Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reaction to the Latest Zogby Polls (TIA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 11:17 AM
Original message
Reaction to the Latest Zogby Polls (TIA)

Reaction to the Latest Zogby Polls

TruthIsAll 12/2/07

http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/DuKosZogby.htm

A DUer just quoted Kos regarding the latest Zogby interactive polling which show Hillary trailing all Republicans and Edwards and Obama beating them. Now many DUers laud Kos in proclaiming that the polls are bogus since they are a self-selected sample. They assert that since Hillary is winning all the other polls, Zogby must be wrong.

Kos has zero credibility in polling analytics. He has prohibited discussion of the 2004 theft and has called the work of dedicated analytic researchers (including yours truly) "crap". He ignores or fails to understand the statistical analyses which determined to an overwhelming mathematical probability that the election was stolen.

Another DUer posts daily poll stats and appears to be a Hillary supporter. But when new polls come out showing she is slipping, he blames the messenger! He denigrates Zogby's interactive polling without understanding the methodology. He claims that Zogby was wrong in projecting Kerry as the winner in 2004. In effect, he is arguing that the recorded vote was correct and therefore the exit polls (which confirmed the Zogby polls) were wrong. He must also believe there was zero fraud and that Bush won fair and square.

Now here's the main point regarding Zogby's just-released set of polls that everyone seems to miss: The only reason that HRC leads the 3-way polls with BO and JE is that the latter two are splitting the true Progressive/Liberal vote. That’s not to say that Hillary would lose the General election. I believe that she would defeat any Republican. It’s just that BO and JE are stronger candidates who would motivate the base much more than Hillary could.

Zogby polls have been proven to be very reliable. His 2004 projections closely matched the exit polls which showed Kerry to be the winner. Let's take a close look at 2004 Zogby pre-election polls in some key battleground states.

Zogby 2004 Battleground States

Interactive and Telephone polls vs. Actuals

Interactive Polling - 20 states
   Average 5.88% discrepancy between projections and actuals
  Avg        Kerry   Bush
Poll 49.60 48.35
Proj 51.14 48.86
Actual 47.85 51.45
Diff 3.29 -2.59

Telephone Polling - 10 states
   Average 4.55% discrepancy between projections and actuals
  Avg        Kerry   Bush
Poll 48.80 47.10
Proj 51.88 48.13
Actual 49.20 50.00
Diff 2.68 -1.87

Projection Assumption (2-party):   Kerry won 75% of undecided and 3rd party voters

Actual-Recorded Interactive Poll Projection Change Telephone Poll Projection

Kerry Bush Kerry Bush Kerry Bush Margin Kerry Bush Kerry Bush

Avg 47.85 51.45 49.60 48.35 51.14 48.86 5.88 48.80 47.10 51.88 48.12

AR 45 54 47 50 49.25 50.75 7.5
AZ 44 55 46 52 47.50 52.50 6.0
CO 47 52 48 50 49.50 50.50 4.0 47 49 50.00 50.00
FL 47 52 48 51 48.75 51.25 2.5 48 48 51.00 49.00
IA 49 50 52 46 53.50 46.50 8.0 50 45 53.75 46.25

MI 51 48 52 46 53.50 46.50 4.0 52 46 53.50 46.50
MN 51 48 53 45 54.50 45.50 6.0 51 45 54.00 46.00
MO 46 54 48 51 48.75 51.25 5.5
NC 44 56 48 51 48.75 51.25 9.5
NH 50 49 50 46 53.00 47.00 5.0

NM 49 50 54 45 54.75 45.25 10.5 51 48 51.75 48.25
NV 48 51 46 51 48.25 51.75 -0.5 45 50 48.75 51.25
OH 49 51 47 52 47.75 52.25 -2.5 43 49 49.00 51.00
OR 52 48 54 44 55.50 44.50 7.0
PA 51 49 51 47 52.50 47.50 3.0 50 46 53.00 47.00

TN 43 57 47 50 49.25 50.75 12.5
VA 45 54 49 49 50.50 49.50 10.0
WA 53 46 55 44 55.75 44.25 4.5
WI 50 49 51 47 52.50 47.50 4.0 51 45 54.00 46.00
WV 43 56 46 50 49.00 51.00 11.0

Zogby Final Polling vs. Exit Polls – 9 Battleground states

Kerry led by 50.2-44.8% (9 poll average).

Election Model base case assumption:   Kerry captures 75% of the undecided vote.

Result:   Kerry wins all 9 states; projected average vote share within 0.3% of the exit poll average.
Average    Kerry   Bush

Zogby 50.2 44.8 (Election Day polling)
Recorded 50.1 49.5 (actual recorded vote)
Projection 53.7 45.9 (75% undecided to Kerry)
Exit Poll 53.2 45.8 (unadjusted, based on average precinct WPE)

Difference 0.5 0.1
            Zogby Poll       Projection         Exit Poll        Recorded

St Kerry Bush Kerry Bush Kerry Bush Kerry Bush

Avg
50.2 44.8 53.7 45.9 53.2 45.8 50.1 49.5

CO 47 48 50.3 49.1 50.1 48.6 47.4 52.1
FL 50 47 51.9 47.6 50.9 48.3 47.3 52.3
IA 50 44 54.2 45.4 50.7 48.4 49.5 50.1
ME 50 39 57.6 41.5 55.5 42.7 54.1 45.1
MI 52 45 53.9 45.6 54.4 44.7 51.5 48.0

MN 52 44 54.5 44.8 55.7 43.0 51.5 47.9
OH 50 47 52.3 47.8 54.2 45.4 48.9 51.1
PA 50 45 53.8 46.3 55.3 44.0 51.3 48.7
WI 51 44 54.3 45.1 52.0 47.0 49.9 49.6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unsupported contention?
If Hillary is winning only because Obama and Edwards split the true progressive vote (why would be another issue - the policy differences of either from hers are not that great, but I digress) then why do they all do, taken in total, about the same in head to head matchups against leading Republicans? In fact HRC is far from the worst in that area, where any splitting should show up? If Edwards or Obama could do much better in such matchups why don't polls where Hillary is not an issue show this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Respectfully
TIA's methodology is affected by the fact that he uses deductive logic rather than inductive logic... He starts with a inference and then forces the evidence to fit his inference instead of collecting the evidence and then forming a inference from the evidence...Respectfully, it's sloppy social science or value laden social science and would get you laughed out of any graduate level social science research course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC