|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
gardenista
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:42 PM Original message |
May I suggest a GD:GE2004 Forum be started soon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brainshrub
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Hooray! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. Unfortunately, it won't happen till the nominee is selected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Why is that? Did I miss something? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 11:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Once the nominee is selected, people won't be able to promote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 11:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Yeah, you've missed that we don't have a nominee yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:34 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Wow. No chicken counting here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You won't get anything but snarly or snarky from her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 01:09 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I can't go all the way with you on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 01:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Point taken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 01:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Thanks! Wow, you missed all the fun! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. maybe prohibit Nader, we're still in primary season |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I'd prefer not to prohibit discussion of Nader, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 09:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I was hoping to avoid the "ignore" solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brainshrub
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 10:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I never used the ignore feature until Nader threads kept poping up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-04 10:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I just hide everythread with what's-his-name in the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC