Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards Increasingly Fenced In By Federal Matching Funds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:24 PM
Original message
Edwards Increasingly Fenced In By Federal Matching Funds
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/11/12/edwards-increasingly-fenc_n_72190.html

The federal subsidies comes with strings attached that require Edwards to keep state-by-state spending, as well as the total amount he spends during the primary season, within preset limits -- limits which will not apply to his rivals, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who are not accepting federal subsidies and whose expenditures are therefore limited only by what they can raise privately.

Iowa is the place where federal spending limits will most severely constrain Edwards. Getting supporters to participate in caucuses is much more expensive than getting them to vote in a primary. In addition to television, caucus turnout requires mass mailings, phone banks, extensive transportation systems to get people to and from dispersed caucus locations when temperatures average 17 degrees.



Of the top three candidates, Edwards is currently the underdog in Iowa. The average results from the five most recent polls of likely Iowa caucus goers gives Clinton a 6.4-point lead, with 30 percent; Obama averages 23.6 percent; and Edwards 19.6 percent, according to RealClearPolitics.

With so much riding on the outcome, Edwards is gearing up to bet the bank on Iowa, but his bank, by 2008 standards, is peanuts. Privately, Edwards' aides estimate that Clinton and Obama have together already outspent him in Iowa by $8 million, a margin likely to double by caucus day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's A Smart Lawyer
I'm sure he'll find a way around the rules...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's taking public financing out of moral concerns, so
he'd have to be a hypocrite to do that.

He does have a hard cap of $43-50 Million, and there's no way he can lawyer his way out of that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It Seems IA Is Almost As Much About Organization And Logistics As Actual Support
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 03:37 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Of course you need a lot of supporters but logistics come into play when getting them to caucus...

My mom caucused for Ted Kennedy at a Daytona Beach straw poll in 1979... Daytona Beach was "Carter Country" and the Ted Kennedy caucusers were outnumbered and marginalized...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You know he didn't REALLY take public financing out of moral concerns, right?
Because I know some people believe that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I Think Geek Tragedy Was Being Sardonic
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Indeed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I had a feeling you were, but like I said, some people really believe it...
I guess I should've figured it out by the way you went on about him not wanting to look hypocritical. Sorry! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Good. Just making sure since I didn't see the sarcasm thingy.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone got figures on where and how much candidates have spent their money?
"The federal cap on total spending (television, offices, polling, etc.) in Iowa for Edwards is technically $3 million -- a figure that, when various exemptions and favorable rule interpretations are taken into account, can be pushed to just over $5 million, according to experts in campaign finance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Which means that
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 04:04 PM by liskddksil
once in office, Edward's will have no special interests to be beholden to other than the public, as he has refused lobbyists money. The same cannot be said of other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "Once elected." Problem is that he hands a HUGE advantage
to the Republican nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichDem10 Donating Member (644 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. So are you backing a candidate based on $$$ or issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Edwards is weak both on money and on issues.
He's spent much of 2007 running away from his brief Senate record.

The GOP will have him for breakfast should he outlast Hillary and Obama becoming the nominee. He will be in a severely weakened financial state dependent upon non coordinated pay media from the party & 527's while the GOP gets to blast him from the end of the primary process to the convention in late Aug. That he will get fair free media to compensate is a fairy tale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Has Edwards admitted that he
served in the US Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Issues. There are plenty of choices that
aren't screwed against the Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Matching funds has always been a double-edged sword.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Won't there more than likely be.....

4 or so other Democrats deciding to take the public financing too? I don't think it is as big a problem as some people think. Marta and I make sure every year our tax return has the election fund checked. We do the state endangered funding also.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC