|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:36 PM Original message |
Poll question: Is the Hillary Campaign's claim that Obama will be attacked on past drug use legit or sleazy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's irrelevant. That's all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I disagree. It's irrelevant to US, it wouldn't be irrelevant to a large number of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I should have been more clear. I think any prior drug use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. Oh god they already voted for Bush - TWICE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. I think it's sleazy because he's admitted it and it's not like he tried to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. And "throw it out there" and hope the media picks up on it... Disappointing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. They are insinuating that he was a dealer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Wow, that's news to me, and even worse. I too hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Bush admitted to past drinking and it's still an issue on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I think that's because many people think he's lying about having stopped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
52. If Obama were to get the nod, the repugs will bring this up and it WILL be an issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's the equivalent of a whisper campaign or a push poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. Personal growth from past mistakes is an important characteristic of a leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Wait for whispers in SC about a white lovechild |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groovedaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What about the gay relationship between Obama & McCain in SC? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. I know for a fact Obama fathered a black baby... maybe two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RDANGELO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. It was definately intended for a negative affect on Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. Let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Obama's prior support for banning handguns is a huge problem for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
29. Not if Rudy's their nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. SaveElmer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
10. Sleazy. The equivalent of Fox News saying, "Some say..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. It is legitimate, but then think of all the things Hillary will be attacked for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's sleazy because they're using it as a guise to bring it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's just plain nasty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
35. Andrew Young |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-13-07 09:12 AM Response to Reply #35 |
65. Fair enough, I don't remember that particular detail of a most bizarre endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
48. Agreed--It's a Pathetic Campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. What is Hillary's drug use? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
49. Power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. Little Dreamer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. It sucks, like most of what they do. Ugliest campaign since Kerry Healey's so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. It's sleazy as hell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. But it's the truth. Obama's VERY vulnerable to Repub attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. We'll see the real character of DUers, that's the truth n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. For admitting, years ago, that he experimented with drugs in high school? Bush was doing much worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. Sleazy attack from a sleazy candidate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
25. So sleazy. It'd be like the Obama camp being "concerned" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. That's exactly what it is - - - Like a freeper-type "concern" post here on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Bingo. You hit the nail square on the head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
31. It's sleazy but typical of a slipping candidate's campaign. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
36. A bit of both, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
37. How about: who gives a shit about these two anymore... /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
39. If it is legitimate, it's legitimate to bring up all the old Clinton stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
40. The Shaheen's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
41. It's just bullshit promoted by the Obama American Idol Group. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. It's the old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Time for a new trick there Pony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
44. Legit - Its going to come up in the GE if we don't talk about it now-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
46. Legit, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
47. Republicans will open up any can of worms against any Democratic nominee. So of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
50. So the Obama people think the Repugs would not use this? IQ alert! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Everyone expects the Repugs would. Now we know one Democrat who actually has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. We know they'll attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. I picked a song to explain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
55. It's the equivalent of a narc trying to bust someone who already admitted to doing drugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
56. This will help Obama, so I guess it's legit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
57. Sleazy as fucking hell! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
58. It will backfire on Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
59. If he was under 40, then the rule of "youthful indiscretion" comes into play. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
60. You guys are amazing. Anything Obama has done is off limits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. It's not the topic as much as the underhanded way they bring it up, doing the Repubs work for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
61. Of course, It's Sleazy.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
63. Sleazy but I'm glad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-12-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Well, I'm not glad they brought it up but it does reveal their desperation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-13-07 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
66. Kick... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithfulcitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-13-07 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
67. both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC