|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 09:50 AM Original message |
Edwards is more electable period: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. I don't get it either........I still think Hillary would end up in a spectacular loss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. He may be Southern, but he's not a Southern man's Southern man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. And what's your idea of the perfect "Southern man's Southern man"?.....This?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Evidently, since you posted this, it shows what you think one is, n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Hey, why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. LOL, I thought so. You are the poster child of the day. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Um... no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #23 |
74. Bill Clinton had no significant experience in foreign policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 07:14 AM Response to Reply #74 |
86. That was 1992... surely you know we lost 3,000 people and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D23MIURG23
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #23 |
77. Im a midwestern white male, and I have to disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 07:18 AM Response to Reply #77 |
87. Why are you leaning toward him, may I ask? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D23MIURG23
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #87 |
102. I like you am not that comfortable with the field. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
35. No. This: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D23MIURG23
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 01:05 AM Response to Reply #35 |
78. PUKE!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
42. Snake- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CherokeeDem
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Hey... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Guess what... I'm a Southern female, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
68. As usual, you offer no proof for this assertion. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 07:19 AM Response to Reply #68 |
88. As usual, Edwards supporters have incredibly weak skins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 02:42 AM Response to Reply #88 |
108. And this comment proves your assertion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
73. You are wrong. He is not too pretty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 07:21 AM Response to Reply #73 |
89. He gets better numbers now because he's not discussed!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
75. What sterotype bullshit are you selling anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman11173
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 07:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
90. Southern men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
127. I call BS. How do you think he won his Senate race in NC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
3. racist and sexist arguments suck big time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Having a less progressive president would suck more. Having a Republican president would suck most.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Sorry, I don't countenance racism or sexism to promote a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I disagree with the logic in two paragraphs in the OP, but how can you deny that Edwards polls best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. then fine, make that argument. but arguing that this country isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Have you read Freakonomics, by the way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
31. Not just a tad bit partisan against Edwards are you, cali? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. sure, I oppose Edwards. That doesn't mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Oh, so NOW you admit that you are partisan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Oh, please. I'm not partisan in the sense that people generally mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #47 |
58. You saying that you are not partisan in the sense people generally mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
53. Funny isn't it, you read the entire piece and it appears someone can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Yes, it can. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #14 |
38. An explanation of why they poll the way they do is in order. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. Edwards has no progressive credentials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Then post the facts to back it up. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Biden's promotion of the bankruptcy bill was also not what I'd call progressive either...q |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #50 |
65. Edwards has promised meaningful change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. I'm With You... FDR?? Different Time & ERa, But MOST Certainly A Man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #50 |
70. Cali, what are you so worried about happening if Edwards becomes president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 06:49 AM Response to Reply #70 |
111. I worry that he really doesn't have any core beliefs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 06:56 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. He is making a clearer statement about what he's going to do than any candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 07:05 AM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Campaign promises are broken far more often then they're kept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 07:07 AM Response to Reply #113 |
114. Which one do you think he won't push for, and why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 07:35 AM Response to Reply #114 |
116. I'm not going to go into this at length. I've already done that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 07:47 AM Response to Reply #116 |
117. I don't find any of those arguments convincing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 07:59 AM Response to Reply #117 |
118. I understand why some of you Edwards supporters are so defensive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:15 AM Original message |
I just cited his senate record! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:15 AM Response to Reply #118 |
119. I just cited his senate record! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #119 |
120. You actually believe that electing a dem president was more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:25 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Because, with the right dem president, that would have been the end of wars for wall street |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:29 AM Response to Reply #121 |
123. It also gives quite a few lousy ratings from liberal orgs - and you know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:40 AM Response to Reply #123 |
126. Yeah. I want you to support your argument with facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #126 |
129. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. This is how uninformed that post is: you use the low CATO rating against Edwards!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:29 AM Response to Reply #120 |
122. Furthermore, what's more important to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:31 AM Response to Reply #122 |
124. It's not either/or. I take many things into consideration when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:40 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. I'm not asking "either/or". I'm asking, "relatively, which is more important" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #125 |
128. you haven't addressed the cognitive dissonance of Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. The "cognitive dissonance"??? Writing the word "red" in blue font is cognitive dissonance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
64. Obama worked as a civil rights lawyer, HRC has plenty of Childcare credients going back decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 01:00 AM Response to Reply #14 |
76. Arguing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
63. He won exactly SC and NC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #63 |
72. All that's great, but I believe Edwards did better against Bush than Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #72 |
101. The key words were "I believe" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 06:40 AM Response to Reply #101 |
110. Edwards and Kerry did same against Bush after February. I still remember Edwards doing better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Interesting how you read into things the way you do or the way you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
56. I am begining to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
4. Geez, I know who I want for the R. nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. Edwards would be quite formidable against any of the Pukes. Thompson is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. interesting that you don't object to the inherent racist and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. What is there to object to? Yes, he did not need to throw in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. if you can't see why this is the worst argument that a progressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
26. You might need to rethink your argument and stay focused on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #26 |
48. I hate to break this to you but the author of the piece YOU posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. What is sad is your pathetic hate of someone so much that you pull |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
71. "Hypocrisy problem." Hmm. Have you see this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #18 |
43. I've never made this argument- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
9. A 5th Rec for the Carolinian. The imminently electable Carolinian at that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yes, will be interesting after the Iowa and NH primaries and who is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
19. Hillary stands the best chance of losing, IMO.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Also since she would FLOOD the teevee with money/ads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sooner in VA
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
20. Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. What I like about Edwards is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
27. Well, Doug Wilder, a black man, was elected governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
30. "Electable". Does that term really mean much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
32. If the "new" Edwards were to be scrutinized ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
33. I'll vote for Obama. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
34. KICK, I Agree & Have For Much Longer Than Most! I've Heard That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
36. Electability better be important to voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sooner in VA
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. RE: Electability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #37 |
66. That might be a really dangerous tack to take... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
40. One thing that we haven't looked at is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
44. K&R from another Southerner. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
45. This just in...America is not ready for a black man who is good at golf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
46. Yes, there are still a lot of knuckle-draggers, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danascot
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
49. The fact is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
51. Go ahead and keep pretending that Edwards has not accepted matching funds...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #51 |
93. I know you have been saying this in many threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
59. The Agonist is one of my favorite blogs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
60. Why aren't polls like this reported by the MSM? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
61. You lost me in your first paragraph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
62. Fundraising doesn't count towards electability? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 01:06 AM Response to Reply #62 |
79. Does it have to be about who has the most money every time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael
![]() |
Thu Dec-13-07 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
69. I would vote for a woman in a heartbeat. Just not that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cadaverdog
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 02:04 AM Response to Original message |
80. I am ashamed to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 02:58 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. fuck that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #83 |
96. fuck your prognostications founded on nothing but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #96 |
98. 50/50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #98 |
100. I don't think any of them have the qualities to make them great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. of course they'd be better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
81. When willyou people get it. ELECTABILITY IS NOT AN ISSUE THIS TIME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 06:56 AM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Except that the more "electable" a candidate, the bigger their coattails will be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 09:38 AM Response to Reply #81 |
95. At this time that is what it appears |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
82. "the poor and middle class are getting screwed", if they vote for Edwards!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 07:13 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. nah. I'm not flaming you, just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 08:00 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. Good Morning; n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #85 |
97. you try writing that many words when you're loaded and about to go to sleep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 08:09 AM Response to Reply #82 |
92. Never do flame and never have used the ignore, always interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #82 |
104. What do you think Edwards is going to do if he's elected? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
94. I have to add more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #94 |
106. Excellent point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970
![]() |
Fri Dec-14-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
99. I'm gradually settling on Edwards as my choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
105. Thanks. But I will continue to look around n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
107. Not With That House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosetta6
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
109. Anyone who voted for the Iraq invasion cannot be considered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
115. Haven't we seen enough of these "match-up polls" to realize they make no sense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
132. Edwards rocks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC