|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 07:58 PM Original message |
Poll question: Agree or Disagree with the Following Statement: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Funny...20 years ago people were fearing the amount of holdings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. For the most part, I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 05:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
72. I agree it's true about our ruling class, but they're not "our society" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. I really want to disagree but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Wow, I agree, and I too have tapered my visits to WRH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. It was a matter of protecting my mental health |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. I disagree as stated--it's a deeply-rooted char. of the ruling class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Yes, that is why I only agree for the most part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuctapeFatwa
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. That's the way it is, and the way it will be until people, either in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JasonDeter
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. We are suffering terrorist attacks today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Iraq sanctions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JasonDeter
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. We now know that under Clinton Iraq was disarmed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. He could have held back US aid to them, perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 10:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. Actually, Carter started the US on the road to funding the mujahedeen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JasonDeter
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 06:22 AM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Please! Kind of a stretch? I'd rather say it was Carter who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:56 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. The truth about that war is a lot uglier than met the eye. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 07:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
64. It Was Properly Done, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SerpentX
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:33 AM Response to Reply #6 |
39. "What foreign policy did Carter have that brought trouble to us?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JasonDeter
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 06:32 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. So we should have just let him fall into the hands of the bloodthirsty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SerpentX
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 07:09 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. He should have been made to account for his crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
85. Damn those people for not wanting a CIA imposed dictator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burma Jones
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. US Imperialism is based on money and exercised through... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcos
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. as a foreigner: Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. RichM is right, whether you want to admit it to yourself or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 10:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. Adding to your Freidman quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amber dog democrat
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. Ever since the Spanish American War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbm
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
14. I sort of agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fargin Ice Hole
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. The three deeply rooted charateristics are............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. It seems obvious to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JitterbugPerfume
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I kind of agree but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
21. Thank you for making me famous! I wrote the quoted remark - and defy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcos
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 09:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Excellent post! I totally agree n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 09:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Wow - excellent post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 11:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. No, I don't really consider WWII to be in that category. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 11:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. That Is Reasonably Sound, Mr. M |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
86. We were once expansionists,but the Cold War gave us a real taste of empire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 11:17 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Completely agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BourgeoisPig
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:45 AM Response to Reply #21 |
36. Great post - I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
23. HEY JohnLocke -- if you "vehemently disagree," please tell us why. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 10:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Way to expound on your clearly well thought out and thoroughly researched |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
54. Bullshit. You asked a question, and I answered. Don't expect a treatise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Deleted message |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. By the way, nice abusive kicking back there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Better example of abusive thread kicking here. Link, for your pleasure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:59 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. I fail to see your point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 07:02 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. JohnL - you didn't "write a treatise" because you don't know enough to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Self-delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 10:22 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Please try to make the whole argument. I'd expect to see a thoughtful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:45 AM Response to Reply #29 |
43. Still waiting for your thoughtful reply, JohnLocke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:59 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Still waiting... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:40 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Still waiting... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:32 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Still waiting... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 10:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
66. Still waiting... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 09:23 PM Response to Reply #66 |
76. Still waiting... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrokenSegue
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 09:43 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. He won't respond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Wed Feb-25-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. That's obvious, but I'll kick it again anyway, & give him every chance to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. He's around (just posted another poll) so here's one more kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BourgeoisPig
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:46 AM Response to Reply #27 |
37. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
56. Could your Green party sig graphic take up any more bandwidth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 08:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. Congratulations! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrokenSegue
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 09:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
80. Look at yours, with all those pictures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 10:10 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Clearly the candidate of gluttony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
25. Exactly correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Thu Feb-19-04 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
26. My Only Caveat, Mr. Locke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 12:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
45. Obviously, the Soviet Union after '79 displayed imperialist ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #45 |
63. Not So, My Friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
35. Kick. This actually turned into a good thread, in spite of the post that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonk
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:12 AM Response to Reply #35 |
48. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
38. Other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhereIsMyFreedom
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
49. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ngGale
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:36 AM Response to Original message |
50. Bush is the most Imperialist president since Nixon, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kenneth ken
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:41 AM Response to Original message |
51. I voted yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzsammich
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 03:35 AM Response to Reply #51 |
68. so before that turning point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:42 AM Response to Original message |
52. It's the characteristic of STATES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
60. Would This Be True If Dean Were President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
67. Its a question of degree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 03:37 AM Response to Original message |
69. I disagree, the US was relatively isolationist until ww2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzsammich
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 05:15 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. perhaps in rhetoric... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 06:08 PM Response to Reply #69 |
84. Tell that to Mexico, Canada, Panama, Cuba, Phillipenes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 05:34 AM Response to Original message |
71. I agree with it. Though I'm sure that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
73. Of course it's true, and history proves it so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
morgan2
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
74. i agree with everything except |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
75. The statement is too fatalistic--"Always will"--but is bascially true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 09:39 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Please note that the statement was taken out of context by JohnLocke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shoopnyc123
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
78. Three Words: READ THE CONSTITUTION (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MAlibdem
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
87. I disagree with the premise of the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC