|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:13 PM Original message |
Terry McAuliffe has been talking to Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'd call McAuliffe clueless, but I'm sure he's well-clued-up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. As two shameless hypocrites, Terry and Ralph should get along fine. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terryg11
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. hey, I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm glad he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I'm glad too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hey, Terry- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquanut
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. How can they take responsibility for misguided voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. It's amazing how simple it is to be honest, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
candy331
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Tinoire you hit the nail on the head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:03 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Good summation! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:04 AM Response to Reply #20 |
43. Candy and Tinoire - sterling points*** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Nader DELIBERATELY threw the 2000 election to Bush, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Deliberately? You mean the Supreme Court had nothing to do with it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:55 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Once again: Nader DELIBERATELY threw the 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. The knee-jerk stuff is your links. We re-hashed those for 3+ years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 06:30 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I'm sorry to have to report that I missed your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. No problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
41. How'd they "foist" candidates upon us again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denverbill
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Who will McAuliffe blame if Kerry loses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. If you don't want Ralph running, offer him your OWN job, Terry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progress
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Why should he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:32 AM Response to Reply #9 |
42. I was mostly joking. I just think McAuliffe shouldn't whine about Nader.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
absyntheNsugar
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Great, from one egomaniac to another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hav
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
14. obviousy Terry and Ralph left the Lunch... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. I for one hope he succeeds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShimokitaJer
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
16. McAuliffe really doesn't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SEAburb
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. I hope the DNC takes their gloves off against Nader this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShimokitaJer
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Really? I hope they take their gloves off against Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SEAburb
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:16 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Nader isn't part of the Dem party, he's running against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BL_Zebub
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. McUseless couldn't do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. ya know if the dems started to listen and care about our issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SEAburb
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yeah diversity of ideas is bad, but lock step thinking like the Greens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShimokitaJer
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Lock step thinking like the Greens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You mean the Green Party that wouldn't touch Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShimokitaJer
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. Yes. That Green party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. isn't lock-step what you DEMS want? lock-step ABB? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mobuto
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. But it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShimokitaJer
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Really? What is the Dem Party platform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SEAburb
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. ABB has to do with supporting the dem that wins the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pezcore64
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. oh yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalebHayes
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
28. I agree with Terry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskerDem
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
38. I hope he takes some big ass union guys with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC