|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:33 AM Original message |
What if the reason the Clintons want their papers sealed is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. That's Won't Stop The Bashers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. It shouldn't stop the bashers, as long as Sen. Clinton runs on "experience" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. She Will Be Fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Jim4Wes - please make that post its own thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. ok. when I have some time to respond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Thanks for the info ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
44. Which of course is why Russert and his ilk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. You are making implications and innuendos, same as pig face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Are the papers sealed? Why? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. It's in the first response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. President Clinton could release his papers today if he chose to do so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Just write a letter releasing them. Then it's off his plate and on someone else's. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I thought that wasnt legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. What 's not legal? Let President and Senator Clinton come flat out and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. The following makes it sound as if Bush has prevented it from happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Then why did Xenator Clinton keep saying the other night that it was up to President Clinton? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I assumed that was because it was his presidency and would be his place to work on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
7. First Lady doesn't count as Experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I'm wondering if the reason the papers are sealed is that they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. That's ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. If that is true, then it would be improper not to release the papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I think it depends on the first lady's actual experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. yes, and in her time in the Senate, she has made such brilliant decisions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Shrillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. I made that up myself just this morning. Quite the entendre don't you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. If You Made That Up Yourself Jessica Alba Is Sitting On My Lap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. hmm, intriguing riddle...Are you a Toilet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Neal Boortz, is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:13 AM Original message |
I Can Have Lots Of Fun With The Name "Jack" But I'll Resist My Darker Angels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. No - it's Hannitty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #7 |
22. The Clinton's are holding the line on principle. (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. that is the best laugh I've had today...Yes, she has such high principles when it comes to secrets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Shrillary... o yah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
18. What if the reason the Clintons want their papers sealed is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:10 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. no no... check this out. What if the REAL REAL reason the Clintons want their papers sealed is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Your satirical theories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. this makes even less sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. It's my turn isn't just the reason she's running, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Ibid. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
34. She's running for President for heaven's sake..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
42. If I'm not mistaken, it's not either of them who had anything to do with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
43. Hedgehog, I highly doubt it after 8 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC