Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shame on you, Edwards, and thank you, Senator Dodd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:54 AM
Original message
Shame on you, Edwards, and thank you, Senator Dodd
For Edwards to evade the question of supporting the nominee - if s/he is not him - is a disgrace.

Here we are, on DU, keep telling everyone that we need to vote for the nominee, whoever s/he is. That it is the Supreme Court which is in the balance. That the worst candidate is better than any Republican and Edwards is ready to tell his supporters to stay home? To repeat what happened in 1968?

Senator Dodd should be applauded to ask Edwards which Republican candidate would be better than Clinton.

Edwards should understand how the Supreme Court can make a hard right turn, a turn that will not be able to correct for generation.

I regret sending those hundreds of dollars to Edwards. I want them transferred to Joe Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, yes. We can repeat this meme ad nauseum.
I wouldn't have answered it at this point either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards is all about Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Nonsense.The one who is all about themselves is Hillary.She has never
sacrificed a thing for this nation and never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. YOU must be off your meds... Edwards said nothing of the kind
SHAME ON YOU.

When asked the question Edwards said he was 'not ready to talk about that now.' He even clarified that He expected to support the Democratic Nominee and he expected to be the Democratic Nominee.

You have somehow managed to twist his words to a meaning they did not have.

Edwards understands everything you accuse him of not understanding.

Sen Dodd knows that , and shame on him for a superficial attack on Edwards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Hillary folks are riding this for all they're worth...
Not that it's saying much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Keep spinning.
He cleared that up yesterday. And he didn't evade a question as to whether he would support the democratic nominee. He said he didn't want to answer regarding a specific candidate at that time and why in the hell should he? How fair would that be to the other candidates?

Edwards clarifies remarks on supporting nominee
By Klaus Marre--The Hill
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
----
Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) on Tuesday clarified a remark that some had interpreted as meaning he would not support Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) should she become the Democratic presidential nominee.

"I fully expect to support the Democratic nominee, and I fully expect to be the Democratic nominee," Edwards said Tuesday.
(...)
It is rare for any candidate seeking the nomination of their party not to pledge to support the eventual nominee. This year, a couple of Republican candidates, Reps. Ron Paul (Texas) and Tom Tancredo (Colo.), have indicated that they might not back the GOP nominee.

http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/edwards-clarifies-remarks-on-supporting-democratic-nominee-2007-11-13.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. If he'd said that when they asked him, he'd have saved himself some angst. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. well, now-I washed my ears today--Edwards said he would support the nominee!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh for heaven's sake, of course he will support the nominee, which might be himself
I wouldn't have answered that "gotcha" question either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh fer the love of GAWD
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 02:30 AM by tkmorris
Is NO ONE in GD: P ever just honest anymore? Is that all there is? Ridiculous, inane, vitriolic swipes at other candidates just for the sake of doing so?

This isn't politics, it's a room full of rabid wolverines fighting over the last scrap of food. Take a deep breath, have a glass of wine, take the dog for a walk. Whatever it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Could we knock it off about "shame?"
He's a candidate running a hard-nosed campaign. So is Hillary, so is Obama. Edwards is betting he can capitalize on anti-Clinton sentiment. I hope he can't, because I don't like that kind of politicking, but getting outraged about it is silly.

I do, however, appreciate your approval of Joe Biden. It isn't too late for him to make a splash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. LOL!
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 02:45 AM by Nutmegger
GD: P has been rife with this nonsense all day.

Edwards 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Get over yourself. He was asked a STUPID question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC