|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:04 PM Original message |
Oprah No Match For Bill: CBS Poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Keep the Lie alive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. O +O = O |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
72. Actually... O + O = -13...according to this poll...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. what lie is that? link? proof of your assertion? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:46 AM Response to Reply #13 |
52. Are you delusional? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. If not for hubby Bill, Hillary wouldn't even be a NY Senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. I believe the voters of NY had a say in the matter. Twice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:17 AM Response to Reply #14 |
55. If not for Bill NY would never have had a say in said matter. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:09 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Hark, a cyberspace echo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. And you know that how? Oh wait..just talking points shat from ass.....once again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. They use their special "way back alternate dimension machine" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Its not talking points from the ass, anybody who thinks she would have been a NY senator... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. So because she married Bill, its unfair or something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Nope, didnt say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Riiiiight Mr Misogynist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Describe how that is Misogyny? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Look in a mirror..............Become Enlightened.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. NO! You called me a mysoginist, tell me how what I said is mysoginistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:58 AM Response to Reply #34 |
63. it's best to ignore him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #34 |
66. I'll tell you. In post 19, you agreed with the misogynist remark by poster #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #66 |
80. Hubby is short for Husband...your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. Empty Rhetoric, how typical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #2 |
37. If it weren't for secret vote counting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. spooky! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
65. If not for pure luck, Obama wouldn't have backed into his Senate seat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:12 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Here's to scandals and hubbys! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KennedyGuy
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. poor little obababots..your big Oprah moment is over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:13 AM Response to Reply #4 |
50. Not even a little car. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yeah, yeah... Oprahpalooza was a success. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. interesting. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I can vouch for the poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Don't doubt it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Added to the OP...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. 10 Q. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. Oprah makes 14% of Dems less likely to vote for Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. lol, a little surprising to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Visit Oprah.com and read her fan board. They are not a bunch of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Must be the rebellious faction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:16 AM Response to Reply #11 |
39. I was talking to a co worker today who happens to be black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #39 |
46. I have a close friend at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:10 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. I too was surprised by my co worker's comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
21. I would hope a former President carrioes more weight than a talk-show host |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. have to agree nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
27. Of course, it's a poll...that's all Clinton's team uses are polls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fdonagaugh
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. Unfortunately, neither Hillary nor Obama come even close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yeah, especially with the help of those Clintonian swift boating madrassa emails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. It's all the Clinton's fault! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. that was my guess too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:37 AM Response to Reply #30 |
51. I'm sure it isn't a coincidence that several Clinton regional directors were sending the same email. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:03 AM Response to Reply #51 |
64. I am, especially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:23 AM Response to Reply #29 |
60. I'm Curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
32. Way too hilarious....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Mon Dec-10-07 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
36. There's lots of people who would love to see Bill in the WH again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:07 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. millions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. But Hillary is NOT Bill and Bill wouldn't "be" inthe WH again , except as a spouse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Doesn't matter. He'd still be there, that's enough for a lot of people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Not good enough for anyone who has some sense of history or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. This would seem to be outside the realm of history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
44. Nothing to worry about then, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:14 AM Response to Reply #44 |
58. I'm certainly not worried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
49. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andromeda
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:36 AM Response to Original message |
53. Thanks Elmer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:09 AM Response to Original message |
54. Well that's interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
56. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
59. From Now On I'm Just Reading The Threads For The Invectives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:29 AM Response to Original message |
61. Sorry. This fact is outside the accepted narrative. Therefore, it does not exist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:52 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Error, error. Smoke coming out of Obamites' heads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
67. ObamaNation Spin: Oprah makes some Dems more likely to vote for Obama!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. And the other part of the NYT poll says Oprah's endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
69. Everybody Say They Hate Negative Campaigning to the Pollster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
70. The Oprah Obama circus is backfiring even sooner than I thought. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #70 |
74. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
71. Holy shit - More likely to vote for 1%!!?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
73. Brought to you by the MSM that made Scott mcClellan story disappear, dig it!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. If the dreaded "MSM" is reporting it...it cant be true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
77. What a silly thread this is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
78. Oprah will make no difference to Barack, but Bill cannot fix Hillary's flaws either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
79. the corporate media's continued propping up of unelectable candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Fill us in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC