|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 05:53 PM Original message |
Poll question: Would you make this deal with Ralph Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. HELL NO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Terrorist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. IT SURE IS!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Better to run v. Nader than make a deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 05:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. A terrorist, by definition, uses violence to accomplish his or her goals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foo_bar
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 07:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. nader isn't a terrorist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yes, certainly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. For once, Darranar, we agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Piperay
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
7. NO, nader missed his opportunity for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHBowden
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. Republican plants in the administration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. No. Nader is a wretch who makes money condemning other wretches. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
13. Conditionally. Two things: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. What he said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC