|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:25 AM Original message |
I hate to say I told you so.... Councilman Joe Cimperman to run for Kucinich's seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrsT
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
1. Does anyone think this because of the Ron Paul vice president thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I doubt it, and I wouldn't be surprised if Dennis decides not to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That's how it looks to me, too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NavyDavy
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. i think it is part of the reason he's being challenged, IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:44 AM Response to Reply #3 |
15. He is being challenged because there are a lot of political figures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. This challenger brought to you by the DLC and the owners of the Corporate Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Oh come on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. no one sees Kucinich as being a serious threat to the powers that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Ok, ok, I'm streching things for effect. Sheesh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I'll agree with that. Trouble is most people don't pay attention. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Please, why didn't they do this last time Kucinich ran? Can you provide some factual basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Cimmpermann is not DLC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
38. Whether or not he himself is DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. You had to inject logic and ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I don't do conspiracies on Tuesday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
8. What happened to the steak woman? Palmer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yes, but she is not being taken seriously.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Good. Quite frankly, I don't think she added much to the last cycle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Steak woman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Rosemay has the backing of Paul Hacket, but she has been very quiet so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I really don't think Hackett has any sway whatso ever in the 10th |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. I agree. Didn't see his name on her homepage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Hi, Ninga. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Hi back sweetie....if I may be so bold....flirting in public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Darlin', you can flirt with me any ol' time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
16. Whoa, this is big news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Dea DePiero may jump in the race as well as Tom O'Grady.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. It seems like Dennis will be in trouble n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Dennis is a master at self promotion, and I resent very much, his strong allegiance with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I forgot all about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. He's always relied on the voters to keep his seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. probaly if you lived in Cleveland or knew Kucinich's history you would have understood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I used to live there, and have followed Kooch for decades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. So you did understand what I was saying, I apologize for sounding terse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. There needs to be an "irony" emoticon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
35. I saw this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-04-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
37. Those corporate powers that be are SUPER DUBER powerful! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC