. The practice became known as “triangulation.”

The remark drew a swift response from the Clinton campaign.

“Senator Obama spent the last week abandoning the politics of hope and attacking Senator Clinton. Looks like he's begun this week by attacking her husband,” said campaign spokesman Mo Elleithee. “The fact is that most Americans believe that Bill Clinton was a good president who moved the country forward.”

Obama, who entered the U.S. Senate in January 2005, promised his young supporters on Monday that he was the presidential candidate who could bring the most change to politics. He said he could reform health care, end the Iraq war and ease the nation's dependence on foreign oil.

“I am confident in my ability to lead the country in this new direction,” Obama said.

He addressed around 4,000 people at a rally, many of them students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Students paid $15 for tickets to the fundraiser while adults paid $30.

Wisconsin, which holds its primary relatively late in the process on Feb. 19, hasn't received much attention from the presidential candidates. Republican Rudy Giuliani is to arrive in Milwaukee on Thursday for a fundraiser.


http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20071015-1414-obama-clinton.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lame -
That will really have a big impact on his campaign since 95% of the population does not have a clue what the word means.

If pressed they would say it is that small funny shaped pipe they played with in elementary school along with the sand paper blocks and finger cymbals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. LOL! I have to agree.
They *may* get the "poll driven politics" bit but "triangulation"? No way. Dumb it down, Barack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. There've been more than a few
people I've talked to over the years in the Co-op who know exactly what "triangualtion" is in reference to. Not everybody is totally outta the loop on Bill Clinton's policies.

Good for Obama saying that cause I'm wondering what good it did Clinton and our country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama: "I won't listen to what the American people want. I won't find a way to make it work."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because the public demanded the V-chip and school uniforms. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, and balanced budgets and middle class tax cuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And the Iraq war. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. bush* is triangulating?
In which universe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, but Hillary voted for the Iraq war.
Even though her constituents didn't want a war.

Then again, New York was never anything but a stepping stone for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Then you don't what triagulation is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Sure, she voted for the war and then made some
bullcrap statement about how she wasn't voting for war.

As SNL paraphrased her: "My constituents know that my support for the war was always insincere. If I had known that a person could get elected president without supporting the war, of course I would have voted against it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Keep giving * a pass on the Iraq Invasion
Rove appeciates it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Bush gets no pass, but neither do his enablers. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. word
It's like dealing with a 2-year-old that points to an imaginary friend to blame. If Democrats can't take stock of their complicity in this nightmare honestly and critically, we have no hope of change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You prefer followers over leaders. No surprise.
In lieu of banners, your candidate hands out these at rallies ---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Leaders usually do prefer followers
Guess who prefers leaders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Are you serious?
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 06:43 PM by jefferson_dem
I would love to see a principled leader...a fighter in the Oval Office.

...One who has the credibility and competence to spearhead a positive progressive agenda for our Nation.

And we all know who that isn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Of course I am
Why dont you point out where I was wrong?

If you want a leader to follow, that's fine with me. Suit yourself. But please don't try to dismiss me without even giving me the courtesy of explaining where you think I was wrong.

And around here "we all" are wondering who you're talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. I elaborated on why I think leadership is important.
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 06:52 PM by jefferson_dem
I was not being dismissive. Sorry if you took it that way.

Think about the great presidents in our nation's history. In my view, the word "leader" applies to them all...

and I wouldn't call those who benefited from their leadership "followers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I didn't say leadership is unimportant
I implied that leadership is for followers.

I thought you were being dismissive because of the "Are you serious?" with no explanation for it. It came across as "What are you nuts?". But I accept your explanation. Im sure you didnt mean it that way.

And as far as those great presidents go, I bet you'd be hard-pressed to demonstrate their leadership before they became president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I appreciate your point.
and am always wary of the "sheeple" tag.

By the way, a belated welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Thanks for the welcome
and I don't like the sheeple tag either. It's arrogant.

Not that I'm not arrogant.. I'm just not that arrogant

It's hard to demonstrate leadership in the Senate. Look at Kerry. A fine man, but it's hard to find leadership in his senate career. Btw, I love Kerry, and he did show leadership in the Senate on BCCI, Iran/Contra, and the S&L scandal, but how many people outside of DU know about that?

And I do believe that HRC has shown some leadership, both in and out of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
48. Kucinich! No wait he said there was no evidence and voted no...
never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. psst! A leader does what her/his people tell her/him to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. That's not a leader. That's a tool.
In my world, a leader does what's right, and persuades others along the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. No, that's a leader. Presidents work for us, not vice versa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hallelujah!!
Triangulating is nothing short of dishonest manipulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. This won't work either
Wonder what plan C is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. We need to hear more about merit pay for teachers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Well, Obama is trying to distinguish himself from Clinton
Merit pay would be a start. After that, we could move to tort reform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Are you suggesting
he is going to take over Edwards positions? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Edwards lights go off in March.. I hope someone can turn them on before Nov 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Tort and Port reform...Dubai is still in the cards, they say..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. of course the bots want us to keep living with corruption and triangulation and imperial presidency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. The passing of the baton is already in progress ....
We don't need no stinkin' elections!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Why did Obama oppose an amendment to the BK Act that would have capped credit card interest at 30%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes, Bill was good. It moved us to outsourcing and people who were laid off at Maytag
Motorola really love the NAFTA policy he implement. They are really doing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Why did Obama call the respected Paul Wellstone a "gadfly'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. For me, "politics of hope" doesn't mean a candidate who talks about
nothing but pretty ponies and cute little bunnies. Among other things, it includes a candidate who stands on principle regardless of the latest poll!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Does Standing On Principle Mean Missing Controversial Votes?
Like the Petraeus-Move On Vote, the Kyl-Lieberman Vote, and scores of votes on abortion when he was an Illionois state legislator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Sure beats casting the wrong vote, eh?
like, um, well you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Not According To Dante Alighieri
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great moral crises maintain their neutrality”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. riiiiiiight
Hillary's propensity for war is the kind of "rising to a moral crisis" this country can do without.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. What? A wrong vote?
you mean like Obama voting for the appointment of the war criminal Condaleeza Rice for Secretary of State?

Uh- obama must be confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. if you say so
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 07:53 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. GOOD! I am so SICK of her triangulating!
Not to mention saying a president shouldn't always say what they think. Now anything he says will be called "abandoning the politics of hope"? That's not gonna fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. I much prefer Obama's Triangulation...He's a Natural...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. The 'politics of hope" is about changing the way business is done in Washington, putting the public
interest before the special interests--change from the bottom up, not from the top down!

Mo, is Rove writng these inane reponses from the Clinton camp? Sure sounds like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. I Thought The Politics Of Hope Was Missing Important Votes And Hoping Nobody Notices
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. "My dog ate my memo"
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. K & R That needed to be said.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
50. Hit 'em hard, Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC