|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ariesgem
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:20 PM Original message |
As Iowa Nears, Clinton Allies Quietly Raise Obama's Cocaine Use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hell, we already "elected" a president twice who spent the vietnam war snorting coke! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Good point.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. He was a puke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I Still Have A Campaign Button From 00 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Absolutely no comparison-Obama v bu$h. Many people of Obama's generation experimented with drugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Did Bush ever publically admit this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. No. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. So clueless...what that mostly does is remind people how honest and authentic Obama is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Yes he didn't attempt to weasel out of it by having his records disappear (*) or say he didn''t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Stuck in the 90s again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. Given the choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. Both Clintons were lawyers, and were surely aware that Roger Clinton was a user, and probably a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #8 |
55. I dispute your statement about lawyers' responsibilities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #55 |
62. It's called "misprision of felony". Everybody is entitled to a defense, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. Your linked article appears to contradict your position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #68 |
78. If you value your law license, I wouldn't recommend that you be attending any pot parties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. There are other good reasons not to attend pot parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Disbarment or impeachment? It was a big topic during Watergate, as evidenced by this excerpt from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
9. He used cocaine when he was young? Well BFD. So did millions upon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. When did the Clintons attack Bush's cocaine use? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. SUPER GOOD QUESTION !!!11! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. holy crap yah good question!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. My first thought.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
42. Bingo...Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
54. Geez - sandnsea - that is EXACTLY the question I ask in a thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. If this is true, it reeks of desperation from the Clinton camp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. Four words for Camp Hillary : "Nose Like a Hoover" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. He's been honest about his past drug use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. are they going to fire a staffer when THIS backfires on them, too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RDANGELO
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
19. Is it common knowledge that **** used cocaine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. This from a woman whose brother-in-law had cocaine problems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
21. Let's see erroneous post number five. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. It's valid to question, but I suspect it'll have little if any effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
24. that just makes me ill. it's the epitome of dirty politics. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
25. They should bring it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
26. Wait! We HAVE a president that used cocaine in office!!!! And 74% of voters wouldn't vote for him??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeanDem10
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeanDem10
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
28. Appalling that Hill did this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
30. What the fuck.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
31. Good lord, that would sink his candidacy in the general election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Not if he runs against Ghouliani |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. We can do better than Biden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Who's better qualified for the presidency and to beat the Republicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #31 |
48. No, it wont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
34. If elected, he would be a hypocrite if he didn't immediately change drug laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Good point..the fooking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. He has spoken in support of changes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
37. There will be new stuff about Clinton, I'm sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #37 |
61. All they have to do is re-embellish all the old fake or exaggerated stories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
38. Does she remember the current resident of the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
41. Just because WE don't think it's an issue and admire him for his honesty and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Yep. This is something Romney would be merciless on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Ghouliani wouldnt be merciless on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Rudy will not be the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. Romney was over 30 when his religion altered their official view on African Americans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Romney wont either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
52. That's overblown (no pun intended) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #52 |
74. Exactly - what's a GOP gonna do - say that Bush did coke cuz he could afford it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
46. Pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
49. Blech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
53. "Quietly" doesn't work out so well any more, does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
56. I guess the madrassa emails weren't enough. Fuck. The. Clintons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. So disgusting. n't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. There's no difference between Rovian dirty tricks and Clintonian dirty tricks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #60 |
84. Well, there is one little difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
57. I want more of this from Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
59. Ah, the sound of swiftboat engines revving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
63. Well gee, maybe if the press would have dug a little deeper in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pgh_dem
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. Making sure I have the whole checklist of pro-Sen Clinton talking points: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #63 |
81. sorry, friend, we do not need another Emperor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
64. I go with the counter argument: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
65. A New Smear Campaign-_Such Fun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. How is this a smear campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Because it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Wanting candidates to stick to positive campaigns... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #66 |
85. Shaheen Suggested That Obama May Have Been a Drug Dealer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. This smear campaign is aimed at Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Why didn't they ever think it was fun to smear Bush the last 7yrs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
72. Karl Rove tactics. Not surprising from people who once relied on Dick Morris for advice. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. And people who would actually sleep with the enemy - - the Carvilles are NOT good people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
73. Wow, that's really sleazy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
77. Desperation by the Hillary camp. All year long they wouldn't touch it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
79. They just mentioned it on MSNBC, and said it would be a dumb move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. I think they are vicious enough to go even further.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC