Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid's son Rory is chairman of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in Nevada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:02 AM
Original message
Harry Reid's son Rory is chairman of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in Nevada
You might wonder why Harry Reid changed the time for the vote on the Kyl/Lieberman amendment so that Barack Obama, who was waiting to vote on the bill, was told the time was suddenly changed. Then, after Obama left, the votes were cast 40 minutes later.

There is an Energy bill coming up this Saturday (why on a Saturday?) that allows Obama a small window of time to vote on due to events scheduled in Des Moines, Iowa with Oprah Winfrey. Reid scheduled the vote on Saturday for one simple reason... to help out his boy who is running the Clinton campaign in Nevada. If Obama has to leave to fly into bad weather in Iowa, it sure makes Hillary look good...doesn't it...

When Rory Reid told his father, U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, that he would be chairman of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in Nevada, the elder Reid felt a minor political headache coming on.

http://politics.lasvegassun.com/2007/02/marriage_of_con.html








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. You mean people are unaware of this?
Or Reids insistence on towing the "centrists" line, to the detriment of congressional approval ratings?

Yeah, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I want people to see the obvious connection with Harry Reid's schedule and his son's link to Hillary
Like you said about the apple...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good move.
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 12:17 AM by ClarkUSA
I stopped donating to the DSCC and DCCC because of the pro-Clintonian politics in both organizations (remember Bill's birthday wish for Hillary in a DCCC
fundraising appeal?). And now this Reid crap again. Fuck him and Rory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. 98 Senators were not "surprised" by the vote. OP is Complete Fiction.
Gossip based on entries from the ObamaGirlsBlogs aren't facts, no matter how many times ObamaNation spams DU with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. amen
The audacity in ignoring reality of some Obama supporters is astounding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
52. Fiction = anything that disparages Hillary's insider connections
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 11:20 AM by Capn Sunshine
we can't be speaking truth to power, when winning is everything, especially in small towns in New England
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. What is Obama's occupation?
Well, what is he supposed to be doing with the six figure salary Illinois taxpayers give him? The notion that Obama is an outsider is at best a stretch. He is a senator. He is beloved by the media. He has numerous endorsements from establishment figures. He has a lot of support from corporate interests. In what way is he an outsider?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Uh... Yeah, I was unaware of this! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. LOL!
He looks just like his dad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. That freakin' sucks!
The vile kyl-lieman bill cooked up for the bushites and ol' hillary couldn't wait to "YAY".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. It was really 40 minutes?
That's such bullshit. This Saturday vote is obviously more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah, it's too bad there's not like three day's warning or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Nice they finally found a scapegoat, huh?....
Man, you guys are really ready to find excuses for this guy for everything...that's scary. Bush people are still finding excuses for him too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Some Senators running for President can't fill up a Denny's for a rally
No wonder it's nice hanging out in DC on Harry's time. Rory is a very happy boy.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
55. not every candidate has the media and corporate support that Obama has...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. That's a joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wow. That's really slimy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
63. You think that's slimy-
Just talk to some of the Edwards volunteers in Reno, you'll find out exactly how slimy the DLC, and all of their chums are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wow.
Thanks for starting this thread, Zulch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's pretty sickening...
I knew about it before, but it's pretty damn obvious what the Reids are up to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. There's zero evidence that this had anything to do with the vote being switched
besides, all the other senators were able to make it. And wasn't Obama's excuse (or at least the excuse of his supporters on DU) on the day of the vote that he wasn't feeling well or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. Obama should stay and vote -- period. No excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Even when he is told there won't be a vote anytime soon?
Yes, that is reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. After all, it would make Harry's boy very happy if he missed his campaign appointments
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 07:44 AM by zulchzulu
Maybe you live a life where a schedule is sort of optional, but when you are running for President and THOUSANDS of people want to see you speak, you can't be waiting around for some flunkie like Reid paying out for his boy to screw up the schedule.

Add that Hillary, who Reid's son is working for, could never get the rallies Obama is getting. Oh, wait, unless Bill is there. He might be too busy chasing skirt in Spain though.

Reid is an ass and so is his son for playing this game. Can Harry have the votes on normal working hours?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
37. It's not like he's never missed a vote before. C'mon. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanielleClarke Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. and you have the Obama family name? DUNHAM?
Yes Barack will vote don't worry he won't shame your family name DUNHAM and if Barack does miss a vote its because he always makes sure his vote isn't needed to break a te or make sure a bill passes.

http://www.wargs.com/political/obama.html

Ancestry of Barack Obama


compiled by William Addams Reitwiesner



The following material on the immediate ancestry of Barack Obama should not be considered either exhaustive or authoritative, but rather as a first draft.

Christopher Challender Child and Robert Battle contributed to this report. In addition, corrections were provided by Joe David Bellamy, Judy Barry Strangfeld, Gratia Dunham Mahoney, Fred Chalfant, P. J. Evans, James Quinn, and James R. Kuttler.

ETC
ETC
ETC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is sick..........YUK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. All's fair in love and war.
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 07:48 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanielleClarke Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. Time for Reid to goooooooo
Its shameless and will backfire. People are not dumb thanks to people Like Obama who wants to keep the internet free of control and wants to put washington DC on google.

""Obama on Ethics and Lobbying Reform""
http://obama.senate.gov/issues/ethics_and_lobbying_reform/

Throughout his political career, Barack Obama has fought for open and honest government. As an Illinois State Senator, he helped pass the state’s first major ethics reform bill in 25 years. And as a U.S. Senator, he has spearheaded the effort to clean up Washington in the wake of numerous scandals.

In the first two weeks of the 110th Congress, Senator Obama helped lead the Senate to pass the Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act, a comprehensive ethics and lobbying reform bill, by a 96-2 vote. This landmark bill was signed into law by the President in September 2007.
PART OF ARTICLE INCLUDED

""Alone among the U.S. Presidential candidates"", Barack Obama is confronting the question of how to produce more accountable and effective politics in our democracy.

His just-released Tech Plan (Download Obama Tech Plan) uniquely understands that the time, expertise and enthusiasm that ordinary people invest in making Wikipedia better, for example, can be transformed into practices to make government work better and more accountably. So he doesn't just call for making information more transparent to citizens; he wants to hear what we have to say and enable us to participate. The Plan calls for citizen engagement in the work of federal agencies and demonstrates respect for the intelligence and expertise of the American people. He calls for opening up the closed practices of government and using new technology to enable genuine citizen participation and engagement in our democracy. This is a major and unprecedented step.
No other candidate “gets it.” They pay lip service to transparency. He proposes making government data available online as well as ensuring that agencies do their work in public. They talk about citizen congresses that would deliberate in quaint town hall meetings having nothing to do with real world politics or power.
He proposes engaging citizens in the actual and ongoing work and decision-making of government -- not Americans talking to elected officials but Americans genuinely participating. They talk about technology and innovation. He offers a comprehensive broadband strategy, commitment to media diversity, and a proposal to improve patent quality, including the practice of rigorous, public peer review like Peer-to-Patent. They talk about strong IP. He balances his support of strong IP with recognition of the need to promote collaboration and innovation.
I am excited about Obama’s Tech Plan. In fact, it should be called the “Democracy Plan.” He alone does what a President should do, namely articulate a vision for democracy in the digital age.

CLICK LINK TO SEE WHAT He wants to DO: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/danielleclarke/Cx84
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
22. What complete nonsense. A 'conspiracy' to keep Obama from voting 'No'?
This silly pipe dream belongs in the Humor Forum, not GD-P
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. zulchzulu has returned from the Twilight Zone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
25. See, this is another reason why I love this guy
There's plenty of evidence Obama got screwed on the K/L vote, but he hasn't said one word about it, even called his missing the vote "my mistake." Remininscent of his "I don't know how I would have voted" line about IWR in response to a question from Russert on what made him so much smarter than his Senate colleagues. Obama's never going to whine, and he's never going to make people look bad.

Now here we go again, with Reid's pro-Clinton son inevitably coloring any move he makes that inconveniences Obama, and a very curiously-timed Saturday vote. This time it's a little different in that many people are saying WTF? and pointing to the confusion on K/L as a precedent.

Hopefully, someone in the media picks up this story and grills Reid. He'll have good answers, no doubt, and Obama will play along. But it should put Reid on notice that, going forward, anything that smacks of partisanship on his end will be scrutinized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Where is the evidence? Please share it.
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 09:26 AM by Skip Intro

Please show me evidence that Obama got screwed on the K/L vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Posted innumerable times previously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. You link to an Obama Blog as your only "evidence"?
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 09:42 AM by MethuenProgressive
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. You mean this?
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

Mr. REID. Mr. Chairman, there will be no more votes tonight. We have tried to work something out on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment and the Biden amendment. We have been unable to do that.

We have been very close a few times, but we have just been informed that Senator Biden will not have a vote anytime in the near future. There will not be a vote on the other one anytime in the near future. We hope tonight will bring more clearness on the issue.

But right now, I think it is fair to say there will be no votes tonight.

Does the Senator from South Dakota have any comments?

Mr. THUNE. No, I do not. I would say to the leader, that is good for our Members to know. We have Members who have been inquiring whether they will be able to vote.
--------------------------------------

That looks like it could mean several things. Saying "its fair to say there will be no votes tonight" makes it seem that there could be votes in the near future. He is also speaking about the Biden amendment, so it's not entirely clear what Harry Reid is saying. But did Biden show the next day? Did Hillary? Did Dodd? Surely they had some campaigning to do too, but they were there. To believe that this was intentionally orchestrated to screw Obama out of a vote, which is what you said, one would have to leave rationality at the door.


And of course, with a staff of what, 40, surely someone was charged with keeping up with when votes were going to be held. That's just common sense.

But you said there was plenty of evidence Obama was screwed out of the vote. Is this it? Is this the plenty of evidence? Is there further evidence? Because this alone just doesn't hold up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. 98 Senators thought it important enough to know when the vorte would be.
With some more experience, perhaps even BO will learn how to find out when votes we be held.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. That would seem to be evidence that Senators had ample notice of the vote, eh?
I mean, talk about connecting the dots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. (They were all in on the plot to keep BO from voting)
(BO is so hated by all those jealous Senators that not a single one tipped him there were pingpong balls in his locker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. What percentage of votes has Obama skipped this year?
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 09:55 AM by Progress And Change
Is that Harry Reid's fault too? Or is Obama more interested in his lust for power than doing what he is paid big money by hard-working Illinois residents to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. Not posting for you or the other anti-Obama spammers on this thread
Funny things happen in politics...the young Senator is soaring above his older colleagues and the Majority leader's son works for the frontrunner. Think they'd ever want to cook up some old fashioned comeuppance? Stranger things have happened in life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. I guess this is what you get when you ask some Obama supporters to back up their assertions.
You said there was plenty of evidence that Obama got screwed out of the K/L vote. I asked for it, and you gave me something short of it. There must be more evidence, if there is "plenty." Why not shut me up with facts if you have them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. "There will not be a vote on the other one anytime in the near future."
Plus you have the assertion made in the OP; can't find a link on that, but, as an Obama supporter, it would be naive and irresponsible not to be a little suspicious of the establishment's capacity and desire to make the newbie look bad.

The best part is, none of this matters as Obama is starting to win anyway. If you think voters in Iowa are going to chanting "he missed Kyl/Lieberman!" on caucus night, when the alternative is to select someone who actually voted for it, knock yourself out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Which party is Harry Reid a member of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Who does his son work for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Is Reid a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Who does his son work for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #49
56. Reid hates his (part-time...) co-worker so much he would risk Democratic defeat in 08'?
In order to believe the desperate theory concocted by Obama's faithful supporters, in whose eyes he can do no wrong, you have to believe that Reid is so opposed to Obama that he would risk Democrats losing the 2008 election if Obama is the nominee (if we nominate Obama we will definitely here about his lack of audacity in taking stands...) all so he can reduce Obama's chances of winning the nomination. Umm, okay... Obama has a consistent record of dodging politically difficult votes. Kyl-Lieberman is just another in a long list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. Obama was duped just lie Sen Widestance was
He was given a "implied promise" that could not possibly be kept. Sen Widestance was told that his arrest and conviction would be kept quiet even though no one could garauntee that. Obama was told there would be no vote that evening, though no one could garauntee that.

And Obama believed it!! Maybe with some more experience, he'll learn that votes can happen at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. That's the same thing you just posted, out of context as well. But
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 10:23 AM by Skip Intro
I understand, this isn't the first time I've asked an Obama suporter to back up his/her words with facts and have gotten spin instead.

And I surely understand suspicion, but the fact that 98 Senators, some of whom had campaigning to do too, showed up would mean this would have to have been a vast and wide conspiracy to keep Obama out of the vote. That is really reaching, and considering Obama's short voting record, probably ignoring the obvious, that he decided not to show for the vote.

And it's not so much that he missed the vote, though it would be nice to have a candidate who actually put some action behind his words, it's the audacity he displays when he sees fit to criticize a fellow candidate for her vote when he didn't bother to show up. Further, he had already stated that he was for designating that part of the Iranian military as "terrorists." It's the hyporcisy and the arrogance that really get me with this guy. And the default defense of, "it's somebody else's fault" you hear time and time again from some of his supporters, as if Obama is above being held accountable for his words and acitons, or lack thereof. Damn, we're trying to rid the WH of someone with those triats now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. IRG designation: Not the issue for Obama
K/L links force structuring in Iraq to Iran and could give cover to Bush to go to war with Iran; Clinton says she disagrees with that interpretation. This is why Biden and Dodd also opposed it. Obama's position is spelled out in this op-ed piece:

http://www.unionleader.com/pda-article.aspx?articleId=a41d44e5-0c56-4353-b9f6-5eda09c81236
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Hate to do this do you, but this is a case of Obama vs Obama - in his own words:
From your link, on his problem with the bill he didn't vote on:

The amendment, offered by Sens. Joe Lieberman and Jon Kyl, directly links the ongoing war in Iraq -- including our troop presence -- to checking the threat from Iran. The amendment opens with 17 findings that highlight Iranian influence within Iraq. It then states that we have to "transition(s) and structure" our "military presence in Iraq" to counter the threat from Iran, and states that it is "a critical national interest of the United States" to prevent the Iranian government from exerting influence inside Iraq.
------------------

and from his own website, a year ago:

A reduced but active presence will also send a clear message to hostile countries like Iran and Syria that we intend to remain a key player in this region…Make no mistake, if the Iranians and Syrians think they can use Iraq as another Afghanistan or a staging area from which to attack Israel or other countries, they are badly mistaken. It is in our national interest to prevent this from happening.

http://www.barackobama.com/2006/11/20/a_way_forward_in_iraq.php
------------------


Will the real Obama please stand up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Consistent on opposing IRG's regional role, consistent on opposing BushCo's adventurism
If Obama says as President he will take steps to use U.S. forces to oppose terrorism in the Middle East, why does that mean he should automatically sign on to legislation that entrusts Bush with the same authority? Especially legislation that he, Biden and Dodd all say can be used to justify war with Iran. He doesn't trust giving Bush expanded powers, Clinton repeatedly does. Therein lies the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. typical double talk from Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. are you serious?
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
61. BG, he was in Maine that evening when the vote was originally scheduled.
He had no idea Hillary was gonna vote yes on that bill.

Think about it. The debate was the very next evening. Why would Reid give Hillary "cover" by sending her to the wolves with a fresh vote in the newscycle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. One of Jeb Bush's sons is supporting Guiliani, but another son is
supporting Thompson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. ROFL! The vast HRC conspiracy strkes again! Why is it always someone else's fault when the O flaters
Sounds like someone else we know.


btw, CNN reported that Obama, and all Senators, had ample notice of the vote.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/2/222754/291


Gee, I hope Hillary doesn't make it rain on Obama's next campaign rally.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. "CNN reported that Obama, and all Senators, had ample notice of the vote"
CNN v some paid Obamatron's blog? We all know which ObamaNation'll believe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. From that article, "2 Democratic Senate sources tell CNN"
Interesting that they don't mention which two CNN sources.

I think this link summarizes it much better.

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2007/10/14/02149/153/336#c336

And by the way, Obama himself said that it was a mistake.

I do agree that this new story is being a little overblown by my fellow Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. My sources tell me 98 senators voted on it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
58. Oh, still with this "poor little Obama didn't get enough notice
on this vote from meanie Reid" B.S.???? Who believes this drivel, but his more fervent fans? How come everybody else had plenty of notice? Did the other senators (specially Biden and Dodd) have a Reid son working for them too????

Please.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
60. Was Obama even at the debate for the bill that evening? His campaign shedule says he was in Maine.
Why was he in Maine instead of DC for the bill's debate the evening when the vote was supposed to happen?

Because he didn't give a flying fig about the vote (its passage was assured) and had no clue that Hillary was gonna vote yes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. He had no intent on voting on it. The 'Harry Reid stole my homework' story is BS from BO.
It turned out to be 'big', and that's when he became interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 10th 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC