|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:13 PM Original message |
Fear and loathing of Nader. Whoooo, DU has the willies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Relax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. But only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Well.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. Hey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
198. This sort of language is unacceptable and inappropriate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:32 AM Response to Reply #198 |
202. I've met Ralph Nader, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #202 |
204. As to the first part, you may have a point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
58. Hey, if you want to place your hand on a hot stove, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. It's not as if this wasn't expected. Ralph has been waiting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
47. Others? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #47 |
75. There was a lot of influence going on way before the first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:25 PM Response to Reply #75 |
95. Any proof with those accusations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. I'm sorry. The first memos went around last fall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:53 PM Response to Reply #101 |
157. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:09 PM Response to Reply #157 |
165. Thank you for your polite response. I want only to point out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:58 PM Response to Reply #95 |
121. Here is one of the memos. It appears to be the second one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:06 PM Response to Reply #95 |
126. Here's some more from Al From (though not the first memo)-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #95 |
129. Here's some more background from January: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:16 PM Response to Reply #95 |
132. Some more here, about a column From wrote and other things: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:35 PM Response to Reply #95 |
144. Osama ad info: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:36 PM Response to Reply #95 |
147. More Osama ad info (two links): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MuseRider
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. If Folks Want To Neutralize Nader, Nominate Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Not much of a choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. Your Opinion, Not Much Else, No Facts To Back It Up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. You're right-- it IS my opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
62. Plenty of facts. Just look at the polls, look at percentage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:58 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Nobody has conducted the poll that asks which do you really agree with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:17 PM Response to Reply #66 |
88. You are absolutely right. I have to say that, between the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #88 |
103. You don't think the amount of support he still has is amazing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:43 PM Response to Reply #103 |
109. I think Kerry is a good man too, and I will be proud to cast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:02 PM Response to Reply #109 |
164. I think Kerry is a typical politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:24 PM Response to Reply #164 |
169. It must be lonely on that righteous soapbox of yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:38 PM Response to Reply #169 |
174. Oh, Snoochie's not so all alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:49 PM Response to Reply #174 |
181. Your piousness qualifies you to be a republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:55 PM Response to Reply #181 |
185. Oh, Joey,Joey,Joey... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:55 PM Original message |
I don't form my opinions based on their popularity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hating Nader is not so new for a lot of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Really? Nader shares responsibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Yes, in a way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tedoll78
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. The Big Lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I respect your point of view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. I understand, but.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Hogwash, Mr. Fishbine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goobergunch
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:46 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. Can you prove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:47 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. That's the problem with the "Nader did it" mentality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Dream On, Dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
74. Where did they come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:15 PM Response to Reply #74 |
166. And The Great Majority Of Them, Dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goobergunch
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
94. I'm not psychic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
83. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
57. You may call me Herky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #57 |
70. More Nonsense, Mr. Fishbine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:10 PM Response to Reply #70 |
81. Oh, I have no doubt they will value the greater good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:53 PM Response to Reply #81 |
156. Oh, We Are In Agreement There, Dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #156 |
177. What benefit, please, Sir? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:22 AM Response to Reply #177 |
196. Crickets. And if this doesn't say it all...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:29 AM Response to Reply #196 |
207. Now There Is An Original Thought, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:47 PM Response to Reply #156 |
178. Then, Madam, pray tell, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:15 AM Response to Reply #178 |
193. Contempt For Turn-Coats And Fifth Columnists, Fellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:36 AM Response to Reply #193 |
200. You speak as though there were some sort of valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:04 AM Response to Reply #200 |
206. Good Luck, Dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
68. Please get off of this IWR issue. It is being blown way out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:44 PM Response to Reply #68 |
111. Kerry's vote bothers me because it was based in political expediency, not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:27 PM Response to Reply #111 |
136. If he was lied to, then what's your problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:17 PM Response to Reply #136 |
167. My problem is that either Kerry lied or was helplessly naive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:51 PM Response to Reply #167 |
182. That is your perception. Not mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:58 PM Response to Reply #182 |
188. Be serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
78. Isn't it a terrible, terrible thing when you find out your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:53 PM Response to Reply #78 |
183. Many of us, Joe, were involved in a flurry of letter writing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. agree - although hate is wrong word - disgusted with a sellout hero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KC21304
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
65. You have it exactly right. He was great on Phil Donahue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
71. Isn't it just a terrible, terrible thing when you realize your leaders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
55. I can top that. I've hated the SOB since the late 60s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
david_vincent
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. More than feelings get hurt when Bush bombs countries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. I don't like Nader, but I respect his right to run or anyones for that . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. I don't respect a damn thing about Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. He can only "do" something if people vote for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
50. Bull, Nader is a no good rotten bastard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
56. I happen to agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
79. No it doesn't solve the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. "rotten egotistical irresponsible bastards" are allowed to run for Prez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. Yeah! As a matter of fact-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:34 PM Response to Reply #87 |
104. Heh, you got that right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShimokitaJer
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:00 AM Response to Reply #82 |
189. Actually, I'm pretty sure it's a prerequisite for running for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:05 AM Response to Reply #189 |
191. Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShimokitaJer
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:19 AM Response to Reply #191 |
195. Good point. Maybe it's a prerequisite for winning the presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
91. Don't kid yourself. He did plenty to hurt this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. Amen, Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. The primaries were all about "electability" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
59. Agreed. Nader said he would run if... and he did... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
85. The timing could not have been more perfect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meti57b
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
14. what nader offers, is another four years of bush! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. You think this is all a big joke? It's not funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. I agree - our kids future is on the line - and Nader is pissing on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. The only way Nader is a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KC21304
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
76. I guess that would depend on the number of votes Nader would get, eh ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:18 PM Response to Reply #76 |
89. I'm ABK all the way in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:27 PM Response to Reply #89 |
97. You have a shot memory, walt. Just go back to 4 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:43 PM Response to Reply #97 |
110. You've left out something, this isn't four years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:29 PM Response to Reply #110 |
137. Do you make this stuff up as you go along? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. Nope, I'll tell you a little secret |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:27 PM Response to Reply #138 |
171. Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, walt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:19 AM Response to Reply #171 |
209. If that's true, then you should be yucking it up about how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
77. Give it a rest. The VOTERS have decided Kerry is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #77 |
92. I'm voting for the ham sandwich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:29 PM Response to Reply #92 |
100. By the way, walt. John Kerry is not a "ham sandwich" like you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:38 PM Response to Reply #100 |
106. Respect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:47 PM Response to Reply #106 |
114. And Kucinich has never, never , never voted with repugs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:18 PM Response to Reply #114 |
133. He did, and has since realized the error he made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:46 PM Response to Reply #100 |
113. Ahhhhh, I understand now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:49 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. I'm not at all interested in what inside jokes may have occurred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:52 PM Response to Reply #115 |
118. I'm giving all the respect I can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:05 PM Response to Reply #118 |
125. There's a new hall monitor in town |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. Well, it goes back a loooooooong ways on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #127 |
139. Boorish, walt. Not even in the realm of humor. Move on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. Sure thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:36 PM Response to Reply #141 |
146. What is your trip, man? Why do seem so intent on pushing things? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:41 PM Response to Reply #146 |
149. My trip? I'm on a journey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:59 PM Response to Reply #149 |
160. Can't argue with that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:29 PM Response to Reply #149 |
172. There are no ham sandwiches on the ballot, walt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:23 AM Response to Reply #172 |
212. It looks to me like there will be a Ham Sandwich with a (D) after his name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #149 |
176. !!!!!!!!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:08 AM Response to Reply #149 |
205. In the spirit of ABB you should demand we get aboard or taste your steel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #127 |
142. It is pretty easy to tell who is here for serious discussion, walt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:35 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. Yep, it sure is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:40 PM Response to Reply #143 |
148. You helped slice it, Walt. Now eat it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:42 PM Response to Reply #148 |
150. I told you, no matter what come November 2nd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:34 PM Response to Reply #150 |
173. You have made that abundantly clear walt. are you always so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:20 AM Response to Reply #173 |
210. The Ham sandwich gets my vote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:23 PM Response to Reply #92 |
168. I see you read my post carefully and absorbed it completely. <snerk> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:52 PM Response to Reply #77 |
155. The voters have decided? In February? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:03 AM Response to Reply #155 |
190. THANK YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
93. That is patently false, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. You realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:39 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. TRUTHALERT!!! TRUTHALERT!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. And with jokes and punchlines--as we all know-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalBuster
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #32 |
53. What's with all these fear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RIindependent
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
21. Nader is egocentric. He should find another Corvair to fight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. LOL @ Corvair comment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:13 AM Response to Reply #27 |
192. Then it doesn't matter if Nader runs, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thistle42
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
29. If he does run... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Al From pushed for the Dean ouster pretty heavily. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
30. Loathing, Mr. Fishbine, Not Fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RIindependent
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Right on Magistrate!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. You disappoint me, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
64. That Will Be Borne Up Under Somehow, Mr. Fishbine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:19 PM Response to Reply #64 |
90. It seems quite clear to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:49 PM Response to Reply #90 |
179. No One Is Calling You A Reactionary, Dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goobergunch
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
46. Given that a vote for X is a vote for X |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
38. I dislike him because he is a "phony" and a Narcissistic egotist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
39. Dissonance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
42. Not sudden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InhaleToTheChief
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
43. Unrepentant Nader Voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:47 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. There Are No Safe States, Dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. Rhetorical crap notwithstanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InhaleToTheChief
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #49 |
72. What of the need for a true progressive party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poskonig
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:04 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. We'll have rightward drift for 40 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
96. Don't expect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
98. So you don't think Texas is a safe state to vote green? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. DU link below gives some interesting Nader facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RIindependent
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
80. This is not the time to experiment with the USA!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InhaleToTheChief
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:14 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. I agree RI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RIindependent
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
86. Welcome to DU Unrepentant Nader Voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
52. We are afraid, and we have every right to be. But not for your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poskonig
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
60. I am ashamed I voted for Nader in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kaitykaity
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
67. An insult to DUers everywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #67 |
102. three percent could swing an election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kaitykaity
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:59 PM Response to Reply #102 |
122. Yeah, I think it already did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #67 |
215. That's what a lot of people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
absyntheNsugar
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
99. KERRY IS A LIBERAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:29 AM Response to Reply #99 |
199. Thank you for the permission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democat
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
105. This is Democratic Underground, Nader & Bush are not Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:38 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Where did he say anything about voting for Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:42 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Best post in the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:50 PM Response to Reply #107 |
116. Never mind what he said Walt. The mere presence of the word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:51 PM Response to Reply #107 |
117. Apparently, you have the market cornered on the word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:57 PM Response to Reply #107 |
120. Thanks Walt. You put the words right in my mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:00 PM Response to Reply #120 |
123. The election will be about 50/50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:02 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Then "electability" as an issue in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. Perhaps we're defining electability differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:11 PM Response to Reply #128 |
130. I'm no scholar by any means but my best guess would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:36 PM Response to Reply #130 |
145. Sadly, Nader is not the only factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:44 PM Response to Reply #145 |
151. He definitely was not the only factor I took into account |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:44 PM Response to Reply #130 |
152. No one underestimated the so called "Nader Factor, walt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:47 PM Response to Reply #152 |
154. Then I guess all tat talk about "electability" was just a scam? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:55 PM Response to Reply #154 |
184. No scam walt. The Nader factor has always been there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:25 AM Response to Reply #184 |
213. Then obviously those who made the claim that Kerry is "electable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:13 PM Response to Reply #123 |
131. I doubt your assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #123 |
186. If that's the case and so many want Nader out- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
112. DLC getting scared & making noise. That's all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 09:55 PM Response to Reply #112 |
119. What it proves to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:23 PM Response to Reply #119 |
134. Where did the 'electability' meme come from this primary season? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:24 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. I'm not certain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:45 PM Response to Reply #119 |
153. How so, walt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:55 PM Response to Reply #153 |
158. If Kerry was so "electable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:56 PM Response to Reply #119 |
159. Of course it was. It was a term coined by those who wanted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:26 PM Response to Reply #159 |
170. Lol... Well they sure as hell found an even vaguer slogan - "ABB" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:43 PM Response to Reply #170 |
175. You have a point there, Tinoire! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #119 |
187. Bullshit walt? I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:22 AM Response to Reply #187 |
211. Bullshit littlejoe? ABSOFUCKINLUTELY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
140. Nader just wants attention. He's a lonely, pathetic old man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 10:59 PM Response to Reply #140 |
161. That's a perfectly reasonable thing to say about a misunderstood man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:01 PM Response to Reply #161 |
163. Nader is very anti-Democratic. He's Bush's lap dog, just like Blair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:49 PM Response to Reply #163 |
180. No, Nader's not a lap dog. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Fri Feb-20-04 11:00 PM Response to Reply #140 |
162. post 141 giving attention to Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:16 AM Original message |
I'm not scared of Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
194. I'm not scared of Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldberg
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
197. Nader would do nothing but ruin it for the Democrats... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:48 AM Response to Reply #197 |
201. If he "won't get any amount of votes", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
203. Plenty of hate. No fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Piperay
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
208. I have no fear of nader...only complete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whirlygigspin
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:32 AM Response to Reply #208 |
214. I bet you miss Dean now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC