|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:16 PM Original message |
Hey, Iowa and New Hampshire! Read this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. Call in an 8 year old genius to decode this because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Read it, what's the point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. well, actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. *snark* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. You're right, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. With the 24/7 news cycle and the internets and the compressed calendar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. Is it fair to say that either the campaigns have missed this or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. the point being... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I thought Nevada was a caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. sorry! I meant Arizona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Those sunny, dry states.....easy to get switched around! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. My theory, based on reports earlier this year that California's would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Why not just move up the primary then? That's effectivly what early reporting of absentee ballots is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I dunno. Maybe this was a way to move up the primary without doing it officially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Whatever works. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. This information got around Iowa back in May or June |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. damn, things are getting desparate in Hillaryland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. this didn't come from the Hillary campaign, but Obamanation, as usual, has a knee-jerk reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
18. You know, this really sounds like a slam to Iowa and NH, and they've done nothing to deserve it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Iowa and New Hampshire were aware of this six months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. psst! Follow the little linky after the text then tell me whose campaign this came from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
22. Does the Clinton camp view Iowa and New Hampshire voters as being smug? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Fri Dec-07-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. That's what hot toddy's are for! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC