|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 12:16 PM Original message |
I apologize to the "diamonds or pearls' questioner from last night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yep. It was obvious who CNN's candidate was. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah. That's it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I bow to your well-reasoned argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. More proof the corporate fix is in. What a total waste of a question when there are so many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. it was a stupid and sexist question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I felt there was something wrong there long before that question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Why does CNN get to plant questions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Don't you know anything about show business? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think they read one of my posts here about boxers or briefs. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well, what can anyone expect from CNN?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. "Forced to ask" frilly question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NI4NI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
10. except for the oppurtunity to get in front of a national tv audience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
klook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
13. Pathetic excuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CnAnPB (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Agree 100% - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. Good of you to apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. Wasn't the previous you tube debate on CNN? The impeachment question was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-16-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. Unless they drugged her, she is still responsible for the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC