Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards: Take back government from corporate interests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:57 AM
Original message
Edwards: Take back government from corporate interests
Edwards pleas: Take back government from corporate interests
By John Skipper--(Mason City, Iowa) Globe Gazette
Sunday, November 4, 2007

----
CHARLES CITY — Former U.S. Sen. John Edwards ignored a prepared speech on education Sunday and instead issued a plea for citizens to take back their government from corporate interests.

Prior to his appearance at the Charles City Library, aides distributed press releases about Edwards’ talk that indicated he would give details on his education plan.

When he spoke to the audience of about 200, he touched briefly on education and then launched into his main topic, saying, “We could be the first generation that doesn’t leave America a better place for our children and grandchildren than how we found it.”

Dressed in sport coat and jeans, Edwards gave many examples of what he considers government inefficiency and corruption.

“Look what our soldiers are doing in Iraq,” he said. “As for our government, we can’t even get the lights on in Baghdad.”

In this country, he compared the work of hundreds of volunteers who have helped Hurricane Katrina victims to the “mess” the government made of it.

“Why is there such a disconnect between the American people and their government?” he asked. “A lot of it is corruption that has taken place for over two decades.”

Edwards said there have been billions of dollars in no-bid contracts given to firms like Haliburton and others.

“We have CEOs who are driving companies into bankruptcy,” he said. “While their employees are losing jobs and pensions, the CEOs come out of it fine.

“And NAFTA. What did we get for NAFTA — millions of dollars in dangerous Chinese toys, that’s what,” he said.

Edwards said corporations and their lobbyists are running the country.

“This system is corrupt and rigged against you,” he said. “And if we replace corporate Republicans with a bunch of corporate Democrats, nothing is going to change.”

He said the reason all candidates for two decades have talked about universal health care and nothing has been done is that lobbyists are writing the laws.

“Drug companies and insurance companies have Republican lobbyists and Democratic lobbyists “but they all have the same boss,” Edwards said.

He said government employees have great health insurance plans.

“When this election is over, I’m going to be fine, Sen. Clinton is going to be fine and Sen. Obama is going to be fine. The question is, will America be fine?”

He said if elected, he will use his power to dismantle the congressional health care plan if Congress doesn’t pass universal health care legislation by July 2009.

On Iraq, he acknowledged he voted for the war.

“I was wrong,” he said. “I learned my lesson the hard way — but I learned my lesson.”

He concluded by repeating his warning about how the country is being run.

“The people in Washington have a vested interest in nothing changing,” Edwards said. “We must take the power away from corporate interests and return it to you.”

http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2007/11/04/latest_news/doc472e8dc8d82e7619625018.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is SO recommended.
This message can get him elected. He needs to stay on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R THis Needs To Be Cross Posted at GD
Edwards is right, and that is why he is the most feared of the leading candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's an excellent breakdown
on this from Kos: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/5/3444/83859

When asked, voters name Corruption as a top issue of concern.

When given some variation of Corruption and Ethics in Washington among their choices of concerns, the issue always ranks near the top. The issue is consistently ranked as important by 90% to 97% of all voters (depending upon what corruption stories are in the news).

Often Corruption is the #1 concern of voters.
More at Link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. If he would give this speech everywhere he goes, and mention it
on every TV appearance, and keep hammering it and hammering it, he will be the next President of the United States.





*whew!* Never thought I would say THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's great -- it separates him from the bull Clinton spews out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. but he takes money from corporate interests--at least she admits it
hedge funds are corporate interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards has tapped into many of my concerns....It is nice
to put a voice of concern to them... Thanks John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's been ongoing for longer than two decades.
Though the corruption seems to have become acute during that period.

I like this message of Edwards'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. all while protecting those
off shore accounts and Hedge funds... Hot air, with borrowed Ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Let's talk about your guy for a moment.
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 02:39 PM by JohnLocke
Hmm, Biden's #1 contributor in 2004, MBNA Corp. -- $147,700.

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00001669&cycle=2004

Hmm...

MBNA Corp is the nation’s top credit card company and one of the world’s biggest finance companies. The company was also the biggest campaign contributor to the Bush-Cheney ticket during the 2000 election cycle and has been one of the Republican Party’s most generous contributors over the last decade. For the last five years, MBNA has been pressing lawmakers to pass legislation that would make it harder for individuals to file bankruptcy—a bill that, if approved, stands to earn MBNA at least $100 million in additional revenues each year, according to press reports. The bank also has lobbied against legislation to protect consumer privacy rights and was a leading proponent of banking deregulation.

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.asp?ID=D000000114

Oh, but Biden says MBNA is an "outstanding corporate citizen."

http://biden.senate.gov/newsroom/details.cfm?id=240049

Hmm...

MBNA was one of the prime movers in lobbying for the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, which took 11 years and millions of dollars spent on lobbying before the act was finally passed when 15 Democrats (all of whom had received "campaign contributions" from MBNA, notably Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (D-DE) $147,700) joined with their Republican colleages to sign it into law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBNA#Politics

Let's see what Edwards says about this:

"Taking On Abusive Lenders and Helping Families Save"
http://johnedwards.com/issues/debt/

I think I'll go with Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. all old news and sources...
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 03:22 PM by Froward69
How about current tables...
commercial banks= http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/select.asp?Ind=F03
hedge funds= http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/select.asp?Ind=F27
just pull down and select the industry...

Still with John "used car" Edwards???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. 2008 - Biden received five times as much money from lobbyists
Tobacco
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D) $4,000 (Edwards $0)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/select.asp?Ind=A02

Lobbyists
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D) $111,810 (Edwards $21,500)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/select.asp?Ind=K02

Casinos/Gambling
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D) $20,470 (Edwards $14,255)

I really don't care much about Casinos/Gambling or Tobacco, but Biden got a lot of cash for a second-tier contender...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. OK I smoke and gamble...
in those categories Joe Biden gets more dollars than Edwards but take all the rest together and Edwards takes in way more money and owes far more favors than Joe Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's because Edwards is polling much better than Biden.
If Biden rose in the polls he would pull in a lot more cash. The astonishing thing is how much Biden has raised over Edwards from lobbyists even when Edwards polls much higher.

Biden ought to pledge not to take money from federal lobbyists, as Edwards has.
http://johnedwards.com/news/press-releases/20070804-lobbyist-donations/

Touché, my friend. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Polls mean nothing at this point...
Why bring them up? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I believe the category is "lawyers and lobbyists."
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 11:16 PM by JDPriestly
So, because I am a lawyer I get lumped in with the lobbyists although I assure you I am not heard in D.C. I wonder what casinos and gambling donors are giving to Edwards. I'd like more detail on that. That is an odd category. I do not like casinos or gambling. Why would they give to Edwards? Is it employees of casinos and gambling? Or companies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Bankruptcy Bill Biden and his "life begins at conception" voodoo vote to ban D&X procedures without
any exception for threats to the woman's life and his voodoo vote to ban any public funding for abortion is NOT AN OPTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. HUH?
Voodoo vote?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Voodoo vote = vote made on religious rather than political or logical or factual grounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. When is John going to demand the end to the lie of Corporate person hood?
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 02:29 PM by Vincardog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. I can't imagine anyone could reverse corporate person hood at this point
Not that I don't support it. Though stronger controls and better law enforcement seem more realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is THE key issue. It is why we get nowhere on Iraq, on "Free" Trade, on
health care, on education, on election reform, etc. And it is why his candidacy is trivialized when it is not ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
20. All I Can Actually Attest To Is This... IF, As So Many People Here At
DU think John Edwards is a devious, desperate candidate, then tell me WHY when MOST polls taken here, either He or Kucinich come out on top???

I will admit I haven't seen them all, but I know I have participated in quite a few myself and for the most part he polls better than Clinton or Obama. What does this say?? Are DU members just fudging here to make things "look" good for him?? I hardly think so when I see him getting bashed on a daily basis.

I don't feel that many Obama supporters are bashing him, but I do see some very nasty, distasteful and downright hateful posts here from many Clinton supporters. I'm not going to analyze their reasons, but I have come to some conclusions of my own.

What IS evident is that so many in D.C. and NY really have it in for him, and I DO believe they are doing all they can to stop any momentum for him. I myself believe that the DLC is behind this, and that they have some SUPER power AND will stop at nothing. This from Democrats who claim to be the party of a "big tent" is troubling to me! I see them resorting to some of the same tactics as what we have in the WH now! I suppose only time will tell, but if this barrage continues this country may have missed a very good chance of getting anything changed in D.C.

It may not be the "people" speaking once again, but I have lost faith in that idea a long time ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
23. he's right on... a populist message that resonates with the people.. GO EDWARDS!!
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 10:13 AM by BREMPRO
he's the most electable and a progressive candidate. He can engage voter emotions, unlike other policy wonk, less progressive, more divisive, guess who frontrunner. he'll do well in the south, north, east, west.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC