|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:31 PM Original message |
Explain to the rest of the world: How can you vote for a candidate who supported the Iraq War? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. They were lied to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. No, they voted for the War because they feared their political careers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. You do understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. The question is: can you trust somebody who voted for the Iraq War in the White House? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. Actually, the alternative is far, far ,far worse. You can never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. My thread is about the primaries. And K/R, is that the vote to name the Iranian National Guard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. You're not reading. I didn't say K/L wasn't wrong and stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. I didn't say you didn't say... Well, you get the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #27 |
126. I can vote for Edwards because he apologized and vowed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:45 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. DING DING DING ... we have a winner folks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
44. Actually, what is more important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. I agree that the war on terror is largely a manufactured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. They voted for the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. A vote for the IWR was a vote for War. They knew that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. My argument presents a plausible alternative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I don't buy that for a second. They were warned by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
64. That's their defense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
108. All of these Democrats were "Lied to", and yet.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #108 |
112. That picture is very telling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
137. You want a President dumb enough to be fooled by George Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. I don't have to explain. I support Gore - and am still waiting. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like he's planning to run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justyce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. And Obama voted to fund it - might as well throw him in that group too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Yes, that's true. But for now, I want to focus on these 4, who voted for the War to begin with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
48. Too bad you don't control the discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Who said I wanted to "control the discussion"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Your question "How can you vote for a candidate who supported the Iraq War?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Maybe you should read the post instead of just the headline. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #67 |
81. I did. You criticize Edwards, not for the IWR vote, but for his statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. Again: a lie from you. I criticized all of them for the IWR vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #85 |
98. Your words "we remember him for making statements connecting Hussein to Al Qu'aida and 9/11, " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #98 |
113. "Not just his IWR vote". So you admit I did criticize him for his IWR vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. Bullshit. We're talking about who was against from the beginning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
63. Bullshit. Read the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. No, that's only the headline. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #70 |
82. No, it's the entire OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #82 |
88. Now that we have established you can't read... what shall we talk about next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #88 |
101. Once your posts are deleted, we will have established |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #101 |
115. Oh, please, where is this supposed name-calling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
41. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Thank you. This information is very valuable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
69. Let me be clear when I state that there were various degrees of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. I agree...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. My friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
32. There is no reason to think that he wouldn't have gotten support from these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. you misunderstood the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. We just disagree on this issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
53. The IWR was to be used to "legitimize" Bush's War plans....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #53 |
73. But (a short follow up) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #73 |
90. That's what the Levin amendment was for....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #90 |
105. I think the honest question there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
12. I was against Iraq and even Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. I wouldn't call mourning over 1 million dead innocent people "whining". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Your thread isn't mourning anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. reread your own posts. you are no stranger to utmost jerkiness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I'm a jerk for thinking one million innocent deaths are important to discuss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Thanks DutchLiberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
56. No, youre' a jerk for ignoring the millions of sick people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Why do they have to be mutually exclusive? And why are you changing the subject? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. You made them mutually exclusive, not me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. No, I did not say that. Again, you're putting words in my mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #72 |
84. You certainly did imply it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. No, I did not. And yes, I recommend you actually read the question I asked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
griffi94 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. nobody gets it right all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I guess good judgement isn't required for presidents anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
17. That's a question I've been asking for months; especially concerning Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. However, funding the troops is what keeps the war going. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
37. If it was up to Obama and Kucinich there would have never been a war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. But when Obama was recently asked what he had done if he had been in the position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #50 |
110. I don't give a shit what Bush says, and you seem to have left Obama's reasoning for his comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #110 |
116. Huh? It's not about what Bush says, it's about "supporting the troops" being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
52. falling into a trap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. For one thing, they were lied to, although to me that is not as acceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Anybody paying attention did know or could have known the truth about Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #24 |
57. anbody paying attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
66. No one yet has given a good reason to vote for any Dem who voted for the IWR and I hope to God our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
23. I supported Kerry after he was nominated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
45. We the people are fucked but really, has there ever been a more deserving lot to be fucked as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. The question is how can anyone vote for someone who wants to bomb IRAN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. But it was HRC who voted to label Iran's National Guard a 'terrorist organization'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. and Obama who first suggested it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
59. Did Obama vote for K/R, yes or no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #59 |
71. nope, he felt so strongly about it he skipped out on the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. So, Obama did not vote for it, but HRC did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. My, my. you really do need some educating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #40 |
61. You can drop the insulting condescending tone. Like I said: I know the difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #61 |
95. then stop conflating them intentionallly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #95 |
118. You're the one who is judgmental, by saying I need "some educating". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #61 |
107. Honestly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #107 |
119. Thank you. Now that was a real insightful contribution to this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
38. I Talked About This In Another Post... My Take Is This... I Don't Think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #38 |
65. Yes, I believe all that is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
47. 18,000 people die EVERY YEAR because they lack health insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #47 |
75. I did not say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #47 |
102. and you kill some brain cells every time you hit 'post' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
49. Because what's done is done. We need to bring our troops home as soon as possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
78. "What's done is done?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #78 |
93. The war wasn't the fault of anyone but Bush and the neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:17 PM Response to Reply #93 |
120. And the Democrats who supported and -worse!- advocated the War are complicit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #49 |
83. "because what's done is done." ?????? How neato, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #83 |
94. Because the war can't be blamed on anyone but Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #94 |
100. Maybe you can't blame the war on Bush....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #100 |
114. No, I do blame the war on Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #94 |
103. Ahh...revisionist history! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
55. "Butt out, rest of the world." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #55 |
79. Hillary-supporters can never really defend their candidate, now can they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
60. Explain to the world how you won't nominate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
77. Depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #60 |
80. Why don't you just answer the question instead of talking silly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #80 |
86. Talking silly????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. Erm... no. I asked you to explain to us why you would vote for somebody who supported the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. That is an inaccurate statement...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #96 |
121. Yes, but at least they're not deliberately turning my words in my OP around, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
76. I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
87. I support John Edwards, and you can't stop me :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Who said I wanted? I'm asking you a question. Too painful to answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #92 |
97. man, you really are full of it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #97 |
122. How eloquent of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. The IWR doesn't bother me. Should it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #99 |
106. are you not at all concerned that Edwards could again make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #106 |
111. I trust he "learned" from that mistake, and was strongly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #99 |
123. I think it should. I think it shows really bad judgment. And he was *very* pro-war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #92 |
109. You wanted me to expand on the subject? Well here it is: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #109 |
117. Nicely stated. Some of these anti-war zealots sometimes forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #117 |
125. "Anti-war zealots"? Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. No need to, I get all the O'Reilly talking points here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. Stop pretending I attack people because they support somebody I don't like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #109 |
124. Well, here is my answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 06:38 PM Response to Reply #124 |
133. It is not a rant and, for the record, I despise the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
104. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
127. For the same reason I could see voting for a candidate who panders to homophobes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSdemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
129. Honestly, I'm just not an issue-based voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
132. In 2004 we had to cast those votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
134. Voting for IWR and supporting Bush's ultimate DECISION to invade are two different matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
135. That's exactly why I and many others here support Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
136. Your question is so legitimate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC