Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEW Ohio Poll -The Huckster 44% Obama 41% Hillary 47% The Huckster 45%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:17 PM
Original message
NEW Ohio Poll -The Huckster 44% Obama 41% Hillary 47% The Huckster 45%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not good news. Both Clinton and Obama lose to Rudy and McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. In Ohio? How embarrassing for Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. No, Clinton 48%, Ghouliani 44%
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 04:22 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
McCain, the eventual nominee, is trouble, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. D'oh! How did I of all people miss that!
McCain's campaign simply will not die because he still outperforms the GOP in matchups with the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. No-Clinton Beats The Ghoul
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 04:23 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
But he's not getting the nomination...

It's either the Huckster or Mittens or McCain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Frankly, I don't think much of these hypothetical match-ups.
Too far out in advance for any real data to be gathered. People aren't paying attention to the general election yet, and I seriously doubt that McCain would be still twitching in a one-on-one against any Democrat with a pulse. I don't think the other numbers are any more credible, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think we should call him Huckleberry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Huckleberry Pyle has a nice ring
Why am I not surprised that OH goes for Huck?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Great video DSB
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. That's an insult to cute cartoon dogs AND jams and pies Ronny...I can't
support ya on this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. So Obama loses to Gomer Pyle in the one state we absolutely need.
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 04:20 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
But he's the most electable. This is all name recognition... oh wait, nobody's heard of Huckabee.

Hmmm... let me get back to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Huckabee could carry all the red states
That's a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Exactly
But so could most of the Republicans... But the Democrats have a better chance of "stealing" a red state than the Republicans have of holding every red one, imho...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. We could win big if Giuliani or Romney get the nomination
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 04:30 PM by sampsonblk
A lot of states are in play with those two.

But if Huckabee gets the nomination, then we're back to fighting for Florida and Ohio again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. I Think Even With The "Right " Or "Wrong" GOOPER Candidate Depending On Your Definition
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 04:53 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
We can put New Mexico,Arkansas, Colorado, Arizona, Virginia, Ohio, and Florida in play... That doesn't mean we will them...

Obviously Arizona and Arkansas are off the table if the nominee is McCain or The Huckster...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. A MOE differential in a state he has barely visited
Yep. It's over. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. How Many Times Has The Huckster Visited There?
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 04:26 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Who knows? And why should we care about state polls where no one is campaiging
one year out from the election?

I don't even use that argument against Hillary.

Favorable/unfavorable ratings for individuals are more significant at this point, IMO, than candidate-to-candidate differentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Here's A Link To Dozens And Dozens Of State Polls
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 04:49 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
What red state does Obama put in play beside Iowa with its seven electoral votes*?

http://www.surveyusa.com/electionpolls.aspx

Respectfully and sincerely ,I'm not trying to be punative or combative...My raison d'etre is to see Democrats elected... The fact that Obama doesn't put any red states in play beside Iowa is troubling... If I want to support a candidate out of vanity I'll write in my own name..


*Kerry lost Iowa by a whopping 7,000 votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. It's a reasonable concern
but Obama is still a mystery to many people. The fact that he's doing well in the red state that knows him best should provide some reassurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I'll Be The First To Admit I Could I Be Wrong
But I look at the data and get concerned, no matter how early it is in the process... The data and historical precedent has to make anybody concerned...

And I see somebody up thread dismissing John McCain as a joke... I assure you Joe Sixpack doesn't think John McCain is a joke...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. That's why I look at favorables
McCain has been around forever and his unfavorables never get out of the low 30's...that's remarkably strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Somebody Upthread Said He's A Joke
It doesn't matter if DU think he's a joke... I doubt you will convince a plurality or majority of Americans he's a joke...

This election could be a repeat of 1972... Richard Nixon effectively neutralized Viet Nam as an issue by starting to bring troops homes under his Vietnamization plan...He certainly bought himself a lot of time... He effectively sold himself as the candidate who would bring "peace with honor" and successfully defined his opponent as someone who wanted "peace at any cost"... I think Bush* might have done the same thing for his party's candidate with the surge...Again, it doesn't matter what you or I think, Americans don't like to lose a war and the media is portraying the surge as a success...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Huckabee is one of the few GOPers who could win this thing
His message is resonating with GOPers who hear it. He's getting 2/3 of the white evangelicals in Iowa. That should be a cause for concern on our side. As long as the RW is divided, we should win easily. Huckabee is uniting them. And if he wins in Iowa, he's going to have the money to really get his message out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. yes, many knew this awhile back
and spent time trying to stop Ghouliani, Mittenführer, when Huckabee is the real enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I saw him on the Daily Show, but didn't know he'd catch steam
The guy is good. Romney and Giuliani are in big trouble, whether they know it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. He's been the one I've feared since the beginning...
People will be charmed by his "niceness" and overlook everything else, especially in such a mean campaign season. Personally, I think we'd be better off with one of our own "nice guys," Biden or Edwards, than Clinton and Obama who are seen more and more as getting down in the mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Some news stories about his ability to mesmerize ala Jim Jones
He is a smooth talker. Does have that glazed look in his eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. Huckster has yet to receive the full intensity of the media spotlight -
once the dirt starts coming out on this guy, he'll start to slip in the polls the way Rotten Rudy is right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Not true if the boys in charge of MSM want him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Exactly
See Gore v Bush*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. The dirt was there on Bush in 2000...too many idiots just refused to believe it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'm not terribly worried about Huckabee, if
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 05:05 PM by Occam Bandage
Obama's the nominee. He's 23% retail tax idea will not play well. People do not like enormous changes. Saying "I will replace your income tax with a retail tax that should do the same thing" is an enormous change. Liberals do not like the idea of regressive taxes. Many conservatives, when you get down to it, will not trust the government to create an entirely new tax system that works "just as well."

Add that to his outright denial of evolution, and I think we can paint him pretty easily as a crazy right-wing extremist. The only problem with Huckabee is his damn voice. He's got that Bill Clinton thing going (I swear, somewhere in Hope is the greatest voice coach in history), mixed with preacher charm. People will want to like him, and I worry we'll allow charisma to become an actual issue. If people get it in their heads that "who you like more" is more important than their healthcare, I think he'd mop the floor with Hillary.

Edwards? Tough fight. They're both populists, they're both charismatic, they're both Really Really Sincere white guys. I'd give JE the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Edwards is the one of the three that can beat any republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. This is a MUST read article about that kook Huckabee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh yeah, we got ourselves some serious values-voters around here.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUniverse Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. The bad news here is that about 45 percent of the country would vote for a man who...
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 06:04 PM by TheUniverse
believes the world is 6000 years old, thinks evolution is a tool of satan, and doesnt even support abortion rights, not even in the first of month in cases of rape. This is a shame for our country.

Dont believe me. Here it is his words.


Q: South Dakota had some proposed legislation to outlaw all abortion except saving the life of a mother, no exceptions for rape or incest. You said you'd sign that. Why?

A: I always am going to err on the side of life. I believe life is precious. I hav been in the pro-life camp since I was a teenager. It's because of my view that God is the creator and instigator of life. But those of us in the pro-life movement have to do also some expanding. Life begins at conception but it doesn't end at birth. And if we're really pro-life we have to be concerned about more than just the gestation period. passed pro-life legislation, but we also did things that improved the environmental quality that would affect a child's air and water; that he had a better education, & better access to affordable health care. So I think that real pro-life people need to be concerned about affordable housing, safe neighborhoods, access to a college education. That, for me, is what pro-life has to mean.
Source: Meet the Press: Meet the Candidates 2008 series Jan 28, 2007


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC