|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:05 PM Original message |
HuffPo Charges Big Papers Sitting on recent Clinton Affair Story - I FOUND OUT WHO IT IS (Photo) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. this concerns me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. A stainless steel refrigerator? Shocking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. Sub-Zero, no less! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. probably sub-zero centigrade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #51 |
100. Actually, Sub-Zero is a brand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
83. photographed by Newsweek in front of a refrigerator - lol - and Huff is pushing this? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe because the story is a rumor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. I am no fan of Hillary but this is sickening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. I'd heard rumors about this woman before -- who knows? You make an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
52. Who says Rudy's getting a pass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #52 |
72. Good - haven't been following his numbers, so I"m glad to hear that! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is absolutely fair game in the primaries, and any paper sitting on it is playing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Oh bullshit. or rather dogshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
30. I'm not saying it's news... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. This poster posted the same thing recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Fair enough. The repetition is not needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
46. I also think it matters if Bill's clout is taken so seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
106. Do you feel they sme way abot Obama and drug stories? I haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. Lied on 60 Minutes? When? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. ot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. No text or no thread. It's used so you don't have to open threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
55. thank you 'nt' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
99. You'll occasionally see "eom", which serves the same function: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. "No Text" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
56. thanks nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. My dear loveangelc...nt means no text...and it goes here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
53. thanks you! n/t :-D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. In 1992, both went on 60 Minutes and said Gennifer Flowers was not telling the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
54. Here's the Gennifer Flowers history: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:44 PM Response to Reply #54 |
64. Clinton Settled With Paula Jones For $850,000 on Nov. 13, 1998 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Then of Course he Lied about this Lady and the Cigar and Everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
70. Do you really believe that ANYONE doesn't know about Gennifer Flowers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #54 |
77. Your post is the Great Debunking of "Lied on 60 Minutes." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #54 |
102. At least she's voting for Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
75. All B Clinton said was he had caused pain in his marriage. H. Clinton was feistier- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. "The Lie" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
8. Errr.. it doesn't look like anyone is "sitting" on anything.. this seems to be pretty much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. This could play either way.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. If she divorced him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
60. But then there would be no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
62. That would be refreshing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
12. From April 2002???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. It's NEWS to me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
34. wow. what a whopper. You posted a thread almost identical to this one- including pic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
45. Nice catch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Yeah, serial liars deserve to be hoisted on their own petards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #47 |
74. This thread is certainly proof of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #47 |
76. You can't even get my gender correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #47 |
122. this kind of deceiving is sickening to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
57. Nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
85. So it is the OP who is lying to us. How sad. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
104. Great find! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
17. please document your statements about lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. Both he and Hillary lied about all his affairs, later they were forced to recant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
71. Paula was lying, not Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #25 |
111. I don't recall them lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
19. This is great gossip! And if the story is true, it's an interesting story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
89. I agree with you that he has a "problem" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
20. The Independents that I know do not want to face four years of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
81. Actually someone in Texas has claimed a recent affair with Rudy. Press did not seem interested nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. That's news to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithfulcitizen
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #20 |
117. many dems I know don't either nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
22. Shej's very pretty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
50. Much so than Monica...IMHO. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
23. I'm shocked, SHOCKED! that the Huff Post would post an anti-Clinton story - NOT! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
24. Why would they be having an affair in her kitchen with a photographer present? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. My first reaction, too. I can't imagine Bill posing for pix of his philandering. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #28 |
59. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. on edit: I think you read it correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. IT was at a charity event in her home and said the pose was intimate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
61. My. what a rumor monger you are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. Former Clinton pal and fundraiser David Geffen said that Bill is still cheating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
107. Poor David - Wonder how that Obama choice is working out for him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #107 |
132. At least he didn't rape or grope any women, like your boy Clinton did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #26 |
116. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #116 |
131. Google it or do a search through DU archives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
27. You do realize that your "BREAKING NEWS" is five years old, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. It seems to be NEWS to everyone here, including you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. In case it wasn't ridiculously obvious, I was referring to "BREAKING NEWS" facetiously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. Hot damn! A bimbo eruption, we've missed them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
36. People are going to think the Obama camp is responsible for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. oh yeah right.... Obama secretly slipped viagra into Bills orange juice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. How could Obama be responsible for stories written by the NY Post, The NY Daily News, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
37. If this is true then the Clinton campaign better get in front of it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
42. This will, of course, weaken her candidacy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cassandra
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
48. Humiliate the office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
49. When are we going to grow up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
58. people would not vote for Gore in 2000 because of Clinton's affair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. bwahahaha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
63. I'm worried that Clinton will sabatoge her campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #63 |
115. I worry too. If he *did* have an affair with this blonde... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
65. Anyone else notice that this Lisa looks a LOT like Bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kma3346
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 09:35 AM Response to Reply #65 |
133. That's the first thing I thought of when I saw that picture! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
67. Can't be anything to this story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. I agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
73. If there's an intimate pic, why hasn't someone posted it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #73 |
80. It was in NEWSWEEK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. There's A Picture Of Them In Flagrante DeLicto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #80 |
87. So, it was already published in Newsweek five years ago, and you think it's NEWS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #80 |
91. Soooo, a five-year-old pic proves recent activity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. That's apparently the leap of logic being made in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. In a world where a helium truck is a WMD, that fits right in. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #93 |
98. Thanks for Reminding Me, Bill is having so affairs, forgot about BELINDA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #98 |
105. THE STORY IS FIVE YEARS OLD. What part of that don't you get? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. I am guessing his day job is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
79. Totally NOT surprised. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
man4allcats
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
84. After Dubya, I have to say I find it strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. If it comes out before the general it would sink Hillary against Rudolph Hitler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
man4allcats
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. I don't disagree, but I think anyone who believes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine Took
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
90. Indeed! Why ARE they sitting on this story?? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #90 |
135. Perhaps because there is no proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
92. It was silly enough to worry about who Clinton was banging as president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
97. You know when they say "this thread is useless without pictures"? Well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
101. nooooooo!-- the clenis is loose again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
103. any pictures of the refrigerator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #103 |
109. No, Darn! But it's in the April 8, 2002 issue of Newsweek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Franc_Lee
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
110. Where is FauxNews and Heraldo when you... need them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fightindonkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
112. BORING, Gooliani Has Them, Romney Has Stacks of Wives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #112 |
136. Romney - one wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
113. Boy, I'm sure another Bill Adultery Moment (or two or three) will help Democrats win the GE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
114. How could this be the story they're sitting on? This story was circulating... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #114 |
118. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #114 |
123. it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
119. "The Clintons have no credibility when it comes to Bill's affairs." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
120. this is garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
121. So Hillary is damned if she reacts to his affairs and damned if she doesn't. Interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #121 |
124. It's the wife's fault according to ObamaNation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. I'm not for Obama and of course it's not Hillarys fault... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
126. The Huffing ton Post or Ariana |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
127. The Clintons have obviously come to some sort of understanding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. Unfortunately, it does have an effect on the electability of Hillary, as in removing it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
128. and the media and public will obsess over it for months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
styersc
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
130. Being banned from Free Republic isn't so bad when I can get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seasat
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
134. Oh geez, they're going to start this rumor about every Democratic Candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC