|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:58 PM Original message |
*** Clinton gets Des Moines Register Endorsement *** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Shit..that sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. It's awesome but the Boston Globe went with Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. I just wanted Joe to get it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
110. Until you read the Globe's pathetic endorsement of Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:08 AM Response to Reply #110 |
123. Seriously, the Globe is off the rails with that endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
119. WHAT A WONDERFUL SURPRISE! DMR ENDORSES HILLARY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:05 AM Response to Reply #119 |
142. But, but, but, Obama said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm shocked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. WOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. BOOOOOOOOOO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
27. RECOUNT!! RECOUNT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. Congrats, Clinton supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Wooo Hooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. very classy sentiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
6. The Gannett Corporation stands and applauds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. This is a joke, right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:00 PM Original message |
Shocked at this cynical move by the DMR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
26. They didn't want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well, see how it helped John Edwards four years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
62. He was out before this and it brought him way up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. Picked the most pro-war candidate. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. That's great! I'm glad. She's a great candidate and will be an ever better president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. Sooooprise! I really hoped Biden would get it. This is the first Hillary break in ages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. But, they have never picked a "kingmaker" either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
49. I thought Biden might get it, I thought he might be a compromise of sorts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. They have set the tone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. She is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
122. You bet she is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. Booo...lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yuck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
15. Boy are they uninformed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
20. infinitely corrupt....... of course hillary won.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Must be because their board is all women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #23 |
153. THAT COMMENT Was Actually Stated On C-Span This AM!! I'm Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. Sat around waiting for the endorsement all day...I havent felt this let down in awhile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. quiet you got the Globe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. No, I wont be quiet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. ok make noise then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
67. Also look at the paper's track records in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:27 PM Response to Reply #67 |
78. Cant read much into the Globe going with Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #78 |
154. Actually per 2004 accounts, the Kerry campaign did not count on getting it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #67 |
79. I like that analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Just remember... it had no influence on the voter's pick last time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. I was hoping for Biden - But you got a BIG surprise from the Boston Globe! -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. I hear ya.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #22 |
46. No biggie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. But the DMR is playing up the experience argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #51 |
68. They also throw a nice compliment Obama's way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #68 |
83. The headline may be the only thing to catch people's attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
114. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:16 AM Response to Reply #68 |
136. one word: "knowledge".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
58. I feel the same way. Kind of like a mini version of those 2000/2004 feelings.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. They supported Bradley in 2000 - look where that got him. Don't worry - Iowans will speak -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KennedyGuy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
29. But...But...But...Oprah...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. This is Oprah's on the stump for Obama.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liskddksil
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
55. cute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. Congrats to the Clinton supporters and to the rest - DMR's record for actually picking the winner of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
32. This line is laughable (inside) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. She's well prepared to support and fund the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #37 |
70. Snap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
75. Yep, she has experience where that's concerned!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Maybe she convinced them that it was her, not Bill who was running the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liskddksil
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
33. Actually I think this is good for Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
60. Oh, I didn't see that line! ::runs back to read it all::: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
106. The Edwards slam is the best part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liskddksil
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #106 |
118. I think the people who lost their jobs due to corporate profits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Corporations are governed by legislation.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #106 |
155. Wrong on the wrong meter. Edwards is saying that playing nice hasn't gotten the American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:42 AM Response to Reply #33 |
156. Well, Let's Give Credit To Edwards For Going Forward With His Message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
38. Congratulations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
39. I have always been bothered by the power of newspaper endorsements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
40. Wow. I like what they wrote. Nice. Congrat Hil, good for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #40 |
127. welcome to DU annie1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
41. Well, if you had to reason backwards from and HRC nod, this was about the best case to make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. But momentum could carry him on TT as well -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #50 |
124. I think his momentum just hit a stone wall! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #124 |
129. So these 2 Democratic candidates are "shameful?" Only HRC is honorable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:42 AM Response to Reply #129 |
141. Hillary, in case you hadn't noticed has run a positive campaign.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
107. Dick Morris is an idiot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
47. THE ESTABLISHMENT STRIKES BACK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
48. honestly I was really expecting Edwards. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
53. Congrats Clinton supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Thanks we can use good news now and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #64 |
91. We all can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
54. Hardly shocking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #54 |
63. Good point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #54 |
74. Word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #54 |
77. One can hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
80. Why Do You Insult A Whole Group Of People? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #80 |
94. Tonight, my problem is with the Des Moines Litterbox Liner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:29 PM Response to Reply #54 |
81. Your graciousness is remarkable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:31 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Why should a DK fan give a shit about what the DMR has to say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:32 AM Response to Reply #87 |
140. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #54 |
104. well are you just lovely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuartrida
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #54 |
125. Oh yes, Kucinich/Paul would be such an amazing ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:08 AM Response to Reply #125 |
143. Are you still stuck in two weeks ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuartrida
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #143 |
145. Nah, I only "bash" the Democratic candidates who would make shitty presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #54 |
148. What do you mean...Hillary was in the debate?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
56. Iowans will have a big surprise for the DMR - it WON'T be Hillary Clinton. Bank on it. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #56 |
72. At least judging from the comments posted by the DMR's readers, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forsberg
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
57. Great Job Hil!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
59. Congratulations to the Clinton Campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
65. how many of their endorsements actually win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. none as of late i think. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #65 |
92. Here is their record: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
66. A rather tongue in cheek endorsement.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #66 |
76. Especially this line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #76 |
88. oh ya that, but what about these zingers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
69. how do you know which is a good endorsement and which isn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #69 |
89. I believe its the biggest paper in Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
73. DMR **HURTS** Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #73 |
82. Dont think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:33 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. We'll see -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #73 |
102. Your "beliefs" and $3.50 will get you a cup of coffee at a Starbucks in Des Moines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #102 |
109. Whatever that means - Guess I'm not allowed to give my "beliefs" but you ARE? -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
84. Gads, everybody.. go back to the link and read all the posts pouring in about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #84 |
130. Did they all sign off as Obama supporters.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #130 |
132. Oh look, Hillary is 44. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:23 AM Response to Reply #132 |
138. Yup, and you can also look how long I've been here..You just showed up 5 min ago.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
85. This is great for Hillary and terrible for Edwards. I predict it will now be a 2-person race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #85 |
96. It is terrible for our country. They just condoned politics as usual. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:51 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Our country and Edwards. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #85 |
149. I think it's been a two person race for about 2 months now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
86. The Clintons wined and dined the Des Moines Register staff and Hillary had dinner with Yepsen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #86 |
133. And what did Obama do to get the Boston Globe endorsement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
93. That endorsement means a lot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #93 |
108. Who did they endorse in 1996? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #108 |
128. And Mondale *did* get the nom in '84. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #93 |
150. So Mondale did get the nod in 1984... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
95. Congrats to Team Hillary, both on the ground and here at DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VarnettaTuckpocket
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
97. Oh the horror, McClurkin wept n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
98. Great news for Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
99. That's the fascist fucking fish-wrap that shut Dennis out, ain't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:04 PM Response to Reply #99 |
105. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
101. What? Do they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
103. and this statement just happens to coincide with Hill's latest talking point on 'experience' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:07 AM Response to Reply #103 |
134. No, I believe Bill's line was... Obama = "Rolling the dice for America!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
111. Yay Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
112. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
113. I don't give a damn who they indorse and neither should you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:27 AM Response to Reply #113 |
139. You're posting at one.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #139 |
157. Not even oranges to apples. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
115. Congratulations, Senator Clinton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
116. Kick. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
117. Great news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
120. Sweet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
126. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:19 AM Response to Reply #126 |
137. um..or Edwards, or Biden, or Richardson, or...the rest of the contenders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
131. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
135. I really don't think newspaper endorsements count for that much these days anyhow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rock_Garden
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
144. Wonderful! Chris Matthews will need grief counseling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamom
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
146. Thanks for posting.nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
147. K&R....great news!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
151. PATHETIC Journalistic PANDERING!! Wonder What Gives??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
152. "The choice, then, comes down to preparedness: " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
158. What a riot!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC