On ABC news this morning, the WH spin on Iran is "new information"

[DCKit]

They haven't been sitting on the NEI report at all, they JUST found out that the Iranians quit their attempts to build nuclear weapons FOUR YEARS AGO.

Valerie Plame, we need you!!!

[Sherman A1]

1. Then they spin it as the WH is incompetent?

As with Iraq, they are either culpable or incompetent. In either case the are failures and we are not getting what we should from our Tax Dollars.



:argh:

[jimshoes]

2. It's probably new information

to at least one person in the administration, he seldom reads anything, so in a way it's true. But why did deadeye let this slip by? That's the question.

[sam sarrha]

3. and there is only one person in the WH that cant read, the child that was left behind..the village

idiot.. who is to F'n stupid to know he is be'n played for the patsy

[luckyleftyme2]

4. just shows you who's running the country

I'm beginning to think we should purge our intel. agencies. I think they've gotten stale.
I mean 4 years ago and their just finding out.(ya and the checks in the mail)
COULD IT BE BIDENS THREAT TO IMPEACH THE PUPPET IF HE ATTACKED IRAN? YOU BET THE COUNTRY WOULD RALLY AROUND BIDEN! HE MAY BE A LOOSE CANNON BUT HES THE SMARTEST ONE WE GOT!

[Rageneau]

5. Yeah, but Saddam is still Hitler right?

We can't just leave him in power, can we?

Of course, I don't really mean Saddam, I mean that Ahmahanjob fellow, but I can't spell his name.

So Saddam will have to do.

Nukes or no nukes, we can't leave him in power, can we?

[Lasher]

6. Maybe we'll bring freedom to the Iranians by blowing them up.

Worked pretty good in that other Ira-country didn't it?

[luckyleftyme2]

8. FOR LACK OF A NAME

YOU COULD SUBSTITUTE ; shorty! midget! little one! we would recognize him but any of these.

[HuffleClaw]

7. seriously?

why not just claim the dog ate the homework. THAT would be more plausible.