Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Edwards on President Bush's Remarks on Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:20 PM
Original message
Senator Edwards on President Bush's Remarks on Iran
Senator Edwards on President Bush's Remarks on Iran

12/04/2007 at 12:14 PM EST

Today, Senator John Edwards released the following statement:

"Just a couple of months ago, George Bush was telling us Iran was about to start World War III. Today - even after his own government just said that Iran stopped its program in 2003 and is no longer pursuing nuclear weapons - Bush still refuses to back down from his outrageous rhetoric.

"Enough is enough. At long last, the spin and the saber-rattling must stop. We must once and for all reject the failed, bellicose, neoconservative foreign policy of the Bush Administration, and get back to the foreign policy I have proposed based on diplomacy, reengagement, and restoring the moral authority of America."
http://blog.johnedwards.com/story/2007/12/4/121436/442
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Short, sweet, and 100% accurate.
Bush just needs to give it up. Crawford is waiting for him. Go home early, George. Do us and the rest of the world a favor and just go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. That and
Biden saying if they attack Iran Bush would face impeachment.

Meanwhile the press is almost whining for their drumbeat campaign that just fizzled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Will somebody..anybody, Please
call the men in the white coats and get this jerk-off outta here. If we had a Free Press instead of m$$$$m do you think this would be allowed to stand?

I can only imagine the restraint that a man like John Edwards has to use when they are so close to all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't understand why Edwards isn't at the front of the pack in
the polls. He is clearly ahead of the other candidates with regard to addressing the issues that face most Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The "insane" are running the Insane Asylum. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He is ,the media doesn't want it
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 02:49 PM by Rambis
newspapers sell better if Obama and Hillary are assailing each other. It makes for better tv too.
Ho hum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That is a question for the corporate media.
They will only push the candidates that serve their interests. Just a Howard Dean was destroyed in '04, so is Edwards being ignored on '08.

After reading Assault on Reason, I understand why Gore will not run (and I really wanted him to run). He controls the climate change issue right now. CMC has to go TO him to get an expert opinion.

In a campaign, any candidate has to go to CMC. CMC can distort and fabricate the policies or decide 'earth tones' aren't fashionable or a 'scream' is a sign of unelectabilty. Edwards is not being controlled by CMC so he gets no face time and his message is not talked about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Do you think that the media will succeed in smashing his run for
the Presidency or will he somehow prevail? And would the American people have enough sense to recognize his capabilities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, sadly, I do believe CMC will
destroy his candidacy. One of the most important lessons I learned in '04 was what happen to Howard Dean. I was/am a true Deaniac. His spontaneity and willingness to answer questions w/o parsing every word sold me early on. After 'the scream', 'electability' became the CMC's buzzword - overnight it seemed. Observing what happened, I said to myself....'Now, I get it'....no matter how much you want to believe that 'the people' have a voice and that voice will prevail, if CMC isn't on board, it will not happen. Because of this realization, I only work for local progressive candidates now. I contribute sparingly to national presidential campaigns. I have sent Edwards $$$$ & am a DNC 'Bond' contributor (because I believe in what Dean is doing.)But no money to DCCC or DSCC (I contribute to Boxer directly) - none of that money EVER comes back to this district.

I knew Kerry would not be elected. I hoped that * would be booted. But I watched the CMC. The race was always close - a toss-up - the poll numbers close...the suspense building. It had to be that way in order for the neo-cons to steal it again. I was fearful that w/ the recall of Davis and installation of steroid boy, as well as the smear campaign against then SoS Kevin Shelly(D) (his resignation & installation of a publican SoS) the plan was to steal California. But right before election day, I figured it would be stolen in either Pennsylvania or Ohio, as strange doings were being reported in both states.

What happened to Howard Dean's campaign opened my eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I can't argue with your good logic. I think you have figured the
system out.

I'm not joking when I suggest that something, (and I have no idea what) is decreasing the average Amer ian's IQ. And it that is the case, it might be the answer to why we Americans seemed so hell bent on self-destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well-spoken
I applaud him for his strong words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Absolutely correct!
Nicely said Senator!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC