4 fucking rec's (now 9 rec's) for Stormfront garbage because it attacks Hillary?!?!?!

[rinsd]

Are you fucking kidding me GDP?

Some of you make me truly ill.

Update: Thank you mods!

[AX10]

1. The far left is just as bad as the far right.

[readmoreoften]

55. Right.... just like the Dems are as bad as the Republicans!

:crazy:

Really? Single payer health care is as bad as lynching? Ending the war is as bad as overturning Roe v. Wade? Stopping illegal wiretapping is as bad as stopping the public school system?

Or do you just mean in their nasty tactics? Like Clinton's "Obama's a cokehead" stunt? Or like Obama's Punjab remark?

[Kurt_and_Hunter]

2. If this wasn't the internet there would be a Jim Jones ending

Cultist behavior all around. God knows what they'll do when the house of cards collapses

[LoZoccolo]

3. The Nazis on this board should all be tombstoned along with Naderites and splinterists. n/t

[ret5hd]

23. Dooga dooga dooga dooga dooga?

[readmoreoften]

56. Why do I get the feeling you'd tombstone progressives in real life? /nt

[LoZoccolo]

58. Because you have an overactive imagination?

:freak:

I'm not a psychologist, so I'm not sure.

[Occam Bandage]

4. I have no idea what it is about Hillary that drives some people insane.

Honest to God. No other politician inspires so much bizarre bullshit.

[TomInTib]

8. It's The Cackle!!!

Just kidding, O B.

[L0oniX]

50. Cackle cackle cackle

:sarcasm:

[AlinPA]

13. Agree. I just don't see it.

[Tom Rinaldo]

14. It is done simpley because it can be done

Fifteen years of hard Right wing work went into smearing Hillary, and guess what? Now it is easy to attack her for being "polarizing" and for having the personality traits that Rush Limbaugh and company worked so hard for years to pin on her.

There are legitimate grounds to not support or not like Hillary on. But harvesting the seeds of hate sown by the right for 15 years is a weapon uniquely suited to attacking Hillary that those who would prefer that she not become our nominee have had thrust into their hands, and some all too gleefully are willing to use it.

[dbackjon]

22. Thank you!!

Someone else gets it!

[Whisp]

42. because she will be about change just as the Dem congress has proven...

they are not about change at all.
and it will take Years to finally see it as so.
There is no time.

[journalist3072]

5. You know how the anti-Hillary force here is on DU.....They will recommend any anti-Hillary thread,

no matter the source.

[quinnox]

6. where?

I got to see this, I probably have the poster on ignore already but lets see who the nazi scum is. please give a link so I can check it out.

[LoZoccolo]

9. Here is the link.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3838295

[quinnox]

11. thanks

its a new poster - I saw that post but didnt read it really, oh well, they will probably be tombstoned so I can save a place on my ignore list.

[ElizabethDC]

7. Eh, I cease to be surprised by anything Hillary-related here on DU

It's becoming a more and more unpleasant place to be.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

10. I Remember A Hillary Hater Writing Clinton Would Lose Because She Kissed Suha Arafat

They need to harmonize their message...

[babylonsister]

12. Care to weigh in on these?

They're just as simple-minded.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3837521

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3837020

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3836786

[Occam Bandage]

15. Do they complain about Jews hijacking America and link Stormfront as a source?

Those are bogus, childish attacks that should be shunned. This is virulent hate-writing.

And if you think I'm some sort of pro-Clinton, anti-everyone-else zealot, check out my posts in these threads:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2469123
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3835247#3835416
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3831366&mesg_id=3831366

[babylonsister]

20. I honestly don't know what thread the OP is talking about; I'm trying

to ignore them all. Is it in GD/P? I'll go alert myself.

Edit to add: nevermind, I found it.

[RaleighNCDUer]

29. I withdraw my objection.

That link does exist on the others given - though it was missing from the original which has now been deleted.

[Occam Bandage]

31. Edit: Yeah, seems he learned that stormfront links don't sit well with progressives.

He couldn't hide from his past attempts,though.

http://andrew_c_white.mydd.com/story/2007/12/12/164859/81
http://www.againsthillary.com/2007/12/13/hillarys-money-problem/
http://shaun_appleby.mydd.com/story/2007/12/12/164859/81

[rinsd]

37. Yes wouldn't want to sully anti semitic bs shit by pointing out its audience.

[RaleighNCDUer]

45. Well, he DID also link Ha'aretz and Jersulem Post. nt

[rinsd]

51. self delete

[RaleighNCDUer]

54. And WTF is that supposed to mean?

He was drawing from both reputable and disreputable sources. Or do you think that Stormfront has a connection to Ha'aretz? That the J-post is a nazi rag?

This is the whole point of the article - anyone who objects to AIPAC influence is automatically anti-semitic or a nazi.

I, as a Jewish atheist, strongly object to that characterization. Don't let the propaganda short circuit your brain cells.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

17. Bad As Linking Stormfront

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=stormfront&btnG=Search



You 're kidding me...

[RaleighNCDUer]

35. Self delete

I didn't see it on the original post, but it does exist elsewhere.

[Occam Bandage]

40. Self-delete in kind.

:hi:

[rinsd]

18. You can already see my comment for the first one (its #11)

The 2nd one is ridiculous in claiming it was an addiction.

And the 3rd?

That's an example of gutter politics thru an Obama surrogate.

Not sure why that was bad.

As ugly as they are how does that compare to outright antisemitic material that was originally sourced Stormfront for crissakes. Is this somehow invalid because some Hillary supporters went slimy?

Also I am not sure why you are turning this into a candidate supporter thing. Its not like this soon to be tombstoned nazi is connected them. :shrug:

[babylonsister]

26. I was referring to nasty posts in general,

which I'm finding more distressing the further we get into this. Facts are one thing, but baseless accusations are getting old. I wish we'd all make a concerted effort to not attack other Dems with nothing more than speculation or opinion or out-and-out lies. And I know, that will never happen.

As for the 3rd, the original contention is based on a lie from a Clinton supporter. Gutter politics indeed.

But I know it will go on...and on, and I'm glad I arrived late to the party in 04.

[rinsd]

32. Why? Is that guy not a supporter of Obama?

[babylonsister]

44. He's a supporter, but how can Obama have

any control over what he says? He doesn't work for Obama, so trying to spread blame to Obama seemed dishonest.

[rinsd]

46. I didn't see SaveElmer make an inference that it was related to the campaign.

And I am sure you have seen plenty of people who back Hillary have their comments used even though they have no official affiliation with the campaign.

[babylonsister]

48. HE posted it and mentioned Lewinsky; he was

stirring the pot whether you want to agree or not. Lewinsky wasn't even mentioned until the poster brought her up.

[cali]

52. Actually, there's no comparison between simple minded'- and

btw, I only agree about the first two of your links- there was nothing simple minded about the third, and hate. Sad that it's not obvious to some people that Stormfront isn't simple minded; it's pure, unadulterated hate.

[Cameron27]

16. Hit alert rinsd, I did.

[rinsd]

19. I hope everyone does.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

21. I Think It Should Stay

It clearly shows how some Hillary Haters have no boundaries...

[Bucky]

24. He hit ten before the lock

One vote CAN make a difference!

[Catherine Vincent]

25. I saw 10 recs.

Clinton-haters don't care. When they see any thread that is considered anti-Clinton, they hit the rec button. Freepers?

[Bucky]

30. Actually one newcomer to DU actually recc'd in order to get the mods to act faster

But he's one of the good guys, judging by his posts, and not particularly partisan for any candidate. He is, obviously, a little new at how DU works. But that's why they're called newcomers.

The rest I'm guessing were fellow freeplurkers more than anti-Clinton people. The incident is more amusing than worrisome.

[Occam Bandage]

33. Yeah, that was me.

Newb mistake *blushes*

[Bucky]

43. I've done worse.

I once got pissed at a fellow poster here and accused him of being an AIPECker spreading disinfo on our site. He politely informed me he was actually a peace activist and a DUer of quite long standing. One only learns the hard way to look before leaping. :)

[RaleighNCDUer]

27. Self delete.

The Stormfront link exists, if not on the original post on several others made by the same guy.

[rinsd]

34. When Nazis fondly quote you, the time has come for some introspection.

[mtnsnake]

36. Aint that the truth

Perfectly put, rinsd. :thumbsup:

[Occam Bandage]

38. Nobody's suggesting Findley is a member of Stormfront. Rather,

we're saying that the OP there linked to a stormfront recap of his book, referring to how "he was driven out of Washington for refusing to bow to Jewry's demands."

I don't see what the misspelling has to do with anything.

[Alamom]

28. There was a time when someone joined a week ago and had 11 posts, they didn't rate a response.

They got a welcome & were treated almost like an outsider until they had made many posts and everyone knew where they stood and more important, why they joined. (me included)

The hatred is so rabid, it seems there are those who sit and wait for these types of posts so they can jump on them with responses and recs.

So many trolls and disrupters......so little time.....







edgr

[Karmadillo]

39. Not surprising. CDS makes strange bedfellows.

nt

[JNelson6563]

41. Nice thread title

It's this kind of crap that causes me to not send fellow Dems to DU anymore.

Julie

[proudmoddemo]

47. Don't Accuse People of Crying After this post n/t

[rinsd]

49. Whose crying? You think anti-semitic crap is ok to post here?

[BootinUp]

53. why bother. nt

[proudmoddemo]

57. Do You Think The Racist Stuff Coming From Senior Campaign Aides

And the racist strategy that went with it is ok?

Congratulations Hillary, you poisoned the Democratic Party with your racist campaign.

For the record, I didn't see the original post. There has been some weird things here lately (Mena, posts basically lifted from Free Republic in 1999, "Obama's Heavy Drug Use," BS, etc). That said, this is coming from free lancing internet posters, not the chairman of Obama's New Hampshire campaign. I'm sure that the Obama camp would prefer to not have the support of a few posters. But that's democracy--can't control who people support and what they say.

(Edit: Saw it. I am of Jewish heritage, though I consider myself a Christian. We are not, nor were we ever Rich. The post was close to the line. However, it is appropriate to ask what a candidate's views on Israel are, and if some campaign contributions from prominent Israeli supporters may have any sway. Even as a person of Jewish descent, I have serious issues with much of Israel's current policy--especially the fence, and the checkpoints, which are Apartheid. It pissed my Grandfather off that Carter said that. But my cousins kind of said, "Yeah, fair point." Israel, like America, gets no where by lowering itself in an attempt to combat terrorism. The point about Israeli politics and how that's reflected in campaign contributions is not anti-Semitic. The "Hillary takes money from rich Jews," was border-line).