|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:25 AM Original message |
Repubs. putting out attack ad on Hillary to unite the Dems. around her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Why else would they run an ad againt her when she's not the nominee yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Whenever Dean or Kerry faced attacks, donations to them increased. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
2. HANNITY!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Did you read what I wrote???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yeah, it's all about Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Um, no it's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Why would you 'buy what he was selling?' He sells CRAP, see? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. That's the point! He IS selling crap by sayng the Repubs. are attacking her to lift up the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Sometimes I just wonder about people...then I see they actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. So you still don't get it. Too bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. Analysts think the reason Hillary is going negative on Obama is to drag him down so Edwards can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I saw that, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. That's what I like about you, jenmito... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
27. Thanks, ClarkUSA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
9. Because the Republicans would never say anything bad about Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. Of COURSE they'd say bad things about ANY Dem., but with Hillary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
11. If you think for one second a black candidate isn't a rightwingers wet dream, you're kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. Sorry, but I don't. They're scared to death of THIS Black candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
88. Americans might claim they're ready for a black candidate, but I believe the underlying racism is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
12. Are you for real???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:13 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. They will label anyone we nominate an "empty suit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
49. Maybe, but in this case it has the ring of truth and it might stick. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
31. You just made my point with your comment about Rove... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
41. Barack Obama would be the hardest of our candidates to demonize. Don't let the freepers fool you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
13. Republicans are scared of Obama? LMAO...This is who the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. 2008 should be a much easier year than either 2000 or 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. They sure are! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
15. Hannity explained last week and had lots of agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
34. And you BELIEVE him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:57 AM Response to Original message |
17. Hillary Clinton isn't on the GOP candidates' minds now except insomuch as she helps them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
35. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
86. The campaigns themselves are all crapping their pants right now over the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
18. Are the Obama people putting out their attacks on Hillary for the same reason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. Attacks? Pointing out differences is not attacking someone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. Hillary polls worse than the other major candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. Since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
30. But I thought attacks on people meant the attackers were afraid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Between members of the same party, yes, that's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
54. When they attack Obama its because they are afraid of him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. I haven't seen them attacking Obama. As a matter of fact, Rove gave him advice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Yeah funny how he's getting nothing but sunny coverage lately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Yeah, right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. I think Karl Rove is trying to stir shit period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. So you don't believe he was really giving Obama advice to beat Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. Only non-Hillary candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Damn and I went thru all that shock therapy to expunge it from my mind.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. I see you prefer to post to someone who agrees with you rather than address my response to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. I can't talk to a friendly face? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Sure you can. But you obviously CAN'T refute my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I figured thtat would be your response, given your logic . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Show me where I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
32. LOL! It's a comedy matinee!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Got any evidence of that? Because all the polls I see show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. *You* ask *me* for *evidence* after you actually typed and hit 'post message' with: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. I didn't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Got that "evidence" proving your OP yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Forget the tin foil .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
69. Hey-if YOU want to believe Hannity, be my guest! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. No need. If you choose to believe Hannity, be my guest! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. "Hannity" said "They're scared to death about the Obama surge"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. No. He didn't say that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
48. Oh tell me more about this ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Or a whole suit LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
52. Or possibly putting out an attack ad to raise her negatives among Dems, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Like the Dems. would believe anything the Repubs. say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Just like the recent right-wing hit on Nancy Pelosi did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. What's Nancy Pelosi running for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Oh, I get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Who said Dems. would swallow ANYTHING from the RW? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. I must have hallucinated the entire Pelosi/Waterboarding flap. Or perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. What in the world does that have to do with my OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. It has more to do with your claim that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. They're playing games with our side, trying to influence the outcome of the nomination... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Agreed. But it might well be to the opposite end you assume. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. If it IS the opposite, that would mean Hannity is telling the truth. Sorry, but I don't trust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. The Devil does not always lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Does that go for Novak, too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. It's soooooo clear isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
79. Never listen to Hannity and never ever will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. I like to see the strategy of the enemy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. First they get you to listen to the subliminal messages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
84. I think the GOP is freaking out about all dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
87. Those evil... geniuses...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. They're not evil geniuses. They're evil dummies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
89. Hillary would be a conservative wet dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. I agree 100%! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC