|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:13 AM Original message |
Another reason for progressives to vote for John Edwards, whether you trust him or not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. You summed up my thoughts nicely- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. "whether you trust him or not"?? I don't trust that he's a real progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Do you have a basis for saying that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. There is actually only one candidate in this race that appellation fist +it ain't Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Are you speaking to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. "I have a problem responding to baseless and ridicules name calling." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. This is what I was responding to: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. This post is baseless and ridicules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I didn't write the OP- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Does Edwards have a problem with the progressive vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The point is, to vote for the mandate of what they are saying... Not just "to win"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. I won't vote for either one of them in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. So who is the populist progressive you recommend instead?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Under your terms, there is only Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I guess under my terms I was trying to say that I'm willing to accept people changing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. then it must be Kucinich - vote for the mandate, not just to win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I'm thinking I can get both with Edwards.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Some support from Unions, Environmentalists, and Progressive Groups- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
3. Ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
6. Nice post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Thanks Cali- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. In my book though, the only other principled choice to vote for in the primaries is DK... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Actually, I don't think there's much difference on issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. I Like What You Posted... Since I've Supported Him For A Very Long Time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
11. Nice thoughts, but America mandated change in 2006 and look what we got |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katadin706
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
14. It's not good enough, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I like DK, I've even sent money- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I don't fault anyone for voting for Kucinich in the primaries either! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
17. He ain't perfect, but he is our best choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
45. No he's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 09:20 AM Response to Reply #45 |
55. Nice substantive response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
19. Thank you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
23. I like John Edwards..some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
27. I think I am pretty darn liberal. I am not voting for Edwards in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
48. So, which non-lawyer "sellout" do you support? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. Hillary Clinton's also a lawyer... Why is she immune and Edwards not?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penguin7
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I am probably going to vote for Hillary in the general unless Kucinich gets the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. And you HONESTLY believe they'll beat him up more than they will Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
28. Well said. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
31. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
33. Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
weeve
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
35. Great Post Calipendence !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
39. It's a two-way street. He has to show us he can win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
weeve
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Not so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. You can dream, but if that's what Edwards is banking on, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. If we "surrender" to our candidates "needing" money, public campaign financing will NEVER happen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. Well, we need both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Edwards would get his ass kicked in the general. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. The polls don't agree with you. I think they say that he would do better than Hillary would! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
44. No. Way. In. Hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
weeve
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Two posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. That's funny- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC