|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:44 AM Original message |
If you vote for Kucinich in the primary, you're not ABB. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. Please stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
2. What does ABB stand for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bronco69
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Anybody But Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
3. We must purge the Bush-loving Kucinich fans from the Party! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. Kucinich will support the eventual Democratic nominee n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whirlygigspin
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. A vote for Sharpton is a vote for Hitler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Him too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskerDem
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
160. EXACTLY ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
5. That is not even funny!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. true, it's past funny, and yet ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:53 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Odd how much some here sound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. irony is not permissible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. LOL! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
139. What do you mean, "soon"...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snoochie
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
155. That's not what they're saying now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
128. I think Bullgooseloony is completely aware of the irony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:08 AM Response to Reply #12 |
63. Did someone say "cognitive dissonance?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #63 |
159. the mysterious truth unveiled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
6. *flabbergasted* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TN al
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
9. Please people who say that are no better than right wing hate radio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
11. Oh Geez! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:52 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Hey hey read the last line! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I totally agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. The people doing it won't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:56 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. My bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
16. That's false. A vote for Kucinich in no way increases the chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. No, it's not the same logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Of course it's the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. No one said that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Errr- maybe you haven't been in this forum much?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
22. Haha. Yep, and that voice is only going to get louder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
25. I encourage all to vote their choice....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
28. not just a traitor to the Party but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:26 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Hopefully that is a sarcastic remark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:28 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. It is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:36 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. excellent question and observation, Iverson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Um, if I answer honestly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. of course it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:37 AM Response to Reply #29 |
36. You did see the comments by some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. you do realize diamondsoul |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamondsoul
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:59 AM Response to Reply #38 |
46. Yes, I do, sorry, budda! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:08 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. oh thank goodness, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:59 AM Response to Reply #36 |
47. I missed those, but between Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
32. Dean, Nader, Edwards, Kucinich, Sharpton--traitors all!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #32 |
41. I Choose To Do What's Best For The Country. I Choose NOT To Validate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:56 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:01 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. he has gotta be, "...choose to enable to criminal Bush*." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Kerry enabled Iraq war, NCLB, USA Patriot, Scalia to Supreme... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:08 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Don't forget the PBA ban! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:02 AM Response to Reply #41 |
52. Which fringe folks? The ones who want to piss on graves, threaten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:49 AM Response to Reply #52 |
77. Grave Pissing And Grave Dancing Is Hardly The Crime You Pretend It To Be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:00 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. They decided to permit it. That is their decison...mine is to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Guess What? --- I... Don't... Care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. I feel no rage at the moment, Only amusement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:50 PM Response to Reply #87 |
94. "I am done calling for civility." --- PROMISE???!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:54 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. Let's put it this way...I am done EXPECTING it from certain quarters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:54 PM Response to Reply #82 |
134. Clue for arwalden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:03 PM Response to Reply #134 |
140. What Has Two Thumbs And Doesn't Give A Crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:27 PM Response to Reply #140 |
147. They have stuff to fix that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #140 |
152. you care so little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:08 PM Response to Reply #140 |
154. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!! You SO do not give a crap!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:08 PM Response to Reply #134 |
142. Thanks for posting this, Eloriel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #77 |
151. Hardly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 04:26 PM Response to Reply #151 |
165. No... Just the fringe left, Kamikaze left, suicidal self-destructive left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 01:43 AM Response to Reply #165 |
166. You know, you're right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
138. Oh, "growing up" means I should vote YOUR choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #138 |
164. Who Could Imagine Anyone Voting To Spite A Faceless Stranger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
150. Charming Allen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #150 |
163. In Your Heart You Know I'm Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revcarol
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
37. Thanks for the laugh!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
39. BULL FUCKING SHIT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whirlygigspin
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:50 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. ah the real traitors are finally revealed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. such thoughtfulness, arwalden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:02 AM Response to Reply #42 |
53. Please... Don't Be Absurd! I'm Not Trying To Persuade Anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. frames |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:12 AM Response to Reply #55 |
66. That Is Correct. Partly... Either they do not have a "rational motive" OR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:46 PM Response to Reply #66 |
161. more to be pitied than despised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:25 PM Response to Reply #55 |
85. BTW: Don't Be Confused... No... You Didn't Mention My Sexuality... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:09 AM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Actually Arwalden, your posts make very persuasive arguments--for Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:18 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. That Message Makes About As Much Sense As... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:34 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. I guess you missed my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:10 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. No... I'm A Lot Smarter Than Folks Think I Am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:37 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. Whatever. I forgot this is not about Nader or Kerry after all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:07 PM Response to Reply #83 |
141. You're beginning to sound paranoid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:46 PM Response to Reply #53 |
91. You're right. We can't be persuaded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #91 |
162. Horse. Dead. Beaten. Nose. Face. Spited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:57 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Sorry, but you're not allowed to vote for Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:05 AM Response to Reply #45 |
57. "Doo-dah! Doo-dah!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:06 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Martyr or shill, take your pick. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:15 AM Response to Reply #58 |
67. In the end, what really convinces ABB is the best POV is the eloquence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Again And Again... People Miss The Point. --- The Rabid Psychotic Maniacs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. LOL who's rabid? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:39 AM Response to Reply #71 |
75. To whom are you referring? Most of the bile I have seen here lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #71 |
76. Deleted message |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:50 AM Response to Reply #76 |
78. At this point, I will admit that I am enjoying some of this panic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:01 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. No Irony... Just A Close Election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:55 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. This Makes No Sense At All, Buddhamama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:21 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. the lunatic fringe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. The Lunatic Fringe Has Not Been Paying Attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. you've debunked them??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:51 PM Response to Reply #89 |
96. Been There, Debunked That. -- Next! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:57 PM Response to Reply #96 |
106. "LALALALALALALA" in other words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:01 PM Response to Reply #96 |
110. hmmm, ok. but telling yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #110 |
115. Yawn. --- In An Alternate Universe, Perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:17 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:30 PM Response to Reply #117 |
126. Even if it wasn't, there are TONS of reasons they should have voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:33 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. oh i agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:26 PM Response to Reply #115 |
124. some lack fundamental understanding of who our Reps work for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:39 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. Which lunatic fringe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:48 PM Response to Reply #86 |
92. The FACT is that Kerry and Edwards voted to support most of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:51 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. Been There, Debunked That. -- Next! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:52 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Well THAT sure convinces ME!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:55 PM Response to Reply #97 |
103. I Told You Already... I'm Not Here To Convince The Lunatic Fringe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:56 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Why ARE you here? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:17 PM Response to Reply #104 |
145. To Yank Your Chain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:14 PM Response to Reply #145 |
156. HAHA HAHA HA HA!!!! This is too funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:55 PM Response to Reply #95 |
102. NooooOOOo! YOU'RE debunked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:56 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. I Told You Already... I'm Not Here To Convince The Lunatic Fringe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:59 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. We've been OVER the facts, Arwalden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:09 PM Response to Reply #107 |
113. This Is Not About ME, Mr. Loony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:20 PM Response to Reply #113 |
121. And "this" is what? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:10 PM Response to Reply #121 |
143. Your Vanity Thread, Obviously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:12 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. Lemme guess...you want my thread? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:00 AM Response to Reply #39 |
50. Traitors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:07 AM Response to Reply #50 |
60. Certainly They May Vote For Whomever They Please... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:52 PM Response to Reply #60 |
98. You are making one hell of a lot of assumptions here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:17 PM Response to Reply #98 |
118. I Think That There Has Been A Misunderstanding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:15 PM Response to Reply #118 |
157. I think we understand completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #157 |
158. Must You Interrupt The Only Civil Discussion Within This Thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
48. Yep, the primaries are over. Our candidate has been chosen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #48 |
74. More Absurdity! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:59 PM Response to Reply #74 |
108. I believe that's what I just said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indiana Democrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
49. You're right about one thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:03 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. But what if in some fluke Kucinich actually WINS the nomination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indiana Democrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:07 AM Response to Reply #54 |
59. If Kucinich wins the nomination (He won't, and you know it)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
65. BULLGooseLoony, that's just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. I know BullGooseLoony...and you're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
70. Well, your title ought to keep this on the front page! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #70 |
146. Call me the Fool too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
93. Please, using some sort of formalism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:52 PM Response to Reply #93 |
99. The ABB line of logic centers around getting Bush out of office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:03 PM Response to Reply #99 |
111. No, it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:08 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Both Nader and Kucinich have the SAME probability of beating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:12 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Um... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. I'm not voting for either of them...most likely...however, in any case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:19 PM Response to Reply #116 |
120. No, voters blindly following "principles" that were more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:22 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. The voters putting cowards in the Senate is what got us here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
100. Why are you putting words in other people's mouths? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:00 PM Response to Reply #100 |
109. I'm not. Just following the logic line. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #109 |
119. No, you're making up offensive views and ascribing them to others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:24 PM Response to Reply #119 |
123. This is ABB. If you're offended by it, you should rethink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:28 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. I don't care how many times you tell me what I think -YOU ARE WRONG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:33 PM Response to Reply #125 |
130. I'm not saying you really believe this. I'm sure you don't- it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:31 PM Response to Reply #109 |
127. No you aren't, as I demonstrated above (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:40 PM Response to Reply #127 |
131. Yes, I am- neither of them would have a snowball's chance in hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
132. That's not our logic; You can vote for anyone in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:47 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. If all that matters is getting Bush out of office, don't you HAVE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:55 PM Response to Reply #133 |
135. ABB isn't about the candidate most likely to beat Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 01:58 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. And why should I get strongly behind the eventual Dem nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:00 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. Because the US is a two-party system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:33 PM Response to Reply #137 |
149. the U.S. is not a parliamentary system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:52 PM Response to Reply #149 |
153. It would be nice if we could attract more voters.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Sat Feb-21-04 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
148. That makes no sense whatsoever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
167. stupid load of flamebait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 02:59 AM Response to Reply #167 |
168. What makes this a particularly brain-dead notion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC