As Iowa Race Tightens, Clinton Decides the Best Defense Is a Good Offense

[DeepModem Mom]

WP: As Iowa Race Tightens, Clinton Decides the Best Defense Is a Good Offense
By Dan Balz and Anne E. Kornblut
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, December 4, 2007; Page A04

DES MOINES, Dec. 3 -- Just two months ago, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York appeared to have turned a corner in Iowa. Now, as the race here enters its final month, she is once again fighting to fend off concerns that have dogged her from the start of her campaign in the state. "Around the time of the October poll, what preceded it was sort of a golden age for her," said J. Ann Selzer, the director of the respected Iowa Poll. "She was in control of the message, the debates were going well and she was grinding down the naysayers. It sounds like it didn't take much for that image to stumble. All those things that were lurking there have come back."

Selzer described a cluster of concerns that voters here have about Clinton. She is seen as capable, experienced and the most knowledgeable about the world. But her negatives are significantly higher than those of any of her leading rivals. Asked which candidate they would be most disappointed to see as their nominee in the Iowa Poll, Democrats put Clinton at the top of the list, with 27 percent citing her. "That's more people saying she would be the worst choice than who say would be the best choice," Selzer said. She called it "that 'ick' factor."

Clinton's response has been to turn aggressive. For the second day in a row, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination in national polls sharply attacked her leading rival, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, using some of the harshest language of the campaign. Arguing that her campaign is in a "very strong position," Clinton hammered Obama for offering "false hopes" rather than action. She predicted that voters will want, in her words, "a doer, not a talker."...

The turnabout in two months is revealing. In October, the Iowa Poll taken for the Des Moines Register showed Clinton gaining ground on her rivals and leading with 29 percent. Edwards was at 23 percent and Obama at 22 percent. The latest survey, released on Sunday, showed Obama rising to 29 percent, Clinton slipping slightly to 25 percent and Edwards holding steady.

Clinton advisers say her tougher rhetoric is not a result of the new poll but rather the consequence of weeks of assaults on her by Obama and Edwards....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/03/AR2007120302112.html

[R_M]

1. Of course! The defense is an offense.

The Democratic party needs to learn this.

As for Hillary, :thumbsup:
:kick:

[Adelante]

2. What does this mean?

Christie Vilsack, the wife of former Iowa governor Tom Vilsack and a Clinton supporter, said she thinks polls are missing many of the women who are likely to turn out for Clinton.

Why would that be?