|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
kentuck
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:11 PM Original message |
Iowans were 'snakebit' by Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Demolished, Kentuck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Perhaps that is not the correct word? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. now I get you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. And that is exactly why Rove was on TV this morning.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. That would have happened with any candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. "Demolished" would feed into the "mandate" that Bush claimed he had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. the only problem with your hind sight is Iowans DID think long and hard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. Says who? I heard that from a few mainstream reporters this morning, the same ones who have never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. "Democrats would be better if they simply chose someone that best represented the Party" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. Kerry was the best candidate in the field. That is why Iowans voted for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Kerry was better than Dean?? At the very least, that's very arguable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 08:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. At caucus time Kerry's campaign organization in Iowa was better than Dean's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I think he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Look, I don't want to re-fight '04, but if Dean was so great, then he would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. No problem. You make a strong case. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
11. Don't blame me...I caucused for Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Thank you. At least your work helped Dean become Chairman and that's been good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
18. I miss President Kerry. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 01:44 AM Response to Original message |
19. Senator Kerry was by far the best candidate in 2004 and if he were running for Pres. this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 02:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Indeed, Wisteria. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Me too - I'm 57 and it is by far my proudest vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
21. Make no mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC