|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
RiverStone
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:30 PM Original message |
Can you imagine Edwards or Obama choosing Hillary as their V.P.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. No/No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. HIGHLY unlikely. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Red Zelda
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. Both would pick Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Edwards wouldn't pick Richardson. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. because...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. They are polar opposites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. gotta agree - Richardson was definitely playing suck up to Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Edwards wouldn't pick Richardson because he got scolded by him for picking on Hilllary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Then I don't believe that a populist candidate would pick a DLC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Now thats more like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. don't believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Neither one would pick Richardson! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. NO and she wouldn't take it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Agreed - she wouldn't play second fiddle. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. I don't think so -- not after the scuffles they've had with her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. I don't see any of the big 3 picking each other for VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
11. No they wouldn't pick her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
13. 12 posts and 100% in agreement ---- NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
14. I don't see a VP candidate in the lineup. I have heard rumblings about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
15. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. No - she could not function as # 2, IMO. I can't imagine her accepting that position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. No, and no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
20. She would be a dangerous veep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. No/No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Tue Dec-11-07 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
23. Absolutely. What better back-up would there be than Hillary to fill in for ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
26. Why would she even take it if offered? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmudem
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 06:59 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. The only reason she ran for Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. what is the basis of that statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Bull crap!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 03:36 AM Response to Original message |
27. no. but biden might pick her for veep n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
28. Hillary is too far along in her career to accept the VP nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
29. They wouldn't choose her and she wouldn't accept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anarcho-Socialist
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
30. Yes/Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
32. No way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
33. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
35. I can't imagine either ever being in the position to choose a VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
37. Yes...and I doubt it...though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus
![]() |
Wed Dec-12-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
38. Never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC